Safety and Efficacy Study of RVL-1201 in Acquired Blepharoptosis
A Randomized, Double-Masked, Placebo-Controlled Phase 1/2a Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Two Dosing Regimens of RVL-1201 in the Treatment of Acquired Blepharoptosis
1 other identifier
interventional
46
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is an exploratory, proof of concept study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of RVL-1201 dosed once or twice daily for 14 days compared to a placebo (vehicle) control in patients with ptosis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_1
Started May 2013
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 3, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 7, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 22, 2021
CompletedNovember 26, 2021
November 1, 2021
8 months
May 3, 2013
July 1, 2021
November 23, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Humphrey Visual Field
The mean change from baseline (Day 0, Hour 0) in number of points seen on the HVF 36-point ptosis protocol test according to a pre-planned hierarchical analysis as follows: 1. Hour 6 on Visit 4 (Day 13) for the BID regimen versus vehicle 2. Hour 6 on Visit 4 (Day 13) for the QD regimen versus vehicle 3. Hour 2 on Visit 4 (Day 13) for the BID regimen versus vehicle 4. Hour 2 on Visit 4 (Day 13) for the QD regimen versus vehicle Testing was performed using a Humphrey perimeter at a grid of 36 points confined to the superior hemifield extending 55° to either side of fixation and 45° superior to fixation. Testing was accomplished in the standard fashion using a varying 4-mm2 or 5-mm2 stimulus to determine the visual sensitivity for each grid point in the field (Riemann et al, 2000). A 4-mm2 stimulus was acceptable, but a 5-mm2 stimulus was preferred, if available.
Baseline (Day 0, Hour 0), Visit 4 (Day 13, Hour 2) and Visit 4 (Day 13, Hour 6)
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Marginal Reflex Distance
Baseline (Day 0, Hour 0), Visit 4 (Day 13, Hour 2) and Visit 4 (Day 13, Hour 6)
Palpebral Fissure Distance Measurement
Baseline (Day 0, Hour 0), Visit 4 (Day 13, Hour 2) and Visit 4 (Day 13, Hour 6)
Contrast Sensitivity
Baseline (Day 0, Hour 0), Visit 4 (Day 13, Hour 2) and Visit 4 (Day 13, Hour 6)
Corrected Snellen Visual Acuity
Baseline (Day 0, Hour 0), Visit 4 (Day 13, Hour 2) and Visit 4 (Day 13, Hour 6)
Study Arms (3)
RVL-1201 once daily
EXPERIMENTALRVL-1201 0.1% ophthalmic solution dosed one full drop per eye in the morning; one full drop of vehicle (placebo) per eye approximately 8 hours after the morning dose
RVL-1201 twice daily
EXPERIMENTALRVL-1201 0.1% ophthalmic solution dosed one full drop per eye BID; approximately 8 hours between the morning dose and the afternoon dose
RVL-1201 vehicle (placebo)
PLACEBO COMPARATORRVL 1201 ophthalmic solution vehicle (placebo) dosed one full drop per eye BID; approximately 8 hours between the morning dose and the afternoon dose
Interventions
RVL-1201 0.1% Ophthalmic Solution
RVL-1201 Vehicle Placebo
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult male or female subjects 18 years of age and older.
- Presence of all of the following at Screening:
- Loss on HVF 36-point ptosis protocol test of ≥ 8 points in points not seen at or above 10° from fixation in the superior visual field; AND
You may not qualify if:
- Female subjects must be 1-year postmenopausal, surgically sterilized, or women of childbearing potential with a negative urine pregnancy test at Visit 1. Women of childbearing potential must use an acceptable form of contraception throughout the study.
- Provide informed consent prior to undergoing any study-related procedures.
- In either eye:
- Congenital ptosis
- Pseudoptosis
- Horner syndrome
- Marcus Gunn jaw-winking syndrome
- Myasthenia gravis
- Mechanical ptosis, including ptosis due to orbital or lid tumor, cicatricial processes affecting the movements of the upper lid, and enophthalmos
- Dermatochalasis as the sole cause of the signs of ptosis
- Previous ptosis surgery
- Lid position affected by lid or conjunctival scarring
- Current use of prescribed dry eye medication or punctal plugs; artificial tears are allowed
- Visual field loss from any cause other than ptosis
- Inability to fixate on the central fixation target of the HVF
- +17 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Unknown Facility
Morrow, Georgia, 30260, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Sr. Director, Clinical Development
- Organization
- RVL Pharmaceuticals
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Chuck Slonim, MD
Oculos Clinical Research
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 3, 2013
First Posted
May 7, 2013
Study Start
May 1, 2013
Primary Completion
January 1, 2014
Study Completion
February 1, 2014
Last Updated
November 26, 2021
Results First Posted
July 22, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-11