NCT01799707

Brief Summary

Importance: Visual field loss after retinal damage in glaucoma is considered irreversible and methods are needed to achieve vision restoration. Behavioral vision restoration training (VRT), shown to improve visual fields in hemianopia and optic nerve damage, might comprise such a method. Objective: To determine if behaviorally activating areas of residual visual (ARV) using VRT by daily one hour training for 3 months improves detection performance in perimetry compared to a vision discrimination task in the intact visual field sector.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2004

Longer than P75 for phase_2

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2004

Completed
3.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2007

Completed
5.6 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 21, 2013

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 27, 2013

Completed
2 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

July 9, 2019

Status Verified

July 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

3.1 years

First QC Date

February 21, 2013

Last Update Submit

July 7, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

visionrestorationvisual field

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Detection accuracy change in percent over baseline of the visual field

    visual stimulus detection in residual and absolutely defect field of vision will be assessed using computer-based high resolution perimetry (HRP)

    between baseline and 3 months of training

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • change in visual stimulus perimetric detection rate

    between baseline and 3 months of training

  • improvement of reaction time

    between baseline and 3 months of training

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Eye movement control

    between baseline and 3 months of training

Study Arms (2)

vision restoration training

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Vision restoration training (VRT): visual stimuli repetitively presented to stimulate areas of residual vision. The training consists of luminance increment stimuli similar to perimetry and the task isa simple detection task (pressing a key whenever a target stimulus was detected).

Behavioral: vision restoration training

Discrimination training

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Discrimination training. Here, the stimulus is a line segment (bar) which is always presented within the central ±5° visual field in one of four possible random orientations: horizontal, vertical, oblique to the right or oblique to the left. If the patient has visual field defects in this central area, 80% of the stimuli are presented in the intact part of the training region. The task is to identify the orientation of the line segment and press, as fast as possible, one of 4 assigned buttons on the keyboard.

Behavioral: Discrimination Training

Interventions

visual stimuli repetitively presented to stimulate areas of residual vision. The training consists of luminance increment stimuli similar to perimetry and the task isa simple detection task (pressing a key whenever a target stimulus was detected).

Also known as: gVRT
vision restoration training

the stimulus is a line segment (bar) which is always presented within the central ±5° visual field in one of four possible random orientations: horizontal, vertical, oblique to the right or oblique to the left. If the patient has visual field defects in this central area, 80% of the stimuli are presented in the intact part of the training region. The task is to identify the orientation of the line segment and press, as fast as possible, one of 4 assigned buttons on the keyboard.

Discrimination training

Eligibility Criteria

Age25 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Visual filed defect caused by glaucoma
  • Presence of a reproducible and stable visual field defect inside 30° eccentricity in at least one eye in 2 consecutive ophthalmologic visits during the last 12 months before recruitment
  • Well controlled intraocular pressure (IOP), and (iv) age between 25 and 80 years

You may not qualify if:

  • History of any medical condition precluding scheduled study visits or completion of the study (e.g. unstable cardiovascular disease)
  • History of any chronic degenerative or chronic inflammatory disease that could affect the visual field (e.g. multiple sclerosis, tumor
  • History of trauma or any non-glaucoma ocular diseases (e.g. diabetic retinopathy, age-related macular degeneration, macular detachment, vascular occlusion
  • Severe cognitive or motor impairments
  • Insufficient fixation ability
  • Photosensitivity
  • Intraocular surgery or laser treatment performed within the previous 12 months before recruitment; OR
  • Scheduled intraocular surgery

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (1)

  • Sabel BA, Gudlin J. Vision restoration training for glaucoma: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014 Apr 1;132(4):381-9. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.7963.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Glaucoma

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Ocular HypertensionEye Diseases

Study Officials

  • Bernhard A Sabel, PhD

    University of Magdeburg

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Director, Principle Investigator and Study Director

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 21, 2013

First Posted

February 27, 2013

Study Start

July 1, 2004

Primary Completion

August 1, 2007

Study Completion

March 1, 2013

Last Updated

July 9, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-07