Phase 3b Study of Metvix NDL-PDT Versus Metvix c-PDT in Subjects With Actinic Keratoses
COMET2
Multi-centre, Randomized, Investigator-blind, Intra-individual Active and Vehicle-controlled Study, Comparing Metvix Natural Daylight Photodynamic Therapy Versus Metvix Conventional Photodynamic Therapy in Subjects With Actinic Keratosis
1 other identifier
interventional
131
5 countries
18
Brief Summary
This study was to be conducted as a multi-centre, randomized, investigator-blinded, active and vehicle-controlled, intra-individual (split-face/scalp) non-inferiority (regarding efficacy) and superiority (regarding pain) study. The primary purpose of this study is to demonstrate the non-inferiority of NDL-PDT compared to c-PDT in terms of lesion complete response rate.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Jul 2013
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
18 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 27, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 10, 2020
CompletedFebruary 18, 2021
February 1, 2018
6 months
March 27, 2013
February 15, 2018
February 16, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage (%) Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Complete Response at Week 12 in Group 1
The lesion complete response rate was defined as the percentage of pre-existing and treated lesions at Baseline that were assessed as clear (complete disappearance of the lesion, visually and by palpation) at Week 12. New lesions or the lesions in non-complete response were not not considered in the lesion response assessment. This outcome measure was analyzed as an intra-individual comparison between Metvix NDL-PDT on one side of the face/scalp and Metvix vehicle cream (placebo) c-PDT on the contralateral side (Group I).
Baseline, Week 12
Study Arms (2)
NDL-PDT/c-PDT
EXPERIMENTALMetvix natural daylight photodynamic therapy and Metvix conventional photodynamic therapy
NDL-PDT/placebo c-PDT
EXPERIMENTALMetvix natural daylight photodynamic therapy and Metvix-placebo conventional photodynamic therapy
Interventions
Metvix natural daylight photodynamic therapy
Metvix placebo conventional photodynamic therapy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinical diagnosis of mild (Grade 1) and/or moderate (Grade 2) AKs on the face or the scalp on treated areas
- Subject with two symmetrical treated areas half scalps or two half faces excluding ears, chin, bridge of the nose, eyelids and lips inside the vermillion border): no more than a twofold difference in terms of total number of lesions between the two TAs
You may not qualify if:
- Subject with clinical diagnosis of at least one severe (Grade 3) AK on treated areas
- Subject with pigmented AK on the treated areas
- Immuno-compromised Subject for idiopathic, disease specific or therapeutic reasons
- Subject with porphyria,
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Galderma R&Dlead
Study Sites (18)
Investigative site
Montpellier, France
Investigational site
Nantes, France
Investigational site
Nice, France
Investigational site
Paris, France
Investigative site
Rennes, France
Investigational site
Aachen, Germany
Investigational site
Berlin, Germany
Investigational site
Münster, Germany
Investigational site
Recklinghausen, Germany
Investigational site
Assen, Netherlands
Investigational site
Maastricht, Netherlands
Investigational site
Nijmegen, Netherlands
Investigational site
Huesca, Spain
Investigational site
Madrid, Spain
Investigative site
Pamplona, Spain
Investigational site
Valencia, Spain
Investigational site
Karlskoga, Sweden
Investigational site
Norrköping, Sweden
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- CTA Coordinator
- Organization
- Galderma R&D SNC
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nicole Basset Seguin, PhD, MD
Hopital Saint Louis France
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bibiana Perez Garcia, MD
Hospital Ramón y Cajal Spain
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rianne Gerritsen, PhD, MD
Radboud University, Nijmegen Medical Center The Netherlands
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rolf-Markus Sziemies, PhD, MD
Klinik fur Dermatologie und Allergologie Germany
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ingrid Synnerstad, PhD, MD
Hudmottagningen Sweden
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 27, 2013
First Posted
April 1, 2013
Study Start
July 1, 2013
Primary Completion
January 1, 2014
Study Completion
March 1, 2014
Last Updated
February 18, 2021
Results First Posted
December 10, 2020
Record last verified: 2018-02