Study Stopped
No site recruitment due to Covid-19
Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of PEER Interactive Versus Treatment as Usual in Subjects With a Primary Diagnosis of Depression
A Prospective, Double Blind, Randomized, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Utility, Safety, and Efficacy of Using PEER Interactive to Inform the Prescription of Medications to Patients With a Primary Diagnosis of a Depressive Disorder Versus Treatment as Usual.
1 other identifier
interventional
1,922
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled study to evaluate the effectiveness of PEER Interactive to inform treatment in subjects with a primary diagnosis of depression with comorbidity of non-psychotic behavioral disorders versus treatment as usual, as determined by the investigator. The primary measurement for improvement of the subjects depression will be a self-evaluation questionnaire, Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report 16, but the investigators will also collect information on their clinical global improvement and any reduction in adverse events.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 14, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 20, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2022
CompletedJuly 31, 2020
July 1, 2020
8.8 years
February 14, 2013
July 29, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self Reported 16 (QIDS-SR16)
A 16 question self administer survey on the status of the subject's depression. The measurement will be taken until the completion of the study (6 months)or until the subject achieves maximum medical improvement.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Clinical Global Impression (CGI)
6 months
Concise Health Risk Tracking (CHRT-7SR)
6 months
Post traumatic stress disorder checklist - civilian
6 months
Maximum Medical Improvement (MMI)
6 months
Other Outcomes (1)
Number of Subjects with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
6 months
Study Arms (2)
Informed by PEER Interactive Report
EXPERIMENTALThe PEER Interactive Report -This study is prospective in nature. For subjects in the experimental group, the treating physician will follow the guidance of the subject's PEER Interactive Report as regards sensitivity to on-label medications and classes of medication. The subjects will be washed out of all current medications prior to having an EEG, which is necessary to generate the PEER Interactive Report. The wash out period for outpatients is no longer than 14 days. The subjects will be followed for 6 months after the initial treatment, or until the patient has achieved maximum medical improvement (MMI). The patient will be seen on a routine basis and assessments will be made at each interaction to evaluate the patient's improvement in mental health.
No Report
NO INTERVENTIONThis study is prospective in nature. Subjects in the control group will be treated according to treatment as usual and best judgment of the treating physician. PEER Interactive Report is not provided to the investigator. The subjects will be followed for 6 months after the initial treatment, or until the patient has achieved maximum medical improvement (MMI). The patient will be seen on a routine basis and assessments will be made at each interaction to evaluate the patient's improvement in mental health.
Interventions
The PEER Interactive Report provides information comparing the subject's Quantitative Electroencephalography (QEEG) to a database of outcomes from patients with similar QEEG results, and how they responded to on-label treatments. This report provides a probability of how this subject will respond to treatment based upon a comparison of similar subjects in the database.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Must speak and read English
- Must be able to provide written informed consent
- A primary diagnosis of a DSM-IV depressive disorder
- Co-morbidities of non-psychotic behavioral disorders, including PTSD and mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) are eligible to participate.
- Able to stop all medications (wash out) for 5 half-lves of all medication(s) which affect the EEG. Outpatient subjects are eligible if they can be washed out of their medications in 14 days or less.
- Ability to comply with the requirements of the study
You may not qualify if:
- Diagnosis of a psychotic disorder
- History of, or current, open head trauma
- Subjects who would not be good candidates to be washed out of their medications, in the opinion of the investigator.
- History of craniotomy, cerebral metastases, cerebrovascular accident, current diagnosis of seizure disorder, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, schizo-affective disorder, dementia, mental retardation, or major depression with psychotic features, or use of depot neuroleptics in the last 12 months.
- Clinically significant medical illness, including thyroid disorders.
- Know pregnancy and/or lactation, or intent to become pregnant during the study.
- Chronic or acute pain requiring prescription medication(s).
- Candidates with any metal, shrapnel or other similar objects in the head that could affect the QEEG
- Candidates that are currently stable and considered to be at maximum medical improvement on current medications.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- MYnd Analyticslead
Study Sites (2)
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
Bethesda, Maryland, 20889, United States
Fort Belvoir Community Hospital
Fort Belvoir, Virginia, 22060, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Daniel Iosifescu, MD, PhD
Langone Center, NYU
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Michael Metzig, BA
MYnd Analytics, Inc.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The subject is masked as to assignment to Control or Treatment Group. The blinded subject acts as the blinded rater in providing the primary outcome measure of the QIDS-SR16
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 14, 2013
First Posted
February 20, 2013
Study Start
March 1, 2013
Primary Completion
December 31, 2021
Study Completion
June 30, 2022
Last Updated
July 31, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
We do not plan to share individual participant data with other researchers.