NCT01835249

Brief Summary

Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular and renal disease, and a leading cause of premature mortality worldwide. Early hypertension studies showed that treating elevated blood pressure (BP) reduces patients' risk of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. In subsequent research, patients achieved greater improvement in cardiovascular outcomes when their treatment was aimed at a moderate systolic BP target (\<150mmHg) than at higher targets. Although observational data suggest that even lower BP targets may be beneficial, this has not been seen in randomized trials; instead, "intense" treatment of hypertension (i.e., to a target systolic BP \<120mmHg) was found to have no effect on participants' risk for renal disease, cardiovascular disease, or all-cause mortality. One potential explanation for this apparent lack of benefit of intense BP targets is that the study protocols targeted reductions in clinic BP rather than ambulatory BP. Ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) allows for assessment of BP throughout the day and night. Of all the BP measurements, nighttime systolic BP appears to be the best predictor of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. Because recent trials assessing intense BP targets did not include ambulatory BP measurements, the effect of intensive treatment on nighttime BP is largely unknown. To address this important gap in knowledge, we will conduct ABPM in 600 participants as part of an ancillary study to the ongoing Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT). The goal of the ancillary study is to evaluate the effect of intensive vs. standard clinic based BP targets on nighttime BP (primary outcome), as well as night/day BP ratio, timing of peak BP, 24hr BP, and BP variability (secondary outcomes). The SPRINT trial includes approximately 9250 participants at high risk for cardiovascular disease. The investigators hypothesize that intense targeting of clinic systolic BP does not lower nighttime systolic BP compared to a standard target.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
897

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable hypertension

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2013

Longer than P75 for not_applicable hypertension

Geographic Reach
1 country

10 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 16, 2013

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 18, 2013

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2013

Completed
4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2017

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

January 25, 2019

Status Verified

January 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

4 years

First QC Date

April 16, 2013

Last Update Submit

January 23, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

HypertensionNighttime blood pressure

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Nighttime systolic blood pressure

    Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring will be performed within 3 weeks of the 27 month follow up visit. For the primary analysis, nighttime BP will be defined by narrow clock time (01:00 AM to 6:00 AM).

    27 month follow up visit

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Night to day systolic BP ratio

    27 month follow up visit

  • Timing of peak BP

    27 month follow up visit

  • 24hr average systolic BP

    27 month follow up visit

  • Blood pressure variability

    27 month follow up visit

Study Arms (2)

Intensive BP Arm

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants randomized into the Intensive BP arm will have a goal of SBP \<120mmHg. Drugs will be added and/or titrated at each visit (monthly) to achieve SBP \<120 mmHg. At periodic "milepost" visits, addition of another drug will be "required" if not at goal.

Other: Intensive BP Arm

Standard BP Arm

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants randomized into the Standard arm will have a goal of SBP \<140 mm Hg. Intensify therapy if SBP ≥160 mmHg @ 1 visit; ≥140 mmHg @ 2 consecutive visits; Down-titration if SBP \<130 mmHg @ 1 visit; \<135 mmHg @ 2 consecutive visits.

Other: Standard BP arm

Interventions

Participants in the Intensive arm have a goal of SBP \<120 mmHg.

Intensive BP Arm

Participants in the Standard BP arm have a goal of SBP \<140 mmHg.

Standard BP Arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age55 Months+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • eligible and enrolled in SPRINT at the 27 month follow up visit
  • able and willing to provide informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • arm circumference \>50cm
  • shift worker or work regularly at night
  • history of breast cancer requiring mastectomy
  • end-stage renal disease

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (10)

University of Alabama Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States

Location

Washington DC VA Medical Center

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20422, United States

Location

Mayo Clinic

Jacksonville, Florida, 32224, United States

Location

Carolinas Medical Center

Charlotte, North Carolina, 28203, United States

Location

Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center

Cleveland, Ohio, 44129, United States

Location

University of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States

Location

Memphis VA

Memphis, Tennessee, 38104, United States

Location

Vanderbilt University

Nashville, Tennessee, 37235, United States

Location

Houston VA

Houston, Texas, 77030, United States

Location

University of Utah

Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Drawz PE, Pajewski NM, Bates JT, Bello NA, Cushman WC, Dwyer JP, Fine LJ, Goff DC Jr, Haley WE, Krousel-Wood M, McWilliams A, Rifkin DE, Slinin Y, Taylor A, Townsend R, Wall B, Wright JT, Rahman M. Effect of Intensive Versus Standard Clinic-Based Hypertension Management on Ambulatory Blood Pressure: Results From the SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) Ambulatory Blood Pressure Study. Hypertension. 2017 Jan;69(1):42-50. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.08076. Epub 2016 Nov 14.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hypertension

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Vascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Paul E Drawz, MD, MHS, MS

    University of Minnesota

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 16, 2013

First Posted

April 18, 2013

Study Start

June 1, 2013

Primary Completion

June 1, 2017

Study Completion

July 1, 2017

Last Updated

January 25, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-01

Locations