NCT01799499

Brief Summary

This study is a prospective randomized open labeled dose ranging comparative study. Twenty four (24) patients with NMIBC who meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be recruited for the study following the initial diagnostic cystoscopy. The investigators believe that this study is of importance on several aspects:

  1. 1.It evaluates a new mode of bladder instillation that may bypass the drawbacks of the current instillation mode.
  2. 2.If proved effective, this mode of treatment might save the need for TURBT performance and serve as a new mode of tumor ablation.
  3. 3.Even if proved partially effective, this mode of treatment will diminish tumors size and/or number, thus enable a more limited TURBT procedure.
  4. 4.This mode of treatment will enable immediate medical attendance to the patient's tumor recurrence without the waiting period (resulting from queues in the medical centers) for TURBT. This might improve the patient's prognostic outcome.
  5. 5.If this experimental treatment will prove to have a better ablative effect in comparison to the standard of care known in the art, this could be translated to a better prophylactic effect of tumor recurrence.
  6. 6.Finding the minimal, yet optimal, effective dose for tumor ablation and tumor recurrence prevention will enable us to reduce adverse effects of higher drug dosage.

Trial Health

30
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2013

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 21, 2013

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 26, 2013

Completed
3 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

September 1, 2015

Status Verified

August 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

Same day

First QC Date

February 21, 2013

Last Update Submit

August 30, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

Non Muscle Invasive Bladder CancerIntravesical instillationMitomycin CHydrogelReverse thermal gelationDrug retentionUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsCarcinomaUrologic NeoplasmsUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsUrinary Bladder DiseasesUrologic DiseasesNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialNeoplasms by Histologic Type MitomycinsMitomycinAntibiotics, AntineoplasticAntineoplastic AgentsTherapeutic UsesPharmacologic ActionsNucleic Acid Synthesis InhibitorsEnzyme InhibitorsMolecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological ActionAlkylating Agents

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Ablative effect of pre-TURBT intravesical instillations with 20,40,80 mg of MMC mixed with 60cc TC-3 Hydrogel on bladder lesion(s) of NMIBC patients

    Cystoscopic and pathological effect (evaluated during TUR-BT visit) of pre-TURBT intravesical instillations with 20,40,80 mg of MMC mixed with 60cc TC-3 Hydrogel on bladder lesion(s) of NMIBC patients.

    2 Years

  • Number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability rate.

    Demonstration of Pre-TURBT TC-3 gel-MMC instillation safety and adverse event rate.Adverse events will be defined as any adverse change in health or side effect that occurs in the clinical trial participant while the patient is receiving the treatment or until the completion of the post-treatment follow-up cystoscopy.

    2 years

Other Outcomes (3)

  • Comparison of the cystoscopic and pathological effect between the 3 groups.

    2 Years

  • one year tumor recurrence rate

    2 Years

  • PK level of MMC-C in blood

    1 Year

Study Arms (3)

Group A: 20 mg MMC mixed with 60cc TC-3

EXPERIMENTAL

Group A: 20 mg MMC mixed with 60cc TC-3 hydrogel. (n=8)

Device: TC-3 hydrogel

• Group B: 40 mg MMC mixed with 60cc TC-3

EXPERIMENTAL

• Group B: 40 mg MMC mixed with 60cc TC-3 hydrogel (n=8)

Device: TC-3 hydrogel

• Group C: 80 mg MMC mixed with 60cc TC-3 hydrogel (n=8)

EXPERIMENTAL

• Group C: 80 mg MMC mixed with 60cc TC-3 hydrogel (n=8)

Device: TC-3 hydrogel

Interventions

Group A: 20 mg MMC mixed with 60cc TC-3

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient is 21 years of age or older.
  • Patient has signed Informed Consent Form and is willing and able to abide by the protocol.
  • Single or multiple tumors (n≤7)
  • Naïve or Recurrent tumor
  • No prior history of HG and/or T1 and/or Tis
  • At least one Tumor ≥ 1mm as evaluated visually by the investigator
  • Largest tumor diameter ≤ 30mm as evaluated visually by the investigator
  • Cystoscopic appearance of papillary Low grade tumor
  • The patient had upper urinary tract evaluation in the previous year excluding urothelial carcinoma, hydronephrosis or Renal Cell Carcinoma or other renal cancers.
  • Good performance status (Karnofsky performance status 70% or greater).
  • No active urinary tract infection as confirmed by urine culture.
  • If the patient is a female of childbearing potential she is using an acceptable/effective method of contraception and has a negative pregnancy test at screening.

You may not qualify if:

  • Carcinoma In Situ (CIS).
  • Over 7 lesions
  • Lesion is larger than 30mm in diameter.
  • "High Grade" urine cytology.
  • Cystoscopic Appearance suspicious for HG and/or solid and/or Tis
  • histologic results of cold cup biopsy are indicative of HG tumor.
  • Tumor located in prostatic urethra.
  • Previous systemic chemotherapy or pelvic radiotherapy.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding patient.
  • Previous treatment with BCG within the last 24 months.
  • The patient did not have at least 3 months cystoscopically confirmed tumor-free interval between the last tumor recurrence and screening.
  • Treatment with intravesical chemotherapy within the 3 last months.
  • The patient has/had any bladder tumor with histology other than TCC
  • Contraindication to MMC.
  • The patient has a history of urinary retention or a PVR≥250cc by bladder scan or ultrasound (PVR test may be repeated up to 3 times).
  • +12 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Western Galilee Hospital Nahariya

Nahariya, Israel

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder NeoplasmsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsCarcinomaUrologic NeoplasmsUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsUrinary Bladder DiseasesUrologic DiseasesNeoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by Histologic TypeFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 21, 2013

First Posted

February 26, 2013

Study Start

March 1, 2013

Primary Completion

March 1, 2013

Study Completion

March 1, 2013

Last Updated

September 1, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-08

Locations