Outpatient Reduction of Nocturnal Hypoglycemia by Using Predictive Algorithms and Pump Suspension in Children
PSO4
2 other identifiers
interventional
97
2 countries
3
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to see whether low blood sugar at night can be reduced by using a system that turns off the insulin pump automatically. The study system includes a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) and an insulin pump. The CGM and pump work with a regular laptop computer. A The system works by (1) measuring the glucose levels under the skin with the CGM, (2) using a computer program on the laptop to predict whether a low blood sugar is likely to occur, and (3) turning off the insulin pump when the computer program predicts that a low blood sugar will occur. We have tested the system in the home environment in individuals with type 1 diabetes age 15 years and older. We have found an indication that the system can decrease the frequency of hypoglycemia. We have not had any serious cases of high blood sugars or other problems. We are now ready to further test the system in the home environment in a younger age group to learn more about its ability to reduce overnight low blood sugar risk. This study has several phases and will take about 3 months for a patient to complete.
- First, the patient will use the CGM and pump at home for up to 15 days with the help of a parent/guardian. This is done to determine if the patient meets our study criteria to proceed with the next phase of the study.
- If the patient is eligible to continue in the study, the patient will need to use the full study system for at least 5 nights at home with the help of a parent/guardian. This is done to make sure the patient and parent/guardian are able to use the system correctly. The patient may participate in starting and stopping the system at home, but the parent/guardian is responsible for making sure it is used as instructed.
- After that, the patient will be asked to use the study system each night for an additional 6 to 8 weeks. The parent/guardian will remain responsible for making sure the system is used as instructed. The study will include about 90 individuals with type 1 diabetes at 3 clinical centers in the United States and Canada. First a study of children 8 to less than 15 years old will be done. Then, a study of children 3 to less than 8 years old will be conducted.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started May 2013
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 29, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 4, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 24, 2015
CompletedAugust 30, 2016
August 1, 2016
1.3 years
March 29, 2013
June 25, 2015
August 26, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Comparison of the Time Spent in Hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dl, 3.9 mmol/L) Overnight on Intervention Nights Versus Control Nights, Normalized to an 8-hour Period.
Each night is categorized as to whether hypoglycemia occurred. Hypoglycemia is defined as the occurrence of one or more CGM glucose values ≤70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L). The time period for outcome assessment each night will be from the time the system is activated in the evening until the time it is deactivated in the morning. The percentage of hypoglycemic nights (CGM glucose value ≤70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L)) will be tabulated separately with versus without the closed-loop control system in use. We considered nights with at least 4 hours of sensor glucose data as a "valid" night toward the 42 night overall goal and thus our final analyses had a slightly higher number of nights than expected.
Overnight from system activation to deactivation in the morning upon awakening for 42 nights of system use.
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Percentage of Nights With 1 or More Sensor Glucose Values <70 mg/dL (<3.9 mmol/L)
Overnight from system activation to deactivation in the morning upon awakening for 42 nights of system use.
Percentage of Nights With 1 or More Sensor Glucose Values <50 mg/dL (<2.8 mmol/L)
Overnight from system activation to deactivation in the morning upon awakening for 42 nights of system use
Mean Sensor Glucose Overnight
Overnight from system activation to deactivation in the morning upon awakening for 42 nights of system use
Percentage of Time Overnight Sensor Glucose Values 71 to 180 mg/dL (3.9 to 10.0 mmol/L), Normalized to an 8-hour Period.
Overnight from system activation to deactivation in the morning upon awakening for 42 nights of system use
Percentage of Overnight Time Spent With CGM Value >250 mg/dL (13.9 mmol/L), Normalized to an 8-hour Period.
Overnight from system activation to deactivation in the morning upon awakening for 42 nights of system use
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Pump suspension algorithm
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe pump suspension algorithm will be running actively on the study laptop during the night and suspend the pump if the algorithm predicts hypoglycemia.
Standard of Care
NO INTERVENTIONThe control algorithm will run passively and not suspend the patient's pump.
Interventions
The study laptop will communicate to the pump causing a suspension based on output from the algorithm which predicts hypoglycemia.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes and using daily insulin therapy for at least one year and an insulin infusion pump for at least 6 months
- Age 3 to \<15 years
- HbA1c \<=8.5%
- Availability of internet access for periodic upload of study data
You may not qualify if:
- Diabetic ketoacidosis in the past 3 months
- Hypoglycemic seizure or loss of consciousness in past 6 months
- History of seizure disorder (except for hypoglycemic seizures)
- Cystic fibrosis
- Current use of oral/inhaled glucocorticoids, beta-blockers or other medications, which in the judgment of the investigator would be a contraindication to participation in the study
- History of ongoing renal disease (other than microalbuminuria), or liver disease (Creatinine is \> 1.5 mg/dL (132 µmol/L))
- Medical or psychiatric condition that in the judgment of the investigator might interfere with the completion of the protocol such as:
- Inpatient psychiatric treatment in the past 6 months
- Uncontrolled adrenal disorder
- Abuse of alcohol
- Pregnancy
- Liver disease as defined by an Alanine Aminotransferase Test (ALT) greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Stanford University
Stanford, California, 94305, United States
Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
St. Joseph's Health Care
London, Ontario, N6A4V2, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Buckingham BA, Raghinaru D, Cameron F, Bequette BW, Chase HP, Maahs DM, Slover R, Wadwa RP, Wilson DM, Ly T, Aye T, Hramiak I, Clarson C, Stein R, Gallego PH, Lum J, Sibayan J, Kollman C, Beck RW; In Home Closed Loop Study Group. Predictive Low-Glucose Insulin Suspension Reduces Duration of Nocturnal Hypoglycemia in Children Without Increasing Ketosis. Diabetes Care. 2015 Jul;38(7):1197-204. doi: 10.2337/dc14-3053. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
PMID: 26049549RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Only selected participants prone to nocturnal hypoglycemia and only tested one continuous glucose sensor. Participants didn't know if system was active before activation so could not observe what would happen if the participants knew it was.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Judy Sibayan, MPH, CCRP
- Organization
- Jaeb Center for Health Research
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Roy W Beck, MD, PhD
Jaeb Center for Health Research
- STUDY CHAIR
Bruce A Buckingham, MD
Stanford University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
John Lum, MS
Jaeb Center for Health Research
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 29, 2013
First Posted
April 4, 2013
Study Start
May 1, 2013
Primary Completion
September 1, 2014
Study Completion
September 1, 2014
Last Updated
August 30, 2016
Results First Posted
August 24, 2015
Record last verified: 2016-08