Safety and Efficacy of Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory (NSAI)Drug and Glucocorticoids in Acute Sciatica
TéAGS
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether anti-inflammatory drugs or glucocorticoids are effective in the treatment of acute sciatica
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jan 2013
Typical duration for phase_4
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 14, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 22, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2016
CompletedMarch 24, 2016
March 1, 2016
2.9 years
March 14, 2013
March 23, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mean visual analogue scale (VAS) for leg pain (radicular pain) in 3 groups
VAS is measured in millimiters (0 to 100). This pain score is recommended in rheumatologic units in France.
From day 0 to day 5
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Mean visual analogue scale (VAS) for back pain in 3 groups
From day 0 to day 5
Assess drug compliance
From day 0 to day 5
The effect of treatment on the EIFEL Questionnaire
At baseline, 1 and 3 months after intervention
Improvement in Lasegue's sign compared to baseline
At baseline, Day 1,2,3,4 and 5 of study period
Assess Schober's test
From Day 0 to Day 5
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
methylprednisolone
ACTIVE COMPARATORadministration of 60 mg of methylprednisolone at 8:00 am and 100 ml of 0.9 % sodium chloride (placebo) at 6:00 pm
Ketoprofen
ACTIVE COMPARATORadministration of 100 mg of ketoprofen at 8:00 am and at 6:00 pm
sodium chloride
PLACEBO COMPARATORadministration of 100 ml of 0.9% sodium chloride (placebo) at 8:00 am and at 6:00 pm
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- sciatica \<8 weeks resistant to all treatments in ambulatory
- Acute low back pain\> 48 hours;
- Non-deficit patients;
- Initial VAS\> 40/100;
- Consent of patient
- Conflict disco-radicular concordance with the clinical computed tomography scan or magnetic resonance imaging.
- No of contraindications to methylprednisolone, ketoprofen;
- No registration to another protocol;
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant, parturient, lactating mother;
- Diabetic patient;
- Patient with syndrome from narrowing of the lumbar vertebral canal
- Patient with a history of lumbar surgery \<1 year;
- Patient with a Cauda equina syndrome or major motor disability;
- Crural neuralgia
- Patient with a deficit;
- Suspicion of sciatica secondary, ie not conflict-related disco-root: infectious neuritis, fracture on spinal bone tumor ...
- associated treatment or pathology contra-indicating administration methylprednisolone, ketoprofen.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
CHU Hôpital Sud
Échirolles, 38130, France
CH d'Uriage
Uriage-les-Bains, 38410, France
Related Publications (5)
Roncoroni C, Baillet A, Durand M, Gaudin P, Juvin R. Efficacy and tolerance of systemic steroids in sciatica: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011 Sep;50(9):1603-11. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker151. Epub 2011 Apr 27.
PMID: 21525139BACKGROUNDChou R, Huffman LH; American Pain Society; American College of Physicians. Medications for acute and chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 2;147(7):505-14. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-7-200710020-00008.
PMID: 17909211BACKGROUNDVroomen PC, de Krom MC, Slofstra PD, Knottnerus JA. Conservative treatment of sciatica: a systematic review. J Spinal Disord. 2000 Dec;13(6):463-9. doi: 10.1097/00002517-200012000-00001.
PMID: 11132976BACKGROUNDKoes BW, Scholten RJ, Mens JM, Bouter LM. Efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for low back pain: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials. Ann Rheum Dis. 1997 Apr;56(4):214-23. doi: 10.1136/ard.56.4.214.
PMID: 9165992BACKGROUNDLuijsterburg PA, Verhagen AP, Ostelo RW, van Os TA, Peul WC, Koes BW. Effectiveness of conservative treatments for the lumbosacral radicular syndrome: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2007 Jul;16(7):881-99. doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0367-1. Epub 2007 Apr 6.
PMID: 17415595BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 14, 2013
First Posted
March 22, 2013
Study Start
January 1, 2013
Primary Completion
December 1, 2015
Study Completion
January 1, 2016
Last Updated
March 24, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-03