NCT01851187

Brief Summary

Pregnancy or childbirth is a kind of persistent and strong source of stress for pregnant women. Prenatal and intrapartum negative emotions not only damage the mental health of pregnant women, but also have a negative impact on the mode of delivery, labor, postpartum complications and neonatal outcomes . Due to considerations for the effect on the fetus, there is concern of the use of drug treatment for depression during pregnancy. Therefore, psychological interventions have an important role. According to the WHO global survey in Asia 2007-08, China had the highest overall rate of caesarean section (46.2%), and also had the highest rate of caesarean section without indication (11.7%). The embarrassing "first in the world" of caesarean section rate was causing widespread concern in China. Recently, the Chinese government has launched a project named "promoting the rate of natural childbirth and protecting the health of mother and child", trying to reduce the cesarean section rate especially that without medical indication. Therefore, examining if emotional management is effective in reducing negative emotions of pregnant women as well as decreasing the rate of cesarean section is an important research question. Our study aims to help the pregnant women control their anxiety, depressive feelings and other negative emotions by "emotional self-management group training" and we examine if this can reduce the incidence of depression and improve delivery outcomes.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
200

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2008

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2008

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2009

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2009

Completed
3.4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 3, 2013

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 10, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

May 13, 2013

Status Verified

May 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

May 3, 2013

Last Update Submit

May 10, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

Psychological intervention,prenatal period,cesarean section rate,stage of labor

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Depressive symptoms assessment

    All participants were randomly divided into intervention group and control group with 100 in each group. At the baseline assessment, all participants filled the PHQ-9 themselves and instructed by a trained nurse, , the diagnosis of depression was fulfilled by the psychiatrists in our research program. When participants scored over than 10 on the PHQ-9, the diagnostic interview was arranged by a research assistant and was done in one week. At the same time, the results of antenatal physical examination for every participant were collected by our research assistants when a participant was enrolled. After the baseline assessment, participants were randomly assigned into two groups: the emotional management (EM) group and the usual care (UC) group.

    The baseline evaluation began at 31 weeks of pregnancy and the mother was followed up to 42 days postpartum

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Obstetric outcome assessment

    after delivery

Study Arms (2)

emotional management (EM) group

EXPERIMENTAL

emotional management (EM) group received antenatal psychological intervention

Behavioral: antenatal psychological interventionBehavioral: routine prenatal care

the usual care (UC) group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

the usual care (UC) group was given routine prenatal care only

Behavioral: routine prenatal care

Interventions

emotion management included: (1) Establish relationship between the health care workers and the pregnant women, (2) Determine training objectives, (3) Guide to practice relaxation training, including imagination and abdominal breathing. (4) Make cognitive adjustment, (5) Relieve anxiety and tension by scene simulation and stimulus exposure. (6) Learn emotional self-regulation, (7) Improve self-efficacy by group interaction. (8) Teach prenatal knowledge ,(9) Guide interactive trainings between pregnant women and their couples; (10) Visit delivery rooms.

emotional management (EM) group

Prenatal routine inspection included blood pressure, weight, uterine fundal height, abdominal circumference, fetal presentation, fetal position, fetal heart rate and so on.

emotional management (EM) groupthe usual care (UC) group

Eligibility Criteria

Age22 Years - 35 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • never have a baby before,
  • with single fetus, head position and normal pelvic measurements,
  • were receiving regular antenatal care,
  • were able to schedule and fulfill questionnaires independently.

You may not qualify if:

  • situation with pregnancy complications,
  • surgical history of diseases,
  • current or previous history of any kind of mental disorders.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The First People's Hospital of Hangzhou

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310006, China

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Depression

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavioral SymptomsBehavior

Study Officials

  • Hejiang Li, MD

    The First People's Hospital of Hangzhou

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 3, 2013

First Posted

May 10, 2013

Study Start

September 1, 2008

Primary Completion

July 1, 2009

Study Completion

December 1, 2009

Last Updated

May 13, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-05

Locations