Influence of Stimulant Medication on Brain Processes for Decision Making in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
3 other identifiers
interventional
131
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The goal of this trial is to investigate the cognitive- and brain-mechanisms underlying decision making (DM) and learning in young adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) as well as the modulation of task-related and task-independent brain activation by methylphenidate. The study aims at using a double-blinded, placebo controlled, cross-over, withdrawal design to study the effects of ADHD and methylphenidate in both a behavioural study investigating cognitive effects on decision making and instrumental learning, and a functional MRI (fMRI) study investigating the effects on brain mechanisms during decision making alone. A secondary objective of the trial is to measure the effect of adult ADHD and methylphenidate on cerebral perfusion. This will be done through applying a novel arterial spin labelling MRI-technique on the participants in the fMRI arm of the study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Jun 2013
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 9, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 15, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2015
CompletedDecember 2, 2015
December 1, 2015
2 years
April 9, 2013
December 1, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Effect of ADHD medication on decision making
The study will both use standard statistical models on reaction time and accuracy data, but also use Bayesian Statistics and mathematical modelling. The investigators expect higher Drift Diffusion Model drift rate in the controls and patients on medication, and slower drift rate for participants off medication.
by may 2015 (up to 3 years)
Study Arms (2)
Behavioral
EXPERIMENTALCognitive testing of participants. Asterisk applies for patient group. Day 1: * Patient arrives having abstained medication for minimum 20 hours.\* * Administer either Ritalin or placebo intervention, and wait 60 minutes before computer-testing.\* * Case Report Form (CRF), ASRS and Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) subtests. * Blood sample, if consented.\* * Computerized testing. * Administer opposite treatment.\* Day 2: * Patient arrives having abstained medication for a minimum of 20 hours.\* * Administer either Ritalin or placebo intervention (opposite of Day 1), and wait 60 minutes before computer-testing.\* * CRF 3, ASRS and Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (EHI). * Blood sample, if consented.\* * Computerized testing. * Administer opposite treatment.\*
fMRI-arm
EXPERIMENTALAsterisk applies only for patient group. Day 1: * Patient arrives having abstained medication for minimum 20 hours.\* * Administer either Ritalin or placebo intervention, and wait 60 minutes before MRI testing.\* * CRF 2, Adult ASRS and WAIS subtests. * Blood sample, if consented.\* * Computerized testing. * Administer opposite treatment to ensure the patients have not been withheld from medication for too long while keeping blind.\* Day 2 (after 14 - 40 days): * Patient arrives having abstained medication for a minimum of 20 hours.\* * Administer either Ritalin or placebo intervention, and wait 60 minutes before testing (opposite of Day 1).\* * CRF 3, ASRS and EHI. * Blood sample, if consented.\* * Computerized testing. * Administer opposite treatment.\*
Interventions
On one of the two test-dates the patient participant is administered methylphenidate, in the dose prescribed by the patients doctor.
On one of the test-dates the patient participants are administered a sugar pill, matching their prescribes medical dose.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Drug-Naïve Group
- Comply with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) -IV criteria for ADHD.
- No history of medication with Methylphenidate.
- Must be between the age of 18 and 40.
- Signed informed consent and expected cooperation of the patients for the intervention and the test dates must be obtained and documented according to International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) Good Clinical Practice (GCP), and national/local regulations.
- After stable medication is established, these will be incorporated into the study following the procedures of the "drug group".
- Drug group
- Comply with DSM-IV criteria for ADHD.
- On stable treatment with MPH.
- Must be between the age of 18 and 40.
- Signed informed consent and expected cooperation of the patients for the intervention and the test dates must be obtained and documented according to ICH GCP, and national/local regulations.
- Healthy Control Group
- Must be between the age of 18 and 40.
- No current psychiatric diagnosis.
- Signed informed consent and expected cooperation of the patients for the intervention and the test dates must be obtained and documented according to ICH GCP, and national/local regulations.
You may not qualify if:
- Antidepressants (MOA-inhibitors, Tricyclic antidepressants, Selective Serotonin Re-uptake Inhibitors)
- Antipsychotics (both first and second generation)
- Anxiolytics/hypnotics (benzodiazepines, barbiturates)
- Opiates
- History of alcohol or drug abuse.
- History of moderate to severe head injury.
- Major psychiatric comorbidity (i.e. psychosis, active suicidal ideation or acute exacerbation of other psychiatric condition in need of immediate treatment).
- Epilepsy
- History of severe memory loss
- Under treatment for metabolic disorders
- Severe primary sensory loss
- MRI specific criteria: contraindications for MRI (i.e. metallic or circuit-containing implants, severe claustrophobia)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mats Fredriksenlead
- The Research Council of Norwaycollaborator
- The Hospital of Vestfoldcollaborator
- Norwegian Institute of Public Healthcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Department of Psychology, University of Oslo
Oslo, Oslo County, 0373, Norway
Adult ADHD diagnostic clinic, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust
Tønsberg, Tønsberg, 3103, Norway
Related Publications (1)
Mowinckel AM, Alnaes D, Pedersen ML, Ziegler S, Fredriksen M, Kaufmann T, Sonuga-Barke E, Endestad T, Westlye LT, Biele G. Increased default-mode variability is related to reduced task-performance and is evident in adults with ADHD. Neuroimage Clin. 2017 Mar 30;16:369-382. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.03.008. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 28861338DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mats Fredriksen, MD
Vestre Viken Hospital Trust and the University of Oslo
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Guido P Biele, PhD
University of Oslo
- STUDY CHAIR
Tor Endestad, PhD
University of Oslo
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Researcher MD, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 9, 2013
First Posted
April 15, 2013
Study Start
June 1, 2013
Primary Completion
June 1, 2015
Study Completion
June 1, 2015
Last Updated
December 2, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-12