Registry Trial to Determine pCLE Image Interpretation Criteria and Preliminary Accuracy in the Lung
BREATH
1 other identifier
observational
99
1 country
9
Brief Summary
Patients will be enrolled that are undergoing bronchoscopy for diagnosis of discrete lung lesions or for detection of acute rejection following lung transplants. The hypothesis is that bronchoscopy together with probe-based endomicroscopy (pCLE)results in improved and/or incremental diagnostic yield (definitive diagnosis) over conventional bronchoscopy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Feb 2013
Longer than P75 for all trials
9 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 14, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 15, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 24, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 24, 2016
CompletedAugust 29, 2017
August 1, 2017
3.9 years
February 14, 2013
August 28, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Development of criteria for the characterization of discrete lung lesions and for characterization of acute lung rejection in lung transplant.
For Group 1 - Discrete lung lesions
Up to 12 months
Diagnostic performance of the pCLE image interpretation criteria for discrete lung lesions and for acute lung rejection in lung transplant.
For Group 2 - Transplant rejection
Up to 12 months.
Study Arms (2)
pCLE for Discrete lung lesions
Patients undergoing bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of a lesion with probe based laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) imaging before biopsy
pCLE for acute lung transplant rejection
Patients undergoing bronchoscopy for the detection of acute rejection of lung transplant with probe based laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) imaging before biopsy
Interventions
pCLE will be added to standard bronchoscopy for the purpose of characterizing lung cancer or for characterizing of acute rejection in transplanted lungs.
Eligibility Criteria
Subjects who are 18 years of age or older with a clinical indication for a Bronchoscopic procedure for: * Discrete Lung Lesions * Surveillance or Symptoms of Acute Rejection in Lung Transplants
You may qualify if:
- Male or female \> 18 years of age
- Willing and able to comply with study procedures and provide written informed consent to participate in the study
- Indeterminate discrete nodule(s) suspicious for cancer scheduled for diagnostic bronchoscopy
- Newly discovered \&/or prior discovered non classified nodules, hard to define based on CT scan
- Purpose of bronchoscopy is for diagnosis of lesion(s) - can be solitary pulmonary nodule or multiple lesions
- All lesion locations are acceptable
- Any patient undergoing clinically indicated bronchoscopies after lung transplantation
- Patients post transplant showing clinical signs of acute rejection \>3 weeks; \< 1 year
- Patient with single or double lung transplant
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindication to short-acting anesthetic agents;
- Contraindications to transbronchial biopsy
- Bleeding diathesis;
- A pacemaker/defibrillator;
- A diagnosis by other means (sputum cytology, microbiology).
- Unwilling To Consent
- Unable To Safely Tolerate A Bronchoscopic Procedure
- Unwilling To Comply With Surveillance Bronchoscopy Follow Up
- Chronic Rejection
- Fungal Disease
- Ax Histological Assessment Or Incomplete Biopsy Procedure Should Be Considered As A Screen Failure
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (9)
St. Joseph's Medical Center
Phoenix, Arizona, 85013, United States
Mayo Clinic
Jacksonville, Florida, 32082, United States
University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60637, United States
Columbus Regional Hospital
Columbus, Indiana, 47201, United States
University of Louisiana Shreveport
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71130, United States
Walter Reed Military Medical Center
Bethesda, Maryland, 20889, United States
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
University of Rochester
Rochester, New York, 14642, United States
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43201, United States
Related Publications (19)
Meining A, Chen YK, Pleskow D, Stevens P, Shah RJ, Chuttani R, Michalek J, Slivka A. Direct visualization of indeterminate pancreaticobiliary strictures with probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy: a multicenter experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Nov;74(5):961-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.05.009. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
PMID: 21802675BACKGROUNDSharma P, Meining AR, Coron E, Lightdale CJ, Wolfsen HC, Bansal A, Bajbouj M, Galmiche JP, Abrams JA, Rastogi A, Gupta N, Michalek JE, Lauwers GY, Wallace MB. Real-time increased detection of neoplastic tissue in Barrett's esophagus with probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy: final results of an international multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Sep;74(3):465-72. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.04.004. Epub 2011 Jul 13.
PMID: 21741642BACKGROUNDPohl H, Rosch T, Vieth M, Koch M, Becker V, Anders M, Khalifa AC, Meining A. Miniprobe confocal laser microscopy for the detection of invisible neoplasia in patients with Barrett's oesophagus. Gut. 2008 Dec;57(12):1648-53. doi: 10.1136/gut.2008.157461. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
PMID: 18755886BACKGROUNDNewton RC, Kemp SV, Yang GZ, Elson DS, Darzi A, Shah PL. Imaging parenchymal lung diseases with confocal endomicroscopy. Respir Med. 2012 Jan;106(1):127-37. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2011.09.009. Epub 2011 Oct 14.
PMID: 22000588BACKGROUNDYick CY, von der Thusen JH, Bel EH, Sterk PJ, Kunst PW. In vivo imaging of the airway wall in asthma: fibered confocal fluorescence microscopy in relation to histology and lung function. Respir Res. 2011 Jun 23;12(1):85. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-12-85.
PMID: 21699692BACKGROUNDThiberville L, Salaun M, Lachkar S, Dominique S, Moreno-Swirc S, Vever-Bizet C, Bourg-Heckly G. Human in vivo fluorescence microimaging of the alveolar ducts and sacs during bronchoscopy. Eur Respir J. 2009 May;33(5):974-85. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00083708. Epub 2009 Feb 12.
PMID: 19213792BACKGROUNDHenschke CI, Naidich DP, Yankelevitz DF, McGuinness G, McCauley DI, Smith JP, Libby D, Pasmantier M, Vazquez M, Koizumi J, Flieder D, Altorki N, Miettinen OS. Early lung cancer action project: initial findings on repeat screenings. Cancer. 2001 Jul 1;92(1):153-9. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010701)92:13.0.co;2-s.
PMID: 11443621BACKGROUNDNational Lung Screening Trial Research Team; Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, Black WC, Clapp JD, Fagerstrom RM, Gareen IF, Gatsonis C, Marcus PM, Sicks JD. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011 Aug 4;365(5):395-409. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1102873. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
PMID: 21714641BACKGROUNDIkeda N, Hayashi A, Iwasaki K, Honda H, Tsuboi M, Usuda J, Kato H. Comprehensive diagnostic bronchoscopy of central type early stage lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2007 Jun;56(3):295-302. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.01.009. Epub 2007 Feb 8.
PMID: 17291623BACKGROUNDWang Memoli JS, Nietert PJ, Silvestri GA. Meta-analysis of guided bronchoscopy for the evaluation of the pulmonary nodule. Chest. 2012 Aug;142(2):385-393. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-1764.
PMID: 21980059BACKGROUNDGildea TR, Mazzone PJ, Karnak D, Meziane M, Mehta AC. Electromagnetic navigation diagnostic bronchoscopy: a prospective study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006 Nov 1;174(9):982-9. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200603-344OC. Epub 2006 Jul 27.
PMID: 16873767BACKGROUNDWilson DS, Bartlett RJ. Improved Diagnostic Yield of Bronchoscopy in a Community Practice: Combination of Electromagnetic Navigation System and Rapid On-site Evaluation. Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology 2007;14:227-232 10.1097/LBR.0b013e31815a7b00.
BACKGROUNDOhtani K, Lee AM, Lam S. Frontiers in bronchoscopic imaging. Respirology. 2012 Feb;17(2):261-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2011.02108.x.
PMID: 22126413BACKGROUNDSalaun M, Bourg-Heckly G, Thiberville L. [Confocal endomicroscopy of the lung: from the bronchus to the alveolus]. Rev Mal Respir. 2010 Jun;27(6):579-88. doi: 10.1016/j.rmr.2009.12.009. Epub 2010 Jun 2. French.
PMID: 20610073BACKGROUNDThiberville L, Salaun M. Bronchoscopic advances: on the way to the cells. Respiration. 2010;79(6):441-9. doi: 10.1159/000313495. Epub 2010 May 12.
PMID: 20431326BACKGROUNDFilner JJ, Bonura EJ, Lau ST, Abounasr KK, Naidich D, Morice RC, Eapen GA, Jimenez CA, Casal RF, Ost D. Bronchoscopic fibered confocal fluorescence microscopy image characteristics and pathologic correlations. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2011 Jan;18(1):23-30. doi: 10.1097/LBR.0b013e318203da1c.
PMID: 23169014BACKGROUNDDeVito Dabbs A, Hoffman LA, Iacono AT, Wells CL, Grgurich W, Zullo TG, McCurry KR, Dauber JH. Pattern and predictors of early rejection after lung transplantation. Am J Crit Care. 2003 Nov;12(6):497-507.
PMID: 14619355BACKGROUNDGotway MB, Dawn SK, Sellami D, Golden JA, Reddy GP, Keith FM, Webb WR. Acute rejection following lung transplantation: limitations in accuracy of thin-section CT for diagnosis. Radiology. 2001 Oct;221(1):207-12. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2211010380.
PMID: 11568342BACKGROUNDMacMahon H, Austin JH, Gamsu G, Herold CJ, Jett JR, Naidich DP, Patz EF Jr, Swensen SJ; Fleischner Society. Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology. 2005 Nov;237(2):395-400. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2372041887.
PMID: 16244247BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Cesar Keller, MD
Mayo Clinic
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kyle Hogarth, MD
University of Chicago
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Doug Arenberg, MD
University of Michigan
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Adam Wellikoff, MD
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 14, 2013
First Posted
February 15, 2013
Study Start
February 1, 2013
Primary Completion
December 24, 2016
Study Completion
December 24, 2016
Last Updated
August 29, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-08