Trial of Mannitol Cream for Pain Relief After a Long Run
PainCream
Randomized Trial of Mannitol Cream for Pain Relief After a Long Run
1 other identifier
interventional
170
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Mannitol cream has been shown clinically to be effective for pain control. To determine if this effect is worth testing on a larger scale, 170 runners will receive a sample of 25% mannitol cream to apply on one leg, and the cream base without the mannitol on the other leg following a 10 km or longer run, and for the following five days. Mannitol and control legs will be chosen at random for each runner. Pain scores before and after cream application will be acquired each day for each leg. Means and standard deviations found will be used to determine the size of a larger study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1 pain
Started May 2013
Shorter than P25 for phase_1 pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 16, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 30, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2013
CompletedOctober 11, 2013
October 1, 2013
Same day
April 16, 2013
October 10, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in NRS (Numeric rating scale) pain score
NRS (Numeric rating scale) pain score from zero, no pain, to 10 worst pain ever. Change in pain score will be measured daily starting on day of race, comparing pain following the race, prior to the first cream application, to the daily scores for the subsequent five days. Pain levels in leg given mannitol cream, and leg given placebo cream will be compared according to the change in their pain scores.
For six days following run
Secondary Outcomes (1)
side effects of cream
For six days, starting on day of race.
Study Arms (2)
Mannitol cream
EXPERIMENTALcream containing 25% mannitol, applied as often and as much as needed to one leg ( chosen at random), on the day of a 10 km run, following the run and for five days afterwards
Placebo cream
PLACEBO COMPARATORSame carrier cream as that containing the active ingredient, mannitol, but without the active ingredient. Placebo cream to be applied to the painful areas of the other leg, chosen at random, on the day of a 10 km or more race, following the race, and as needed for the five days after the race. It is to be noted that, as almost no mannitol is absorbed through the skin, it is highly unlikely that this would involve the pain levels in the placebo leg.
Interventions
25% mannitol in PENcream (See above) (See above) This will be applied as needed to one side of the body (blinded assignment) over painful painful areas of legs following a 10 km run, on the day of the run and for five days afterwards.
This is the vehicle only cream (PENcream) (See above) This will be applied as needed to one side of the body (blinded assignment) over painful painful areas of legs following a 10 km run, on the day of the run and for five days afterwards.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- either:
- never ran 10 km or more, or;
- NRS pain level greater than 5/10 in both legs following a 10 km or more run
You may not qualify if:
- no major skin allergies
- no allergy to mannitol
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Dr. Helene Bertrand, University of British Columbia, Department of Family Practice
Vancouver, British Columbia, V7M 2K2, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Cavone L, Calosi L, Cinci L, Moroni F, Chiarugi A. Topical mannitol reduces inflammatory edema in a rat model of arthritis. Pharmacology. 2012;89(1-2):18-21. doi: 10.1159/000335094. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
PMID: 22236612RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Helene Bertrand, MD, CCFP
University of British Columbia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 16, 2013
First Posted
April 30, 2013
Study Start
May 1, 2013
Primary Completion
May 1, 2013
Study Completion
July 1, 2013
Last Updated
October 11, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-10