Randomized Bioimpedance vs Clinical Methods in Guiding Ultrafiltration in Hemodialysis Patients
BIAHD
Bioimpedance Versus Clinical Methods in Guiding Ultrafiltration in Hemodialysis Patients: a Randomized Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
131
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The investigators developed a prospective, randomized, controlled trial to compare strict volume control using bioimpedance (using the BCM - Body Composition Monitor device) versus traditional clinical volume control in hemodialysis patients and the impact on mortality, hydration status, blood pressure values and arterial stiffness.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2008
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 7, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 10, 2013
CompletedOctober 16, 2013
October 1, 2013
2.4 years
April 7, 2013
October 13, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
All cause mortality
We assessed all-cause mortality in the two arms of the study at the end of intervention period.
2,5 years follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Arterial stiffness
3,5 years
Blood pressure values
2,5 years
Overhydration
2,5 years
Study Arms (2)
Clinical (control)
NO INTERVENTIONIn the clinical arm, dry weight and ultrafiltration prescription were done exclusively using traditional clinical methods of volume assessment.
Bioimpedance arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORStrict bioimpedance guided dry weight prescription arm. All patients dry weights were permanently maintained in the dry weight interval recommended by the BCM device (+/- 1,1 kg); BCM measurements were performed every 3 months.
Interventions
Post dialysis patient dry weight was exclusively prescribed using the ideal weight measured by the BCM device (+/- 1.1 Kg).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- older than 18-year
- on chronic hemodialysis for more than 3 months
You may not qualify if:
- \- life expectancy of less than 1 year
- Presence of a condition that may interfere with the determination of dry weight using the Body Composition Monitor (R):
- severe ascites (decompensated liver failure)
- limb amputations
- cardiac stent, pacemaker or defibrillator
- hip prosthetic
- pregnancy
- mental deficiency (impossibility to give consent)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Onofriescu M, Hogas S, Voroneanu L, Apetrii M, Nistor I, Kanbay M, Covic AC. Bioimpedance-guided fluid management in maintenance hemodialysis: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 Jul;64(1):111-8. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.01.420. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
PMID: 24583055DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Adrian Covic, Professor
University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, "Dr. C.I.Parhon" University Hospital Iasi, Nephrology Department
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor Dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 7, 2013
First Posted
April 10, 2013
Study Start
July 1, 2008
Primary Completion
December 1, 2010
Study Completion
December 1, 2011
Last Updated
October 16, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-10