NCT01830075

Brief Summary

Background: It is widely recognised that spiritual care plays an important role in physical and psychosocial well-being of cancer patients but there is little evidence based research on the effects of spiritual care. The investigators will conduct the first randomized controlled trial on spiritual care using a brief structured interview scheme supported by an e-application. The aim is to examine whether an assisted reflection on life events and ultimate life goals can improve quality of life of cancer patients. Design: Based on the findings of the investigators previous research, the investigators have developed a brief interview model that allows spiritual counselors to explore, explicate and discuss life events and ultimate life goals with cancer patients. To support the interview, the investigators created an e-application for a PC or a tablet. To examine whether this assisted reflection improves quality of life the investigators will conduct a randomized trial. Patients with advanced cancer not amenable to curative treatment options will be randomized to either the intervention or the control group. The intervention group will have two consultations with a spiritual counselor using the interview scheme supported by the e-application. The control group will receive care as usual. At baseline and one and three months after randomization all patients fill out questionnaires regarding quality of life, spiritual wellbeing, empowerment, satisfaction with life, anxiety and depression and health care consumption. Discussion: Having insight into one's ultimate life goals may help to cope with a life event such as cancer. This is the first randomized controlled trial to evaluate the role of an assisted structured reflection on ultimate life goals to improve patients' quality of life and spiritual well being. The intervention is brief and based on concepts and skills that spiritual counselors are familiar with, it can be easily implemented in routine patient care and incorporated in guidelines on spiritual care.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
153

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable quality-of-life

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2014

Typical duration for not_applicable quality-of-life

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 5, 2013

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 12, 2013

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2014

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

July 27, 2016

Status Verified

July 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

April 5, 2013

Last Update Submit

July 26, 2016

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Quality of life

    The EORTC QLQ C15 is a questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of palliative cancer care patients.

    4 months

  • Spiritual well being

    FACIT-Sp-12: Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Spiritual Well-Being; The 12-item Spiritual Well-Being Scale

    4 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • patients empowerment

    4 months

  • spirituality

    4 months

Other Outcomes (4)

  • anxiety and depression

    4 months

  • patients' health consumption

    4 months

  • patients'satisfaction with the intervention

    4 months

  • +1 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Control group

NO INTERVENTION

The control group receives care as usual.

Consultations

EXPERIMENTAL

An intervention of two consultations with a spiritual counselor supported by an e-application.

Behavioral: Consultations

Interventions

ConsultationsBEHAVIORAL

The patients receive two consultations with a spiritual counsellor. In these consultations life evens and life goals are discussed.

Consultations

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients ≥ 18 years of age with advanced cancer not amenable to curative treatment.
  • Life expectancy ≥ 6 months.

You may not qualify if:

  • Karnofsky Performance Score \< 60.
  • Insufficient command of the Dutch language to fill out Dutch questionnaires.
  • Current psychiatric disease

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Academic Medical Center

Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Kruizinga R, Scherer-Rath M, Schilderman JB, Hartog ID, Van Der Loos JP, Kotze HP, Westermann AM, Klumpen HJ, Kortekaas F, Grootscholten C, Bossink F, Schrama J, Van De Vrande W, Schrama NA, Blokland W, De Vos FY, Kuin A, Meijer WG, Van Oijen MG, Sprangers MA, Van Laarhoven HW. An assisted structured reflection on life events and life goals in advanced cancer patients: Outcomes of a randomized controlled trial (Life InSight Application (LISA) study). Palliat Med. 2019 Feb;33(2):221-231. doi: 10.1177/0269216318816005. Epub 2018 Dec 5.

  • Kruizinga R, Scherer-Rath M, Schilderman JB, Sprangers MA, Van Laarhoven HW. The life in sight application study (LISA): design of a randomized controlled trial to assess the role of an assisted structured reflection on life events and ultimate life goals to improve quality of life of cancer patients. BMC Cancer. 2013 Jul 26;13:360. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-360.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Referral and Consultation

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Professional PracticeOrganization and AdministrationHealth Services Administration

Study Officials

  • Hanneke WM Laarhoven, van, MD, PhD

    Acadamic Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD, PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 5, 2013

First Posted

April 12, 2013

Study Start

May 1, 2014

Primary Completion

March 1, 2016

Study Completion

March 1, 2016

Last Updated

July 27, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-07

Locations