NCT01807104

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the short term effectiveness and return to function of subjects undergoing primary Total Hip Arthroplasty using an Anterior Approach (incision on the front part of the hip joint) versus Posterior Approach (incision over back part of the hip joint).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
87

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2010

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2010

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 16, 2011

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 8, 2013

Completed
4.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 20, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 20, 2017

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 29, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

August 29, 2019

Status Verified

July 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

7.6 years

First QC Date

June 16, 2011

Results QC Date

May 5, 2019

Last Update Submit

July 25, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Anterior ApproachPosterior Approach

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Returning to Quality of Life by Using Either Anterior Approach Versus Posterior Approach

    Harris Hip 5-Year Total Score Change from Baseline. The Harris Hip score gives a maximum of 100 points. Pain receives 44 points, function 47 points, range of motion 5 points, and deformity 4 points. Function is subdivided into activities of daily living (14 points) and gait (33 points). The higher the Harris Hip score, the less dysfunction.This outcome measure has been validated for joint replacement surgery for peer reviewed orthopedic literature.

    5 years

Study Arms (2)

Anterior Approach Total Hip

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Total hip arthroplasty performed through an anterior surgical approach. Compare results of total hip arthroplasty performed through either an Anterior or Posterior Surgical Approach

Procedure: Anterior Approach / Posterior Approach

Posterior Approach Total Hip

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The additional arm is the posterior approach total hip, which the Anterior Approach is being compared too. Compare results of total hip arthroplasty performed through either an Anterior or Posterior Surgical Approach.

Procedure: Anterior versus Posterior Approach for total hip replacement

Interventions

compare results of total hip arthroplasty performed through either an anterior or posterior surgical approach

Anterior Approach Total Hip

Compare results of total hip arthroplasty performed through either an anterior or posterior surgical approach

Posterior Approach Total Hip

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subject is able to or capable of providing consent to participate in the clinical investigation.
  • Subject is between the ages of 20-75 years, inclusive.
  • Subject requires a cementless, primary total hip arthroplasty for non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease (NIDJD)
  • Subject has sufficient bone stock for the hip replacement device.
  • Subject is a suitable candidate for the devices specified in the clinical investigation plan and is willing to be randomized to either surgical approach.

You may not qualify if:

  • Subject in the opinion of the Investigator has an existing condition that would compromise his /her participation and follow-up in this investigation.
  • Subject has had previous surgery on the affected hip.
  • Subject has significant osteoarthritis of the contra-lateral hip requiring a total hip arthroplasty within 12 months.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Valley Orthopedic Associates

Renton, Washington, 98055, United States

Location

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Hip

Interventions

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OsteoarthritisArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Arthroplasty, ReplacementArthroplastyOrthopedic ProceduresSurgical Procedures, OperativePlastic Surgery ProceduresProsthesis Implantation

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. William P. Barrett, MD
Organization
VOA Research Foundation

Study Officials

  • William P Barrett, MD

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDIV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
William Barrett,M.D,

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 16, 2011

First Posted

March 8, 2013

Study Start

January 1, 2010

Primary Completion

July 20, 2017

Study Completion

July 20, 2017

Last Updated

August 29, 2019

Results First Posted

August 29, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-07

Locations