Recognizing Ventricular Fibrillation From an Area of a Mobile Phone
1 other identifier
observational
22
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Recognition of out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) during an emergency call is based on standardized questions concerning the symptoms of OHCA. With this method cardiac arrest is recognized in 50-83% of cases. When the emergency medical dispatcher identifies cardiac arrest during the emergency call the survival of the patient improves. Accurate emergency medical service response is activated promptly and bystander will receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) instructions. It has been estimated that proper implementation of CPR instructions will save thousands of lives each year. If the ECG could be recorded by the mobile phone, transmitted during the emergency call to the dispatch centre and analysed there with the software of a semi-automated external defibrillator(AED), the recognition of cardiac arrest could be more accurate. The aim of this study is to examine, if AED, with minimal size electrodes within an area of a mobile phone, is able to recognize reliably ventricular fibrillation (VF), the rhythm with the best prognosis in OHCA.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Nov 2013
Typical duration for all trials
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 27, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 4, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2016
CompletedMarch 23, 2016
March 1, 2016
2.3 years
March 27, 2013
March 22, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The ability of AED to recognise induced VF
The ability of AED to correctly recognise ventricular fibrillation from a bipolar ECG recorded within an area of mobile phone: is the recognition good enough to automatically divide the rhythm correctly into categories of shockable and non-shockable?
24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Quality of VF
24 hour
Study Arms (1)
ICD-patients
Patients to whom cardiac fibrillation will be induced during the implantation of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or patients with an already implanted ICD, which function needs to be revised and during the revision cardiac defibrillation will be induced.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with severe dysrhytmia and the necessity to an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)
You may qualify if:
- age over 18
- ventricular fibrillation will be induced during the implantation or revision of ICD
- patient's informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- ventricular fibrillation will not be induced during the implantation or revision of ICD
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- North Karelia Central Hospitallead
- Kuopio University Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
North Karelia Central Hospital
Joensuu, 80210, Finland
Kuopio University Hospital
Kuopio, 70211, Finland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Helena Jäntti, MD, PhD
Kuopio University Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sakari Syväoja, MD
North Karelia Central Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 27, 2013
First Posted
April 4, 2013
Study Start
November 1, 2013
Primary Completion
March 1, 2016
Study Completion
March 1, 2016
Last Updated
March 23, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-03