NCT01826708

Brief Summary

For every child with developmental delay, the investigators do a constitutional karyotype. This karyotype can reveal an apparently balanced chromosomal rearrangement (no visible loss or gain of genetic material), such as a translocation between two or more chromosomes of accidental occurrence (not transmitted by parents). However, an apparently balanced translocation does not explain the phenotype of the child. Among the hypotheses that could explain the child's symptoms, there is the possibility of another chromosomal abnormality at the translocation breakpoints, another defect elsewhere on the chromosomes or gene disruption at or near the breakpoints. Because the resolution of a constitutional karyotype is limited, these microanomalies can go undiagnosed. The goal of this study is to look for a microanomaly on a chromosome using a technology of higher resolution than that of the conventional karyotype. The proposed study uses DNA microarray technology on DNA extracted from blood lymphocytes to perform high-resolution analysis of all chromosomes to search for an unbalanced microrearrangement (such as loss or gain of chromosomal material). If no microrearrangement is found, the investigators will pursue by looking for a gene disruption defect at or near the breakpoints involved in the translocation. This will be done by first isolating the chromosomes involved in the translocation by flow cytometry and then hybridizing each of the isolated chromosomes on a new microarray. The purpose of this study is to find a possible cause to explain the phenotype (microrearrangement or gene disruption).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
10

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for early_phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2011

Typical duration for early_phase_1

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2011

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 29, 2012

Completed
1 year until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 8, 2013

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 8, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 8, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

June 12, 2026

Status Verified

June 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

3.3 years

First QC Date

March 29, 2012

Last Update Submit

June 10, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Chromosomal translocationspsychomotor delay

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Evaluation of the proportion of cases for which a cause explaining the phenotype is found for patients with a apparently balance de novo translocation

    Evaluation of the proportion of cases for which a cause explaining the phenotype is found for patients with a apparently balance de novo translocation

    6 months and 2 years

Study Arms (1)

Psychomotor retardation syndromic

NO INTERVENTION

Psychomotor retardation syndromic by Identification of breakpoints

Biological: Identification of breakpoints

Interventions

Identification of breakpoints in Molecular Biology : demonstration of a chimeric sequence corresponding to a junction region between the two chromosomes

Psychomotor retardation syndromic

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • patient with syndromic psychomotor delay
  • patient with a apparently balanced de novo chromosomal translocation
  • patient with health insurance
  • informed consent signed by patient or by parents or by the legal representative for children

You may not qualify if:

  • patient with an inherited translocation

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Laboratory of Chromosomal Genetics - Universitary Hospital

Montpellier, 34295, France

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Gribble SM, Prigmore E, Burford DC, Porter KM, Ng BL, Douglas EJ, Fiegler H, Carr P, Kalaitzopoulos D, Clegg S, Sandstrom R, Temple IK, Youings SA, Thomas NS, Dennis NR, Jacobs PA, Crolla JA, Carter NP. The complex nature of constitutional de novo apparently balanced translocations in patients presenting with abnormal phenotypes. J Med Genet. 2005 Jan;42(1):8-16. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2004.024141.

    PMID: 15635069BACKGROUND
  • Yauy K, Schneider A, Ng BL, Gaillard JB, Sati S, Coubes C, Wells C, Tournaire M, Guignard T, Bouret P, Genevieve D, Puechberty J, Pellestor F, Gatinois V. Disruption of chromatin organisation causes MEF2C gene overexpression in intellectual disability: a case report. BMC Med Genomics. 2019 Aug 2;12(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12920-019-0558-8.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Translocation, GeneticLearning Disabilities

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Chromosome AberrationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsCommunication DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsNeurodevelopmental DisordersMental Disorders

Study Officials

  • Jacques MD Puechberty, PHD

    Laboratory of Chromosomal Genetics - Universitary Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
early phase 1
Allocation
NA
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 29, 2012

First Posted

April 8, 2013

Study Start

October 1, 2011

Primary Completion

January 8, 2015

Study Completion

January 8, 2015

Last Updated

June 12, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-06

Locations