Comparison of the Safety of Flublok® Versus Licensed IIV in Healthy, Medically Stable Adults ≥ 50 Years of Age
1 other identifier
interventional
2,640
1 country
14
Brief Summary
The hypothesis for this trial is that the incidence of a pre-defined composite of common systemic hypersensitivity adverse events for Flublok recipients is non-inferior to that reported for licensed IIV recipients. Another hypothesis is that the safety and reactogenicity of Flublok is clinically acceptable, i.e. consistent with the overall safety profiles previously observed with Flublok and with the licensed comparator.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Mar 2013
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
14 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 11, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 5, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 18, 2015
CompletedFebruary 18, 2015
January 1, 2015
2 months
March 11, 2013
December 19, 2014
January 29, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Common Hypersensitivity Reactions as Measure of Safety
Number of participants who experience a pre-defined common systemic hypersensitivity adverse event, including rash, urticaria, swelling or edema through Day 30 post-vaccine administration.
30 Days
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Subjects With at Least One Unsolicited Adverse Event in the 30 Days Following Vaccine Administration
30 Days
Number of Participants With Local and Systemic Events Reported as a Measure of Safety
7 Days
Subjects With at Least One Hypersensitivity Event Reported on Day 0 and Days 0-7 Following Vaccine Administration as a Measure of Safety
7 Days
Study Arms (2)
Flublok
ACTIVE COMPARATORFlublok containing 3x45µg (135µg total) of recombinant hemagglutinin (rHA) derived from influenza A/H1N1 and A/H3N2 and influenza B viruses in a total volume of 0.5 mL
Afluria
PLACEBO COMPARATORAfluria, containing 3x15µg (45µg total), of trivalent, inactivated influenza vaccine (licensed IIV) containing influenza antigen derived from A/H1N1 and A/H3N2 and influenza B viruses in a total volume of 0.5 mL
Interventions
A Biologics Licensing Application (BLA) for Flublok was approved by the FDA for influenza immunization of adults 18-49 years of age. Flublok is produced using recombinant technology under serum-free conditions.
Afluria is approved for use in persons 5 years of age and older and is produced by inactivation and disruption of live influenza virus grown in embryonated chicken eggs.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Ambulatory adults aged 50 years and older
- Medically stable, as determined by medical history and targeted physical examination based on medical history, if appropriate
- Able to understand and comply with planned study procedures
- Provides written informed consent prior to initiation of any study procedure.
You may not qualify if:
- Known contraindication to either study vaccine (see product package inserts)
- Receipt of any other influenza or other vaccine within 30 days prior to enrollment in this study.
- Receipt of any new medication within 30 days prior to enrollment in this study
- Plans to participate in any investigation involving an investigational product during this study.
- Pre-existence of atopic dermatitis or any other cutaneous disorder that could complicate the evaluation of potential primary endpoints.
- Any clinical or social circumstance that in the opinion of the investigator could interfere with compliance with study procedures or interfere with the interpretation of clinical data.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (14)
Genova Clinical Research
Tucson, Arizona, 85704-1152, United States
Clinical Research of South Florida
Coral Gables, Florida, 33134, United States
Meridian Clinical Research
Savannah, Georgia, 31406, United States
Heartland Research Associates, LLC
Wichita, Kansas, 67207, United States
Benchmark Research
Metairie, Louisiana, 70006, United States
Maine Research Associates, LLC
Auburn, Maine, 04210, United States
Meridian Clinical Research
Omaha, Nebraska, 68164, United States
Clinical Research Center of Nevada, LLC
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89104, United States
Regional Clinical Research
Binghamton, New York, 13901, United States
Wake Research
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27612, United States
Rapid Medical Research, Inc.
Cleveland, Ohio, 44122, United States
Research Across America
Dallas, Texas, 75234, United States
Benchmark Research
Fort Worth, Texas, 76135, United States
Benchmark Research
San Angelo, Texas, 76904, United States
Related Publications (1)
Izikson R, Leffell DJ, Bock SA, Patriarca PA, Post P, Dunkle LM, Cox MM. Randomized comparison of the safety of Flublok((R)) versus licensed inactivated influenza vaccine in healthy, medically stable adults >/= 50 years of age. Vaccine. 2015 Nov 27;33(48):6622-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.10.097. Epub 2015 Nov 1.
PMID: 26529070DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Rash, urticaria, swelling and edema were self-reported by subjects and most were not observed by investigators. Review by independent experts indicated that 42 of 52 subject-reported events did not represent Type 1 (IgE-mediated) hypersensitivity.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Lisa M. Dunkle, M.D., Chief Medical Officer
- Organization
- Protein Sciences Corporation
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Brandon Essink, MD
Meridian Clinical Research
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Paul Bradley, MD
Meridian Clinical Research
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
William Seger, MD
Benchmark Research
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Darrell Herrington, DO
Benchmark Research
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
George Bauer, MD
Benchmark Research
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Frank Eder, MD
Regional Clinical Research
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Treva Tyson, MD
Wake Research
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bob Weiss, MD
Maine Research Associates, LLC
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jeffrey Rosen, MD
Clinical Research of South Florida
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joe Blumenau, MD
Research Across America
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Steven Folkerth, MD
Clinical Research Center of Nevada, LLC
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Leah Schmidt, DO
Genova Clinical Research
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Eric Sheldon
Miami Research Associates
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alan C. Wine, MD
Rapid Medical Research, Inc.
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Terry Poling, MD
Heartland Research Associates, LLC
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 11, 2013
First Posted
April 5, 2013
Study Start
March 1, 2013
Primary Completion
May 1, 2013
Study Completion
May 1, 2013
Last Updated
February 18, 2015
Results First Posted
February 18, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-01