Prospective Randomized Controlled Treatment Trial for Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy
PLACE
A Prospective Randomized Controlled Multicentre Trial Comparing Half-dose Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) With High-density Subthreshold Micropulse Laser Treatment in Patients With Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy (CSC)
1 other identifier
interventional
140
4 countries
5
Brief Summary
Chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) is a relatively frequent eye disease that often occurs in patients in the professionally active age range. In this disease, there is pooling of fluid under the central retina (the macula). This specific form of macular degeneration can cause permanent vision loss, image distortion, loss of color and contrast vision due to this fluid under the retina. An early diagnosis and treatment may improve the visual outcome and quality of life. To date there is no international consensus on the optimal treatment of chronic CSC. Many retrospective studies suggest that treatment with photodynamic therapy (PDT) is effective in chronic CSC. Micropulse laser (ML) therapy may also be effective in this disease. The proposed study is the first prospective randomized controlled trial in chronic CSC. In this study, participants with chronic CSC will be randomized into two treatment groups, PDT or ML treatment. The trial is a superiority study, because retrospective studies suggest that PDT treatment may be more effective than ML treatment. Therefore, PDT treatment is challenged against ML treatment. The null hypothesis of the study is that PDT treatment is more effective than ML treatment in patients with active chronic CSC. The alternative hypothesis is that PDT treatment is not more effective than ML treatment in these patients. Treatment success will not only be based on anatomical improvement, but also on functional endpoints, which are most important from a patient's perspective. The study will take place in five large tertiary referral university hospitals in Europe that have extensive experience with conducting clinical trials (in Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Cologne, Germany; Leiden, the Netherlands; Oxford, United Kingdom; and Paris, France). Each of these centers has confirmed sufficient funding to conduct the research. The study will last max. 8 months per participant. Each participant will come for 5 (in the case of 1 treatment) or 7 visits (in the case of 2 treatments). Study evaluations will be mostly part of regular clinical care. The whole study will last for max. 24 months.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Dec 2013
Longer than P75 for phase_4
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 21, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 25, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2017
CompletedOctober 10, 2017
April 1, 2016
3.4 years
February 21, 2013
October 9, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Absence of subretinal fluid on OCT scan
The primary endpoint of this study is to assess if there is a difference between the efficacy of half-dose photodynamic therapy treatment versus micropulse laser treatment in patients with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. The assessment of this efficacy will be based on the anatomical effect on optical coherence tomography (OCT): absence of subretinal fluid versus persistent subretinal fluid, 6-8 weeks after treatment. After all, the absence or presence of fluid under the retina on the OCT scan is a direct reflection of the activity of the disease in these patients.
6-8 weeks after treatment
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Best-corrected visual acuity
6-8 weeks and 7-8 months after Treatment Visit 1
Other Outcomes (3)
Macular sensitivity on microperimetry
6-8 weeks and 7-8 months after Treatment Visit 1
Vision-related quality of life as reported on the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ-25)
6-8 weeks and 7-8 months after Treatment Visit 1
Number of second treatments
7-8 months after Treatment Visit 1
Study Arms (2)
Half-dose photodynamic therapy (PDT)
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn the PDT treatment arm, all patients will receive an intravenous drip through which half-dose (3 mg/m2) verteporfin (Visudyne ®) is administered, with an infusion time of 10 minutes. At 15 minutes after the start of the infusion, PDT laser treatment is performed with standard 50 J/cm2 fluency, a wavelength of 689 nm, and a treatment duration of 83 seconds. If there still is subretinal fluid on OCT scan at Evaluation Visit 1 (6-8 weeks after Treatment Visit 1 / the first treatment with half-dose PDT), a second treatment with half-dose PDT will be performed (Treatment Visit 2).
Micropulse laser (ML) treatment
ACTIVE COMPARATORML treatment with an 810 nm diode laser will be performed of the areas identified on mid-phase ICG angiography. Multiple laser spots will be applied, covering the leakage area on mid-phase ICG angiography. The area(s) that has to be treated is determined based on those hyperfluorescent area(s) on mid-phase (approximately 10 minutes) ICG-angiography that correspond to subretinal fluid accumulation in the macula on the OCT scan and hyperfluorescent "hot spots" on the mid-phase (3 minutes) fluorescein angiogram. If there still is subretinal fluid on OCT scan at Evaluation Visit 1 (6-8 weeks after Treatment Visit 1 / the first ML treatment), a second ML treatment will be performed (Treatment Visit 2).
Interventions
At exactly 15 minutes after the start of the half-dose verteporfin infusion, the PDT treatment will take place. The area that has to be treated with the PDT laser is determined based on those hyperfluorescent area(s) on mid-phase (approximately 10 minutes) ICG-angiography that correspond to subretinal fluid accumulation in the macula on the OCT scan and hyperfluorescent "hot spots" on the mid-phase (approximately 3 minutes) fluorescein angiogram. The spot size will be defined based on diameter of the hyperfluorescent area on ICG angiography plus 1mm. The treatment is performed with standard fluency (50 J/cm2), a PDT laser wavelength of 689 nm, and a standard treatment duration of 83 seconds.
The following ML treatment settings will be used: a power of 1800 mW\*, a duty cycle of 5%, frequency of 500 Hz, exposure time of 0.2 s per spot, spot size: 125 µm, minimal distance of spot from fovea: 500 µm. \* Subthreshold treatment is desired, meaning that no visible reaction due to laser treatment has to be seen in the retina. In virtually all patients, a power of 1800 mW wil not produce a visible discoloration of the retina after application of a laser spot with the aforementioned settings. If retinal discoloration is seen at a power of 1800 mW the power will be reduced with steps of 300 mW until there is no visible reaction. The first laser "test" spot will always be applied just outside the macular area.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- male and female patients ≥ 18 years of age who are able to give written informed consent
- active chronic central serous chorioretinopathy
- subjective visual loss \> 6 weeks, interpreted as onset of active disease
- subretinal fluid that includes the fovea on OCT scanning at Baseline Examination.
- Please NOTE: Subretinal fluid does not have to include fovea on OCT to be eligible for treatment at Control Visit 1, as long as there is persistent subretinal fluid in the macula, which is interpreted as persistently active disease (see 5.7 "Retreatment criteria and considerations").
- hyperfluorescent areas on ICG angiography
- ≥1 ill-defined hyperfluorescent leakage areas on fluorescein angiography with retinal pigment epithelial window defect(s) that are compatible with chronic CSC
You may not qualify if:
- The participant may not enter the study if ANY of the following apply:
- any previous treatments for active CSC in the study eye
- current treatment with corticosteroids (topical or systemic), or anticipated start of corticosteroid treatment within the first 7-8 months from the start of the trial period
- evidence of other diagnosis that can explain serous subretinal fluid or visual loss
- BCVA \< 20/200 (Snellen equivalent)
- profound chorioretinal atrophy in central macular area on ophthalmoscopy and OCT
- myopia \> 6 dioptres
- visual loss and/or serous detachment on OCT \< 6 weeks
- continuous and/or progressive visual loss \> 18 months or serous detachment on OCT \> 18 months
- no hyperfluorescence on ICG angiography
- intraretinal edema on OCT
- (relative) contraindications for PDT treatment (pregnancy, porphyria, severely disturbed liver function). Pregnancy will not be routinely tested in female patients, but the possibility of pregnancy will be discussed during eligibility screening
- (relative) contraindications for fluorescein angiography or ICG angiography (known allergies especially against shellfish, previous reactions)
- Soft drusen in treated eye or fellow eye, signs of choroidal neovascularization on ophthalmoscopy and/or fluorescein angiography/indocyanine green angiography
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Radboud University Medical Centerlead
- University of Colognecollaborator
- University of Oxfordcollaborator
- Leiden University Medical Centercollaborator
- University Hospital, Pariscollaborator
Study Sites (5)
Creteil University Eye Clinic
Paris, 94010, France
Cologne University Eye Clinic
Cologne, 50937, Germany
Leiden University Medical Center
Leiden, Netherlands
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Institute of Ophthalmology
Nijmegen, 6500 HB, Netherlands
Oxford University Eye Hospital, John Radcliffe Hospital
Oxford, OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
Related Publications (6)
Feenstra HMA, Hahn LC, van Rijssen TJ, Tsonaka R, Breukink MB, Keunen JEE, Peters PJH, Dijkman G, Souied EH, MacLaren RE, Querques G, Downes SM, Fauser S, Hoyng CB, van Dijk EHC, Boon CJF. EFFICACY OF HALF-DOSE PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY VERSUS HIGH-DENSITY SUBTHRESHOLD MICROPULSE LASER FOR TREATING PIGMENT EPITHELIAL DETACHMENTS IN CHRONIC CENTRAL SEROUS CHORIORETINOPATHY. Retina. 2022 Apr 1;42(4):721-729. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003363.
PMID: 34864802DERIVEDPfau M, van Dijk EHC, van Rijssen TJ, Schmitz-Valckenberg S, Holz FG, Fleckenstein M, Boon CJF. Estimation of current and post-treatment retinal function in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy using artificial intelligence. Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 14;11(1):20446. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99977-4.
PMID: 34650220DERIVEDvan Rijssen TJ, Hahn LC, van Dijk EHC, Tsonaka R, Scholz P, Breukink MB, Blanco-Garavito R, Souied EH, Keunen JEE, MacLaren RE, Querques G, Fauser S, Downes SM, Hoyng CB, Boon CJF. RESPONSE OF CHOROIDAL ABNORMALITIES TO PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY VERSUS MICROPULSE LASER IN CHRONIC CENTRAL SEROUS CHORIORETINOPATHY: Place Trial Report No. 4. Retina. 2021 Oct 1;41(10):2122-2131. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003157.
PMID: 34543244DERIVEDvan Dijk EHC, Fauser S, Breukink MB, Blanco-Garavito R, Groenewoud JMM, Keunen JEE, Peters PJH, Dijkman G, Souied EH, MacLaren RE, Querques G, Downes SM, Hoyng CB, Boon CJF. Half-Dose Photodynamic Therapy versus High-Density Subthreshold Micropulse Laser Treatment in Patients with Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: The PLACE Trial. Ophthalmology. 2018 Oct;125(10):1547-1555. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.04.021. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
PMID: 29776672DERIVEDBreukink MB, Mohr JK, Ossewaarde-van Norel A, den Hollander AI, Keunen JE, Hoyng CB, Boon CJ. Half-dose photodynamic therapy followed by diode micropulse laser therapy as treatment for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: evaluation of a prospective treatment protocol. Acta Ophthalmol. 2016 Mar;94(2):187-97. doi: 10.1111/aos.12938. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
PMID: 26670630DERIVEDBreukink MB, Downes SM, Querques G, van Dijk EHC, den Hollander AI, Blanco-Garavito R, Keunen JEE, Souied EH, MacLaren RE, Hoyng CB, Fauser S, Boon CJF. Comparing half-dose photodynamic therapy with high-density subthreshold micropulse laser treatment in patients with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (the PLACE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015 Sep 21;16:419. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0939-z.
PMID: 26390920DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Camiel JF Boon, MD PhD FEBO
Leiden University Medical Center & Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Carel B Hoyng, MD PhD
Radboud University Medical Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sacha Fauser, MD PhD
Cologne University Eye Clinic
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Giuseppe Querques, MD PhD
Creteil University Eye Clinic, Paris
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Susan M Downes, MD FRCOphth
Oxford Eye Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Robert E MacLaren, PhD FRCO
University of Oxford
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 21, 2013
First Posted
February 25, 2013
Study Start
December 1, 2013
Primary Completion
May 1, 2017
Study Completion
May 1, 2017
Last Updated
October 10, 2017
Record last verified: 2016-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share