Effect of a Decision Aid on Decision Making for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
2 other identifiers
interventional
126
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pelvic organ prolapse is a common condition that affects millions of women every year. There are many options for treatment and it can be difficult to make a decision as how best to proceed. Previous studies have shown that decisional aids (DAs) may improve knowledge, physician-patient communication, decisional conflict, and patient satisfaction. However, no study has evaluated the role of a decisional aid among women presenting for evaluation and management of prolapse. We would like to determine if a decision aid for prolapse decreases the amount of decisional conflict women face when choosing a plan of care. We hypothesize that there will be a difference in the level/amount of decisional conflict between women who receive a DA and those who do not. Specifically, we anticipate that women randomized to receiving standard counseling and a DA with have less decisional conflict than the cohort receiving standard counseling alone.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 20, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 25, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2013
CompletedAugust 28, 2013
August 1, 2013
10 months
February 20, 2013
August 27, 2013
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Difference in decisional conflict
The primary outcome for this analysis is decisional conflict differences in those who receive a DA and those who do not. The investigators will administer the 16-item traditional Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS). The DCS comprises 3 subscales: decision uncertainty, factors contributing to uncertainty, and perceived effective decision making. The investigators will use the statement format of this scale in which patients respond to a series of Likert-scale statements using response categories of strongly agree, agree, neither agree nor disagree, disagree, or strongly disagree, which are scored as 0-4, respectively, and added. Based on previous research, scores will be tabulated and patients will be grouped as either having "high level of decisional conflict" versus "low level of decisional conflict." Values will be assessed for normality and compared between groups (i.e. those receiving the DA versus those who did not).
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Number of patients who choose surgery over conservative management
1 year
Study Arms (2)
Standard counseling
NO INTERVENTIONStandard counseling, pelvic organ prolapse decision aid
EXPERIMENTALIn addition to standard counseling at the time of the initial new patient visit, the patients randomized to the experimental arm will recieve a pelvic organ prolapse decision aid prior to their initial visit.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female
- ≥18 years old
- Scheduled for consultation visit for pelvic organ prolapse of any type (cystocele, rectocele, enterocele, uterine prolapse, and/or uterovaginal prolapse)
You may not qualify if:
- \<18 years old
- Non-English speaking
- Any patient who declines, or expresses unwillingness to being contacted for participation in the study
- Planned concomitant non-gynecologic procedure
- Established patient in the practice
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hartford Hospital
Hartford, Connecticut, 06106, United States
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hema Brazell
Hartford Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 20, 2013
First Posted
February 25, 2013
Study Start
December 1, 2012
Primary Completion
October 1, 2013
Last Updated
August 28, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-08