NCT01823692

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether ultrasonography guidance compare with the simple radiography aids in determining the adequacy of distal radius fracture reduction.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
184

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2011

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2011

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2011

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2011

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 30, 2013

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 4, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

April 4, 2013

Status Verified

March 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

Same day

First QC Date

March 30, 2013

Last Update Submit

April 2, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

Radius FractureSensitivityReductionAdequacy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • adequacy of distal radius fracture reduction

    after manipulation and reduction were performed by single emergency medicine specialist under Bier block regional anesthesia or procedural sedation-analgesia, The ultrasonography was performed by the single emergency department physician in a long axis both in a anterioposterior and lateral views in determining whether the distal and proximal distal to a fracture was in a straight line (less than 3 mm difference) or not?

    at 5 min after admission time

Study Arms (1)

Distal Radius Fracture

OTHER

after manipulation and reduction were performed by single emergency medicine specialist under Bier block regional anesthesia or procedural sedation-analgesia, The ultrasonography was performed by the single emergency department physician in a long axis both in a anterioposterior and lateral views in determining whether the distal and proximal distal to a fracture was in a straight line (less than 3 mm difference) or not?

Other: ultrasonography

Interventions

after manipulation and reduction were performed by single emergency medicine specialist under Bier block regional anesthesia or procedural sedation-analgesia, The ultrasonography was performed by the single emergency department physician in a long axis both in a anterioposterior and lateral views in determining whether the distal and proximal distal to a fracture was in a straight line (less than 3 mm difference) or not?

Distal Radius Fracture

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • \> 21 years old and a diagnosing of a distal radius fracture based on simple radiography.

You may not qualify if:

  • Open fractures
  • more than 20 degree angulation
  • joint internal involvement, communicated and along with Neurovascular compromised fractures
  • patient's surgery due to other causes
  • need to stay in the ICU and not being able to be treated at the same time for distal radius fracture
  • patient's refusal to participate in the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Al-Zahra University Hospital

Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Wrist FracturesRadius FracturesHypersensitivity

Interventions

High-Energy Shock Waves

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Wrist InjuriesArm InjuriesWounds and InjuriesFractures, BoneForearm InjuriesImmune System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Ultrasonic WavesSoundRadiation, NonionizingRadiationPhysical Phenomena

Study Officials

  • Hamidreza Shemshaki, MD

    Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
NA
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD, Research Assistant

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 30, 2013

First Posted

April 4, 2013

Study Start

September 1, 2011

Primary Completion

September 1, 2011

Study Completion

September 1, 2011

Last Updated

April 4, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-03

Locations