Adductor Canal Block for Medial Compartment Knee Arthroplasty
Evaluation of Ultrasound-Guided Adductor Canal Blockade for Postoperative Analgesia Following Robotic Medial Unicompartmental Knee Replacement
1 other identifier
interventional
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will evaluate the affects of a single injection ultrasound-guided adductor canal block for patients undergoing robotic-assisted (MAKOplasty) medial UKA (unicompartmental knee arthroplasty). Specifically, this study will compare the adequacy of postoperative analgesia provided by the adductor canal block with that provided by single injection lumbar plexus blockade. The working hypothesis is that the analgesia provided by the adductor canal block will be equivalent to the analgesia provided by the lumbar plexus block. The primary outcome will be a comparison of verbal numerical pain scores at rest and with movement over the first 24 hours following nerve blockade.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Apr 2013
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 21, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 26, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 13, 2018
CompletedSeptember 13, 2018
September 1, 2018
2.1 years
March 21, 2013
August 14, 2018
September 12, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Verbal Pain Scores at 6 Hours Post Nerve Blockade.
Comparison of verbal numerical pain scores at rest and with movement 6 hours following nerve blockade. The score range is 0-10 with higher scores denoting worse outcomes.
6 hours post block.
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Opioid Consumption
6, 12, 18, and 24 hours
Time to First Analgesic
24 hours
Opioid Related Side Effects
6, 12, 18, and 24 hours
Quadriceps Motor Strength
6 hours
Study Arms (2)
Adductor canal block
EXPERIMENTALPatients in this arm will receive an adductor canal block prior to undergoing a medial compartment knee arthroplasty.
Lumbar plexus block
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in this arm will receive a lumbar plexus block prior to undergoing a medial compartment knee arthroplasty.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged 18-85
- Undergoing unilateral robotic-assisted (MAKOplasty) medial compartment knee arthroplasty at Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center.
- Must give written informed consent for anesthesia including subarachnoid blockade and peripheral nerve blockade of both the lumbar plexus and adductor canal.
- Must consent to the performance of a sham block at the site to which they are not randomized.
- Must also be reliable to give accurate verbal pain scores postoperatively.
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindication to adductor canal blockade or lumbar plexus blockade (including significant coagulation abnormalities)
- History of opioid addiction or current chronic pain therapy for pain other than at the surgical site that is being treated with high-dose opioids (extended release opioids or \> 40mg oxycodone equivalents per day)
- Allergy to study medications
- Failure to adequately place either the adductor canal or lumbar plexus blocks.
- Patients who decline or have a contraindication to subarachnoid blockade will also be excluded from the study.
- Pregnancy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States
Related Publications (10)
Meek RM, Masri BA, Duncan CP. Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement: rationale and correct indications. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004 Apr;35(2):191-200. doi: 10.1016/S0030-5898(03)00115-9.
PMID: 15062705BACKGROUNDRiddle DL, Jiranek WA, McGlynn FJ. Yearly incidence of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Apr;23(3):408-12. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.04.012. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
PMID: 18358380BACKGROUNDKurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Apr;89(4):780-5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222.
PMID: 17403800BACKGROUNDGARDNER E. The innervation of the knee joint. Anat Rec. 1948 May;101(1):109-30. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091010111. No abstract available.
PMID: 18915634BACKGROUNDDavis JJ, Bond TS, Swenson JD. Adductor canal block: more than just the saphenous nerve? Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Nov-Dec;34(6):618-9. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181bfbf00. No abstract available.
PMID: 19901788BACKGROUNDHorner G, Dellon AL. Innervation of the human knee joint and implications for surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Apr;(301):221-6.
PMID: 8156678BACKGROUNDJenstrup MT, Jaeger P, Lund J, Fomsgaard JS, Bache S, Mathiesen O, Larsen TK, Dahl JB. Effects of adductor-canal-blockade on pain and ambulation after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Mar;56(3):357-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02621.x. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
PMID: 22221014BACKGROUNDLund J, Jenstrup MT, Jaeger P, Sorensen AM, Dahl JB. Continuous adductor-canal-blockade for adjuvant post-operative analgesia after major knee surgery: preliminary results. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011 Jan;55(1):14-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2010.02333.x. Epub 2010 Oct 29.
PMID: 21039357BACKGROUNDFarrar JT, Berlin JA, Strom BL. Clinically important changes in acute pain outcome measures: a validation study. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2003 May;25(5):406-11. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(03)00162-3.
PMID: 12727037BACKGROUNDSchuirmann DJ. A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1987 Dec;15(6):657-80. doi: 10.1007/BF01068419.
PMID: 3450848BACKGROUND
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Daryl Henshaw
- Organization
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Daryl S Henshaw, MD
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 21, 2013
First Posted
March 26, 2013
Study Start
April 1, 2013
Primary Completion
May 1, 2015
Study Completion
May 1, 2015
Last Updated
September 13, 2018
Results First Posted
September 13, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-09