Cryopreserved Saphenous Vein Allograft in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia for Peripheral Revascularization
LIMBSAVE
Prospective, Multicenter, Primary Below the Knee Bypass Evaluation With CryoVein® Cryopreserved Saphenous Vein Allograft in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia
1 other identifier
observational
30
1 country
7
Brief Summary
The objective Study is to evaluate the short- and long-term clinical outcomes of patients receiving the CryoVein cryopreserved saphenous vein allograft (CVA) as their primary open bypass conduit to assess if there is a quantifiable correlation to time of placement as a primary bypass graft and improved long-term clinical outcomes of patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Feb 2013
Typical duration for all trials
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 22, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 27, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2016
CompletedAugust 19, 2024
August 1, 2024
3.3 years
February 22, 2013
August 15, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Limb Salvage
Patients will undergo follow-up assessment for limb salvage.
Assessed for 24 months following surgery.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Patency
Assessed until graft failure over a period of 24 months. From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 100 months".
Other Outcomes (1)
All cause morbidity and mortality
Assessed for 24 months following implant surgery.
Study Arms (1)
CLI patient's needing open bypass
Patients presenting with Rutherford Class 5 or 6 CLI that are being evaluated for open peripheral arterial revascularization.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients presenting with Rutherford Class 5 or 6 CLI that are being evaluated for open peripheral arterial revascularization.
You may qualify if:
- Patient is an acceptable candidate to receive primary open bypass on the limb receiving the CVA.
- CLI diagnosis of Rutherford Class 5 or 6.
- Tibio-peroneal trunk, Tibial or Peroneal outflow artery.
- Minimum of 1 patent run-off artery.
- Serum Creatinine \< 2.4 mg/dl.
- Life expectancy \> 2 years from consent.
- years of age or older at the time of consent.
- Male or non-pregnant female.
- Ability to understand and provide written informed consent.
- Willing and able to attend and cooperate with the follow-up examinations.
- Able to follow Study required post-operative daily aspirin and/or other oral anticoagulation/antiplatelet regimen.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient currently receiving hemodialysis for end stage renal disease.
- Known hypercoaguable state.
- Known heparin allergy.
- Patients with any condition which, in the opinion of the investigator could preclude evaluation of response or completion of follow-up or affect patient safety.
- Currently being treated with an investigational device or drug (within 3 months prior to surgery).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- CryoLife, Inc.lead
Study Sites (7)
Arizona Heart Institue
Phoenix, Arizona, 85006, United States
Veteran's Administration
Palo Alto, California, 94304, United States
University of California at San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94143-0222, United States
Sacred Heart Hospital
Pensacola, Florida, 32513, United States
Carle Foundation Hospital
Urbana, Illinois, 61801, United States
University of Texas Medical Branch
Galveston, Texas, 77555-0737, United States
Scott & White Memorial Hospital
Temple, Texas, 76508, United States
Related Publications (9)
Walker PJ, Mitchell RS, McFadden PM, James DR, Mehigan JT. Early experience with cryopreserved saphenous vein allografts as a conduit for complex limb-salvage procedures. J Vasc Surg. 1993 Oct;18(4):561-8; discussion 568-9.
PMID: 8411463BACKGROUNDShah RM, Faggioli GL, Mangione S, Harris LM, Kane J, Taheri SA, Ricotta JJ. Early results with cryopreserved saphenous vein allografts for infrainguinal bypass. J Vasc Surg. 1993 Dec;18(6):965-9; discussion 969-71. doi: 10.1067/mva.1993.50617.
PMID: 8264053BACKGROUNDLeseche G, Penna C, Bouttier S, Joubert S, Andreassian B. Femorodistal bypass using cryopreserved venous allografts for limb salvage. Ann Vasc Surg. 1997 May;11(3):230-6. doi: 10.1007/s100169900039.
PMID: 9140596BACKGROUNDMartin RS 3rd, Edwards WH, Mulherin JL Jr, Edwards WH Jr, Jenkins JM, Hoff SJ. Cryopreserved saphenous vein allografts for below-knee lower extremity revascularization. Ann Surg. 1994 Jun;219(6):664-70; discussion 670-2. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199406000-00009.
PMID: 8203975BACKGROUNDFarber A, Major K, Wagner WH, Cohen JL, Cossman DV, Lauterbach SR, Levin PM. Cryopreserved saphenous vein allografts in infrainguinal revascularization: analysis of 240 grafts. J Vasc Surg. 2003 Jul;38(1):15-21. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(03)00330-6.
PMID: 12844083BACKGROUNDBannazadeh M, Sarac TP, Bena J, Srivastava S, Ouriel K, Clair D. Reoperative lower extremity revascularization with cadaver vein for limb salvage. Ann Vasc Surg. 2009 Jan-Feb;23(1):24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2008.04.011. Epub 2008 Jul 26.
PMID: 18657383BACKGROUNDBuckley CJ, Abernathy S, Lee SD, Arko FR, Patterson DE, Manning LG. Suggested treatment protocol for improving patency of femoral-infrapopliteal cryopreserved saphenous vein allografts. J Vasc Surg. 2000 Oct;32(4):731-8. doi: 10.1067/mva.2000.110049.
PMID: 11013037BACKGROUNDZehr BP, Niblick CJ, Downey H, Ladowski JS. Limb salvage with CryoVein cadaver saphenous vein allografts used for peripheral arterial bypass: role of blood compatibility. Ann Vasc Surg. 2011 Feb;25(2):177-81. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2010.07.020.
PMID: 20889296BACKGROUNDRandon C, Jacobs B, De Ryck F, Beele H, Vermassen F. Fifteen years of infrapopliteal arterial reconstructions with cryopreserved venous allografts for limb salvage. J Vasc Surg. 2010 Apr;51(4):869-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.11.062.
PMID: 20347683BACKGROUND
Biospecimen
During the Study follow-up period, a patient may present with an event requiring an open surgical revision, surgical explant or limb amputation on the (allograft) recipient limb. At the time of related planned intervention a tissue sample of the affected area of the allograft may be obtained and, if so, will placed into 10% buffered formalin solution and returned to CryoLife for histologic analysis.
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Scott B Capps, MS
CryoLife, Inc.
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 22, 2013
First Posted
February 27, 2013
Study Start
February 1, 2013
Primary Completion
June 1, 2016
Study Completion
June 1, 2016
Last Updated
August 19, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Post market study of 361 product; not supporting any FDA approvals.