The Analgesic Effect of Nefopam on the Fentanyl Based PCA (Patient-controlled Analgesia) After Lumbar Spinal Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
54
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Posterior lumbar spinal surgical pain leads to a severe degree of pain, and, hence, various means of pain management are required. Opioid pain medications such as morphine and fentanyl are frequently used as intravenously administered medications. To reduce the use of opioids for pain relief, a non-opioid form of pain relief, such as a Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID), is often added to the regimen. With the use of NSAIDs, however, the risk of systemic side effects such as bleeding, gastroduodenal bleeding, and kidney damage are being reported, and there is also a report of inhibition of spinal fusion; these risks limit the use of NSAIDs. Nefopam, a new centrally-acting analgesic agent, has been reported in an animal study to desensitize post-surgical pain, and when used with an opioid analgesic, it indirectly controlled the NMDA receptor, which inhibited the generation of c-fos gene at the spine. There are also reports that Nefopam managed pain by inhibiting the serotonin reuptake receptors. In clinical practice, the administration of Nefopam in patients who required post-surgical pain management reduced the use of opioid analgesics by 20-50 % and also reduced the prevalence of nausea and vomiting. Therefore, the investigators considered whether the addition of Nefopam for intravenous patient-controlled analgesia in patients with lumbar spinal surgery would reduce the side effects seen in monotherapy with opioid analgesia and result in effective pain management. This study was conducted to address this question.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2013
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 27, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 8, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2014
CompletedFebruary 19, 2014
February 1, 2014
1.1 years
February 27, 2013
February 17, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The additional analgesic effect of nefopam on the fentanyl based PCA after lumbar spinal surgery
The resting visual analogue scale (r-VAS) and cough visual analogue scale (c-VAS) were measured.
up to 48 hours post-surgery
Study Arms (1)
The addition of Nefopam
EXPERIMENTALThe addition of Nefopam for intravenous patient-controlled analgesia in patients with lumbar spinal surgery would reduce the side effects seen in monotherapy with opioid analgesia and result in effective pain management.
Interventions
The chief investigator prepared the medications according to the selected randomized table, and investigators who were not involved in medication preparation recorded the pain and prevalence of complications in study subjects. The double-blind restriction was lifted if the patient withdrew from the study, and the next patient was classified into a group while blinded by using the randomized table.Intramuscular midazolam 0.05 mg/kg was administered as a premedication, and then a blood pressure machine, electrocardiogram, and pulse oximeter were connected to the patient in the operating room.
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Severance Hospital
Seoul, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 27, 2013
First Posted
March 8, 2013
Study Start
February 1, 2013
Primary Completion
March 1, 2014
Study Completion
June 1, 2014
Last Updated
February 19, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-02