NCT01799304

Brief Summary

Cerebral palsy (CP) concerns 2 children out of 1000 in the general population (SCPE 2002). It is the main cause of postural and motor deficits in children. During the past 20 years, the postural deficits exhibited by these children have been attributed to various factors :

  1. 1.neuromuscular functions
  2. 2.sensory integration
  3. 3.muscular-squeletic functions.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
24

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2013

Typical duration for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2013

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 14, 2013

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 26, 2013

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2015

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

March 23, 2016

Status Verified

March 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

2.1 years

First QC Date

February 14, 2013

Last Update Submit

March 22, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

Locomotioncerebral palsyPostural; Defect

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The main goal of the present project is to investigate the contribution of attentional processes in postural control and locomotion of CP children as compared to control healthy children.

    Mean velocity of center of foot pressure displacements (mm/sec) in static posture under the different experimental conditions

    First day of inclusion T0

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Without attentional distractor and without additional cognitive task (control condition)

    First day of inclusion T0

  • With visual and sound attentional distractors (video film).

    First day of inclusion T0

  • With sound attentional distractor alone (sound track of the video film).

    First day of inclusion T0

  • With an additional cognitive task (adapted Stroop task with animals).

    First day of inclusion T0

Study Arms (4)

no distractor control group

EXPERIMENTAL

postural control and locomotion of CP children without attentional distractor and without additional cognitive task (control condition)

Procedure: no distractor control group

visual and sound attentional distractors

EXPERIMENTAL

postural control and locomotion of CP children with visual and sound attentional distractors (video film).

Procedure: visual and sound attentional distractors

sound attentional distractor alone

EXPERIMENTAL

postural control and locomotion of CP children with sound attentional distractor alone (sound track of the video film).

Procedure: sound attentional distractor alone

additional cognitive task

EXPERIMENTAL

postural control and locomotion of CP children with an additional cognitive task (adapted Stroop task with animals)

Procedure: additional cognitive task

Interventions

This control condition will aim at analyzing posture and locomotion in CP children with the intent to focus attention on their equilibrium, only, without any other interference.

no distractor control group

The distractors will be used to orient subjects' attention toward another simple and motivating task in order to avoid focalisation on postural control and locomotion and to favour a more automatic control.

visual and sound attentional distractors

In addition to the previous condition, the goal of the present condition is to isolate the effects of a sound distractor, since it is known that CP children frequently exhibit visual deficits which may affect their postural and locomotion difficulties.

sound attentional distractor alone

The additional cognitive task aimed to increase the attentional load and to analyse its impact on children's capacity to process two tasks simultaneously (the cognitive and postural or locomotor tasks)

additional cognitive task

Eligibility Criteria

Age7 Years - 12 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • CP children with postural and/or motor deficits due to early cerebral deficits (from conception to 2 years of age according to G. Tardieu) non hereditary and non evolutionary.
  • Aged 7 to 12 years because before 7 years of age the range and speed of postural control exhibit a great variability and after 12, our eligibility criteria are not standardized
  • presenting a clinical CP diplegia or hemiplegia (cf. EMGF),
  • able to stand upright without assistance for at least (real recording time of 30 sec during the experiment) on a force platform (L 50 cm x l 50 cm x h 4,4 cm) and to walk straight ahead on a walking track (518 cm long x 90 cm wide and 0,5 cm thin) without assistance,
  • without severe visual or hearing deficit (\>0,3 for the worse eye without correction or hearing loss \<70db for the worse ear without correction) as indicated in the personal medical report
  • without hyperactivity trouble (Conners' questionnaires non significant \<70), without major attentional deficits (images matching test), without denomination troubles (ELOLA test), able to perform dual tasks (Tea-ch test).

You may not qualify if:

  • parents' or children' informed consent rejected,
  • Participation to another biomedical experiment during this study,
  • Children unable to control upright posture without assistance for at least 45 sec on a force platform (L 50 cm x l 50 cm x h 4.4 cm) or unable to walk without assistance
  • Absence of social security coverage.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Chu Grenoble

Grenoble, 38000, France

Location

Related Publications (34)

  • Agostini, M., Metz-Lutz , M.N., Van Hout, A., Chavance, M., Deloche, G., Pavao- Martins & Dellatolas. 1998. Batterie d'évaluation du langage oral de l'enfant aphasique - ELOLA. Revue de Neuropsychologie, 8, 319-367

    BACKGROUND
  • Albaret, JM., Benesteau, J., & Marquet-Doleac J. 1999. AI Test d'appariement d'images. Éditions ECPA

    BACKGROUND
  • Berger W, Altenmueller E, Dietz V. Normal and impaired development of children's gait. Hum Neurobiol. 1984;3(3):163-70.

    PMID: 6480437BACKGROUND
  • Berger W. Characteristics of locomotor control in children with cerebral palsy. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1998 Jul;22(4):579-82. doi: 10.1016/s0149-7634(97)00047-x.

    PMID: 9595572BACKGROUND
  • Blanchard Y, Carey S, Coffey J, Cohen A, Harris T, Michlik S, Pellecchia GL. The influence of concurrent cognitive tasks on postural sway in children. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2005 Fall;17(3):189-93. doi: 10.1097/01.pep.0000176578.57147.5d.

    PMID: 16357673BACKGROUND
  • Brogren E, Hadders-Algra M, Forssberg H. Postural control in sitting children with cerebral palsy. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1998 Jul;22(4):591-6. doi: 10.1016/s0149-7634(97)00049-3.

    PMID: 9595574BACKGROUND
  • Burtner PA, Qualls C, Woollacott MH. Muscle activation characteristics of stance balance control in children with spastic cerebral palsy. Gait Posture. 1998 Dec 1;8(3):163-174. doi: 10.1016/s0966-6362(98)00032-0.

    PMID: 10200406BACKGROUND
  • Cherng RJ, Su FC, Chen JJ, Kuan TS. Performance of static standing balance in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy under altered sensory environments. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 Jul-Aug;78(4):336-43. doi: 10.1097/00002060-199907000-00008.

    PMID: 10418839BACKGROUND
  • Christ SE, White DA, Brunstrom JE, Abrams RA. Inhibitory control following perinatal brain injury. Neuropsychology. 2003 Jan;17(1):171-8.

    PMID: 12597086BACKGROUND
  • Crenna P, Inverno M, Frigo C, Palmieri R, Fedrizzi E. Pathophysiological profile of gait in children with cerebral palsy. In: Forssberg H, hirschfeld H, editors. Movement disorders in children. Karger: Medicine and Sport Sciences. Basel; 1992. p. 186-98.

    BACKGROUND
  • Crenna P, Inverno M. Objective detection of pathophysiological factors contributing to gait disturbance. In motor development in children, E. Fedrizzi, G. Avanzini and P. Crenna. John Libbey (Eds) London;1994. p. 103-18.

    BACKGROUND
  • Crenna P. Spasticity and 'spastic' gait in children with cerebral palsy. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1998 Jul;22(4):571-8. doi: 10.1016/s0149-7634(97)00046-8.

    PMID: 9595571BACKGROUND
  • Heinen F, Desloovere K, Schroeder AS, Berweck S, Borggraefe I, van Campenhout A, Andersen GL, Aydin R, Becher JG, Bernert G, Caballero IM, Carr L, Valayer EC, Desiato MT, Fairhurst C, Filipetti P, Hassink RI, Hustedt U, Jozwiak M, Kocer SI, Kolanowski E, Krageloh-Mann I, Kutlay S, Maenpaa H, Mall V, McArthur P, Morel E, Papavassiliou A, Pascual-Pascual I, Pedersen SA, Plasschaert FS, van der Ploeg I, Remy-Neris O, Renders A, Di Rosa G, Steinlin M, Tedroff K, Valls JV, Viehweger E, Molenaers G. The updated European Consensus 2009 on the use of Botulinum toxin for children with cerebral palsy. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2010 Jan;14(1):45-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2009.09.005. Epub 2009 Nov 14.

    PMID: 19914110BACKGROUND
  • Holt KG, Ratcliffe R, Jeng SF. Head stability in walking in children with cerebral palsy and in children and adults without neurological impairment. Phys Ther. 1999 Dec;79(12):1153-62.

    PMID: 10630284BACKGROUND
  • Lajoie Y, Teasdale N, Bard C, Fleury M. Attentional demands for static and dynamic equilibrium. Exp Brain Res. 1993;97(1):139-44. doi: 10.1007/BF00228824.

    PMID: 8131825BACKGROUND
  • Laufer Y, Ashkenazi T, Josman N. The effects of a concurrent cognitive task on the postural control of young children with and without developmental coordination disorder. Gait Posture. 2008 Feb;27(2):347-51. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.04.013. Epub 2007 May 29.

    PMID: 17532635BACKGROUND
  • Leonard C. Neural and behavioral changes associated with perinatal damage. In: H.Forssberg and H. Hirschfeld Eds. Movement Disorders in Children. Karger: Medicine and Sport Science Basel; 1992. p. 50-6.

    BACKGROUND
  • Lowes LP, Westcott SL, Palisano RJ, Effgen SK, Orlin MN. Muscle force and range of motion as predictors of standing balance in children with cerebral palsy. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2004;24(1-2):57-77. doi: 10.1300/j006v24n01_03.

    PMID: 15268998BACKGROUND
  • Mainly T., Robertson IH, Anderson V., & Mimmo-Smith I. 2004. Test d'évaluation de l'attention chez l'enfant. Éditions ECPA

    BACKGROUND
  • Molin I, Alricsson M. Physical activity and health among adolescents with cerebral palsy in Sweden. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2009 Oct-Dec;21(4):623-33. doi: 10.1515/ijamh.2009.21.4.623.

    PMID: 20306774BACKGROUND
  • Nashner LM, Shumway-Cook A, Marin O. Stance posture control in select groups of children with cerebral palsy: deficits in sensory organization and muscular coordination. Exp Brain Res. 1983;49(3):393-409. doi: 10.1007/BF00238781.

    PMID: 6641837BACKGROUND
  • Okoshi Y, Itoh M, Takashima S. Characteristic neuropathology and plasticity in periventricular leukomalacia. Pediatr Neurol. 2001 Sep;25(3):221-6. doi: 10.1016/s0887-8994(01)00309-5.

    PMID: 11587877BACKGROUND
  • Olivier I, Cuisinier R, Vaugoyeau M, Nougier V, Assaiante C. Dual-task study of cognitive and postural interference in 7-year-olds and adults. Neuroreport. 2007 May 28;18(8):817-21. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3280e129e1.

    PMID: 17471073BACKGROUND
  • Olivier I, Cuisinier R, Vaugoyeau M, Nougier V, Assaiante C. Age-related differences in cognitive and postural dual-task performance. Gait Posture. 2010 Oct;32(4):494-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.07.008. Epub 2010 Aug 9.

    PMID: 20692161BACKGROUND
  • Olivier I, Palluel E, Nougier V. Effects of attentional focus on postural sway in children and adults. Exp Brain Res. 2008 Feb;185(2):341-5. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1271-6. Epub 2008 Jan 24.

    PMID: 18214449BACKGROUND
  • Palluel E, Nougier V, Olivier I. Postural control and attentional demand during adolescence. Brain Res. 2010 Oct 28;1358:151-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.08.051. Epub 2010 Aug 22.

    PMID: 20735993BACKGROUND
  • Platt MJ, Cans C, Johnson A, Surman G, Topp M, Torrioli MG, Krageloh-Mann I. Trends in cerebral palsy among infants of very low birthweight (<1500 g) or born prematurely (<32 weeks) in 16 European centres: a database study. Lancet. 2007 Jan 6;369(9555):43-50. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60030-0.

    PMID: 17208641BACKGROUND
  • Reilly DS, van Donkelaar P, Saavedra S, Woollacott MH. Interaction between the development of postural control and the executive function of attention. J Mot Behav. 2008 Mar;40(2):90-102. doi: 10.3200/JMBR.40.2.90-102.

    PMID: 18400676BACKGROUND
  • Reilly DS, Woollacott MH, van Donkelaar P, Saavedra S. The interaction between executive attention and postural control in dual-task conditions: children with cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 May;89(5):834-42. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.10.023.

    PMID: 18452729BACKGROUND
  • Seidman LJ, Valera EM, Makris N, Monuteaux MC, Boriel DL, Kelkar K, Kennedy DN, Caviness VS, Bush G, Aleardi M, Faraone SV, Biederman J. Dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex volumetric abnormalities in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder identified by magnetic resonance imaging. Biol Psychiatry. 2006 Nov 15;60(10):1071-80. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.04.031. Epub 2006 Jul 28.

    PMID: 16876137BACKGROUND
  • Prevalence and characteristics of children with cerebral palsy in Europe. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2002 Sep;44(9):633-40.

    PMID: 12227618BACKGROUND
  • Woollacott MH, Burtner P. Neural and musculoskeletal contributions to the development of stance balance control in typical children and in children with cerebral palsy. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 1996 Oct;416:58-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1996.tb14279.x.

    PMID: 8997450BACKGROUND
  • Woollacott MH, Burtner P, Jensen J, Jasiewicz J, Roncesvalles N, Sveistrup H. Development of postural responses during standing in healthy children and children with spastic diplegia. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1998 Jul;22(4):583-9. doi: 10.1016/s0149-7634(97)00048-1.

    PMID: 9595573BACKGROUND
  • Woollacott MH, Crenna P. Postural control in standing and walking in children with cerebral palsy. Chapter. In: Hadders-Algra M, Brogren Carlberg E, editors. Posture: a key issue in developmental disorders. London: Mac Keith Press; 2008.

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cerebral PalsyHemiplegia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Brain Damage, ChronicBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesParalysisNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Marie-Christine COMMARE, MD

    Unité de MPR Pédiatrique, CHU GRENOBLE

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Vincent NOUGIER, Pr

    Laboratoire TIMC-IMAG, Faculté de Médecine

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Dominic PÉRENNOU, Pr

    Clinique MPR- Institut de Rééducation- Hôpital sud, CHU Grenoble

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Isabelle OLIVIER, Pr

    Laboratoire TIMC-IMAG, Faculté de Médecine

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • BARBIERI GUILLAUME

    Laboratoire TIMC-IMAG, Faculté de Médecine

    STUDY CHAIR
  • FARIGOULE VINCENT, MD

    University Hospital, Grenoble

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • PRADO CHLOE, MD

    University Hospital, Grenoble

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 14, 2013

First Posted

February 26, 2013

Study Start

February 1, 2013

Primary Completion

March 1, 2015

Study Completion

December 1, 2015

Last Updated

March 23, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-03

Locations