Risky Decision Making in Methamphetamine Users: The Role of Opioid Blockade
2 other identifiers
interventional
76
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of this protocol is to learn more about impulsive decision making in people who use methamphetamines. The investigators would like to know if a medication called naltrexone changes how people make decisions. The investigators would also like to know whether changes in decision making can be observed by MRI (magnetic resonance imaging). The research is conducted in Portland, OR.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2013
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 21, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 2, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 6, 2019
CompletedMarch 5, 2019
February 1, 2019
1.8 years
March 21, 2013
September 20, 2017
February 12, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Discounting Tasks: Sexual Probability Discounting (SexPD)
In the SexPD task, subjects are asked to choose between having sex with a more appealing partner with a varying chance of having a sexually transmitted infection (STI) or a less appealing partner with no STI. A hyperbolic decay model was used to calculate h, a free parameter that indexes the rate of probabilistic discounting. Smaller h values indicate a preference for probabilistic (i.e., riskier) outcomes. To normalize the data, the natural log of h values were calculated and reported here.
28 days post drug intervention
Discounting Tasks: Standard Delay Discounting (DD)
Monetary delay discounting task consisted of choosing between a larger, delayed and a smaller, immediate reward. A hyperbolic decay model was used to calculate k, a free parameter that indexes the rate of delay discounting. As k values are typically skewed across subjects, the distribution of k was normalized by using a natural log transformation. The normalized values are reported here. If k typically ranges between 0.5 and 10\^-5, then the natural log of k will range between -0.69 and -11.5. Larger normalized k values indicate a preference for smaller sooner outcomes (i.e., more impulsive decision-making).
28 days post drug intervention
Barrat Impulsiveness Scale (BIS)
The Barrat Impulsiveness Scale (BIS) is a 30 item questionnaire to measure a persons impulsiveness. Items are answered on a 4-point scale and scored 1-4 then summed across responses. Total scores range from 30-120 with a higher summed score indicating higher impulsivity.
28 days post drug intervention
Risk Assessment Battery (RAB)
The Risk Assessment Battery (RAB) is a 26 question self-administered assessment focusing on drug use, injection and sexual risk during the past 30 days. Three composite HIV risk scores (drug, sex, and total score) are calculated. The questions have different numbers of items, and scores for a single question can range from 0 to 7, with higher values reflecting more instances of risk behavior. The drug risk score has a range of 0 to 22 and is calculated from 8 questions that address recent substance use, including frequency, needle sharing, and cleaning of the "works." 9 questions are used to calculate a sex risk score that has a range of 0 to 18, and these questions address the frequency and types of sexual behavior, HIV status of sexual partners, and type of protection that was used (if any). Total score is calculated by adding drug and sex scores and dividing by 40, the maximum score possible, and ranges from 0 to 40 where higher scores indicate greater risk behavior.
28 days post drug intervention
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Methamphetamine Use
28 days post drug intervention
Study Arms (2)
Extended release naltrexone
EXPERIMENTALOne dose of intramuscular injection of 380mg extended-release naltrexone.
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATOROne dose of intramuscular injection of placebo.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM)-IV Methamphetamine Dependence
- Deemed healthy enough to participate by study physician
- Age 18-55
- Right handed
- English-speaking
You may not qualify if:
- Current opioid use in the last 30 days; opioid abuse or dependence within past 5 years
- Pregnancy
- MRI contraindications (e.g. metal in head).
- The research is conducted in Portland, OR.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
Portland VA Medical Center
Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
Related Publications (2)
Kohno M, Morales AM, Dennis LE, McCready H, Hoffman WF, Korthuis PT. Effects of Naltrexone on Large-Scale Network Interactions in Methamphetamine Use Disorder. Front Psychiatry. 2019 Sep 3;10:603. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00603. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31551824DERIVEDKohno M, Dennis LE, McCready H, Schwartz DL, Hoffman WF, Korthuis PT. A preliminary randomized clinical trial of naltrexone reduces striatal resting state functional connectivity in people with methamphetamine use disorder. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Nov 1;192:186-192. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.07.045. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
PMID: 30266003DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Todd Korthuis
- Organization
- Oregon Health & Science University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Philip T Korthuis, MD, MPH
Oregon Health and Science University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 21, 2013
First Posted
April 2, 2013
Study Start
May 1, 2013
Primary Completion
March 1, 2015
Study Completion
March 1, 2015
Last Updated
March 5, 2019
Results First Posted
February 6, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-02