Comparative Study Between Two Physiotherapy Protocols Conventional X Accelerated in Individuals Undergoing Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament.
1 other identifier
interventional
29
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The accelerated rehabilitation and early return does not seem to be harmful, but still needs further research to define the rehabilitation time is what shows Kruse and collaborators (2012) in their study of systematic review. The surgical treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injury is the gold standard in the treatment of these injuries in young and active, the postoperative rehabilitation is extensive and full return to sport occurs only after 6 months postoperatively. Based on this gap, the investigators seek to draw properly through our study methods and more complex techniques, that comparing two rehabilitation programs can achieve high precision early rehabilitation. This will include 32 athletes who had complete ACL rupture confirmed by MRI and underwent ACL reconstruction using patellar tendon.All subjects will be followed from the pre-surgery, the fourth and sixth month after surgery with: KT1000 measures the ligamentous laxity, knee function by applying the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC 2000); Isokinetic Muscle Strength (Cybex). Through a random draw of sealed envelopes, patients will be allocated in their rehabilitation groups: Accelerated (4 months) or Conventional (6 months). Preoperatively, fourth and sixth month after surgery will be an assessment of laxity by (KT1000), Muscular Strength (CYBEX) and knee function affected by IKDC (2000) and Hop Test. The assessor and the patients were blinded to treatment group. This study will have the locus Institute of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, School of Medicine, São Paulo. The comparative results of the two groups are analyzed using specific statistical tests to prove an improved significative without damaging the integrity of the graft.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2013
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 20, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2015
CompletedApril 14, 2015
December 1, 2014
2.2 years
March 20, 2013
April 12, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
KT1000 measures
Measure of anterior knee stability
Sixth months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC 2000)
Sixth months
Hop Test measures
sixth months
Isokinetic of the knee measures
sixth months
Study Arms (2)
Conventional group
ACTIVE COMPARATORNonaccelerated Rehabilitation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Accelerated group
EXPERIMENTALAccelerated Rehabilitation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Interventions
Nonaccelerated Rehabilitation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in 6 months of recovery.
Accelerated Rehabilitation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in 4 months of recovery.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- With diagnosis of injury (primary) anterior cruciate ligament confirmed by magnetic resonance may or may not be associated with a meniscal injury or partial ligament medial collateral ligament (MCL) surgery is not indicated.
- Patients undergo surgery for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who had changes in diagnosis during surgery.
- Surgical complications
- Patients with More than 30% of lack or abandon physiotherapy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine of São Paulo
São Paulo, São Paulo, 03403-010, Brazil
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
José Carlos Fabrício
University of Sao Paulo
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Roberto Mota
University of Sao Paulo
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Specialist, Master Student
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 20, 2013
First Posted
April 1, 2013
Study Start
January 1, 2013
Primary Completion
March 1, 2015
Study Completion
April 1, 2015
Last Updated
April 14, 2015
Record last verified: 2014-12