Laparoscopic Single Incision -Vs- Multiple Incision Gastric Band Surgery
SIMIS
A Prospective Double Blinded Randomised Control Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Single Incision Versus Multiple Incision Adjustable Gastric Band Surgery in Patients With Morbid Obesity
1 other identifier
interventional
44
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A double blinded randomised control trial comparing the differences between laparoscopic single incision versus multiple port bariatric surgery in morbidly obese patients (BMI\>35). Single incision surgery is a new minimally invasive surgical technique requiring the surgeon to operate through one small single incision and is virtually scarless. The traditional laparoscopic approach to abdominal surgery is through multiple small incisions (4-7 ports) across the whole abdomen. This study seeks to identify the risks, benefits and costs of the adjustable gastric band insertion via single incision and multiple incision within the morbidly obese patient group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable surgery
Started Nov 2011
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 6, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 3, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2013
CompletedSeptember 2, 2015
April 1, 2013
1.5 years
August 6, 2012
September 1, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain
first 10 days post-operatively
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Time to Discharge
Post-operative ward stay (estimated 2-8 hours)
Other Outcomes (4)
Conversion to laparoscopic or open surgery
Intra-operatively
Intraoperative and post-operative complications
During surgery (intraoperative) and first 30 days (post-operative)
Operative time
Skin incision to skin closure (estimated 45 -75 minutes)
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Multiple Incision Gastric Band Insertion
ACTIVE COMPARATORCurrent standard surgical approach for laparoscopic gastric band insertion
Single Incision Gastric Band Insertion
EXPERIMENTALNew surgical approach for gastric band insertion
Interventions
Insertion of gastric band though single abdominal incision
Insertion of gastric band though multiple abdominal incisions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Morbidly obese patients, BMI ≥35 kg/m2
- Undergoing gastric band surgery
- Undergone a pre-weight loss surgery risk assessment
- Fit for anaesthesia and surgery
- Fulfil day surgery criteria
- Full understanding of bariatric procedure, with informed consent of the risks and benefits of laparoscopic single incision and multiple incision surgery
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy
- History of portal hypertension
- Previous gastric surgery or large hiatus hernia
- Previous laparotomy or bariatric surgery
- Weight \>150kg (day surgery limit)
- Unwilling to consider surgical treatment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
London, Greater London, SE5 9RS, United Kingdom
Related Publications (7)
Patel AG, Murgatroyd B, Carswell K, Belgaumkar A. Fundus-first transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a cholangiogram: a feasibility study. Surg Endosc. 2011 Mar;25(3):954-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1240-6. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
PMID: 20721587BACKGROUNDPatel AG, Belgaumkar AP, James J, Singh UP, Carswell KA, Murgatroyd B. Video. Single-incision laparoscopic left lateral segmentectomy of colorectal liver metastasis. Surg Endosc. 2011 Feb;25(2):649-50. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1237-1. Epub 2010 Jul 22.
PMID: 20652322BACKGROUNDTeixeira J, McGill K, Binenbaum S, Forrester G. Laparoscopic single-site surgery for placement of an adjustable gastric band: initial experience. Surg Endosc. 2009 Jun;23(6):1409-14. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0411-9. Epub 2009 Mar 14.
PMID: 19288157BACKGROUNDde la Torre RA, Satgunam S, Morales MP, Dwyer CL, Scott JS. Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic adjustable gastric band placement with liver suture retractor. Obes Surg. 2009 Dec;19(12):1707-10. doi: 10.1007/s11695-009-9896-5.
PMID: 19579051BACKGROUNDNguyen NT, Slone J, Reavis K. Comparison study of conventional laparoscopic gastric banding versus laparoendoscopic single site gastric banding. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010 Sep-Oct;6(5):503-7. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2009.10.001. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
PMID: 19969508BACKGROUNDTsimoyiannis EC, Tsimogiannis KE, Pappas-Gogos G, Farantos C, Benetatos N, Mavridou P, Manataki A. Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2010 Aug;24(8):1842-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0887-3. Epub 2010 Feb 20.
PMID: 20174950BACKGROUNDPatel AG, Murgatroyd B, Ashton WD. Single incision laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: 111 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012 Nov-Dec;8(6):747-51. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2011.06.013. Epub 2011 Jul 13.
PMID: 21890429BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ameet G Patel, MS FRCS
King's College Hospital NHS Trust
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 6, 2012
First Posted
May 3, 2013
Study Start
November 1, 2011
Primary Completion
May 1, 2013
Study Completion
October 1, 2013
Last Updated
September 2, 2015
Record last verified: 2013-04