Study of Low Level Laser Therapy to Treat Chronic Heel Pain Arising From Plantar Fasciitis
A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Randomized Evaluation of the Effect of the Erchonia HP Scanner (HPS) Laser on Chronic Heel Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
69
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the Erchonia HPS Laser is effective in the treatment of chronic heel pain arising from plantar fasciitis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2012
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 17, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 19, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 3, 2014
CompletedJune 3, 2014
May 1, 2014
3 months
April 17, 2013
April 4, 2014
May 8, 2014
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants Who Attained a Change of -30% or Greater in the VAS Score
Each subject rated heel pain upon taking the first few steps of the day on the 0-100 mm (0 -10 cm) Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS) from '0: no pain at all' to '100: worst pain imaginable'. The higher the VAS score, the greater the heel pain experienced. Percent (%) change in VAS score was calculated as the % difference in VAS score at week 5 (2 weeks after procedure administration end) relative to baseline evaluation. A negative (-) % difference in VAS score across the evaluation period indicated a decrease (improvement) in heel pain, and a positive (+) % difference in VAS score indicated an increase (worsening) in heel pain. A change of -30% or greater in the VAS score was considered positive for study success. The number of participants who attained a change of -30% of greater in VAS score across the evaluation period was calculated for both subjects in the test group and in th placebo group as a proportion of the total number of subjects in each procedure group.
baseline and 5 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change in Heel Pain Score on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
baseline and 5 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Erchonia HPS Laser
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe Erchonia HPS Laser contains 3 independent diodes mounted in scanner devices and positioned equidistant from each other and titled at a 30 degree angle. Each scanner emits 17 milliwatts (mW), 635 nm of red laser light.
Placebo Laser
PLACEBO COMPARATORThe Placebo Laser is identical in appearance and operation to the Erchonia HPS Laser but does not emit any therapeutic light.
Interventions
The Erchonia HPS Laser is administered to the subject's heel 6 times across 3 consecutive weeks, 2 times each week, for 10 minutes of treatment time per administration.
The Placebo Laser is administered to the subject's heel 6 times across 3 consecutive weeks, 2 times each week, for 10 minutes of treatment time per administration.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Unilateral mechanical plantar heel pain
- Chronic heel pain defined as at least 3 months of ongoing heel pain with no evidence of acute trauma to the heel
- Degree of heel pain rating on the 0-100 Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is at least 50 for heel pain experienced upon taking the first few steps of the day.
- Heel pain has been previously unresponsive to prescription non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) taken over a minimum period of 2 weeks; and any two or more of the following conservative treatments: rest, taping, stretching, orthotics, shoe modifications, night splinting, casting, physical therapy, or local corticosteroid injections
- Subject is willing and able to refrain from consuming non-study approved medications or partaking in other therapies for relief of heel pain throughout study participation
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to definitively rule out any one or more of the following potential etiologies of chronic heel pain: mechanical posterior; neurologic; arthritic; and traumatic heel pain
- Bilateral heel pain
- Evidence of acute trauma to the heel
- Loss of plantar foot sensation
- Foot deformity
- Previous surgery to the heel
- Foot trauma within the previous three months
- Skin ulceration (infection or wound) on the heel and surrounding area
- Sciatica
- Benign and malignant tumors
- Acute infection of soft tissue or bone such as osteomyelitis
- Diabetic neuropathic pain
- Type I Diabetes
- Sensory neuropathy
- Previous diagnosis of neuropathy affecting lower extremities
- +15 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Arizona Institute of Footcare Physicians
Mesa, Arizona, 85204, United States
Coughlin Foot and Ankle Clinic
Boise, Idaho, 83707, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Michael Coughlin, MD
- Organization
- Coughlin Foot and Ankle Clinic
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael Coughlin, M.D.
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kerry Zang, D.P.M.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 17, 2013
First Posted
April 19, 2013
Study Start
February 1, 2012
Primary Completion
May 1, 2012
Study Completion
May 1, 2013
Last Updated
June 3, 2014
Results First Posted
June 3, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-05