NCT01790451

Brief Summary

Up to 16 patients with confirmed low- or intermediate risk prostate cancer scheduled for a radical prostatectomy will be asked to have the Irreversible Electroporation (IRE) procedure approximately 30 days prior to the prostatectomy. Ablation with IRE will be performed using similar planning criteria, procedure protocol, instruments and software used for brachytherapy, a conventional targeted radiation therapy where radioactive seeds are implanted into prostate tumours. Patients will have an ultrasound of the prostate and the imaging data will be entered into the Planning Software system. The volume of the prostate is measured and a specified ablation zone will be determined. The IRE will be performed under general anaesthetic and the specified zone identified in the planning stage will be ablated. Four IRE electrode needles will be placed into the prostate under ultrasound image guidance. When the needles are in place, electric pulses of one to two minutes duration are used to ablate the specified zone. The total procedure time will be approximately 1 hour. Safety data will be collected and patients will be followed up at 1 week, 2 weeks post IRE, pre- prostatectomy, post prostatectomy and 1 week post prostatectomy. The safety data collection is at 2 weeks post IRE. Before the IRE procedure, patients will have a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) of the prostate. The patients will have their scheduled prostatectomy at approximately 30 days after the IRE procedure. Pre-prostatectomy, the ablation zone will be radiologically assessed by a control MRI/CEUS. Post prostatectomy, efficacy of ablation will be determined by histological examination of the prostate by the Pathology Department and measured as complete or incomplete ablation. The primary outcome is safety as measured by the composite of procedural device and post procedural adverse events, measured with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 4 (CTCAE), Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) score, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) or required catheterization time and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and efficacy of ablation determined by histological examination post prostatectomy. Secondary outcomes will be patients procedure satisfaction measured by patient satisfaction questionnaire, post procedural pain management and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score, time to ambulation, length of hospital stay.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
16

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_1 prostate-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2013

Shorter than P25 for phase_1 prostate-cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 8, 2013

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 13, 2013

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2013

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

February 20, 2015

Status Verified

August 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

February 8, 2013

Last Update Submit

February 19, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

focal therapyirreversible electroporationprostate cancer

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Safety IRE ablation procedure

    To determine if the IRE ablation procedure is safe as measured by the composite number of procedural, device and post procedural adverse events measured with the CTCAE proforma.

    1 year

  • Efficacy

    To determine if complete ablation of the specified targeted ablation zone is achieved as measured by histopathology assessment.

    1 year

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Side effects

    1 year

  • Quality of Life

    1 year

  • Ablation Zone Detection

    1 year

Study Arms (2)

peripheral ablation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

an ablation of the peripheral area of the prostate

Procedure: Irreversible Electroporation

More central ablation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

an ablation, more centrally, in proximity of the urethra

Procedure: Irreversible Electroporation

Interventions

Also known as: Nanoknife
More central ablationperipheral ablation

Eligibility Criteria

Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with prostate cancer who are indicated to undergo a radical prostatectomy
  • Life expectancy of \> 10 years
  • Able to visualize prostate gland adequately on transrectal US imaging during enrolment evaluation
  • No prostate calcification greater than 5 mm
  • Ability of subject to stop anticoagulant and anti-platelet therapy for 7 days prior and 7 days post procedure

You may not qualify if:

  • Other Conditions/Status
  • Bleeding disorder as determined by prothrombin time (PT) \> 14.5 seconds, partial thromboplastin time (PTT) \> 34 seconds, and Platelet Count \< 140/microliter (uL)
  • Active urinary tract infection (UTI)
  • History of bladder neck contracture
  • Anaesthesia Surgical Assignment, category IV or greater
  • History of inflammatory bowel disease
  • Concurrent major debilitating illness
  • Prior or concurrent malignancy
  • Cardiac History
  • Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) / Pacemaker
  • Prior or current therapies
  • Biologic therapy for prostate cancer
  • Chemotherapy for prostate cancer
  • Hormonal therapy for prostate cancer within 3 months of procedure
  • Radiotherapy for prostate cancer
  • +3 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

AMC University Hospital

Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, Netherlands

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • van den Bos W, de Bruin DM, Jurhill RR, Savci-Heijink CD, Muller BG, Varkarakis IM, Skolarikos A, Zondervan PJ, Laguna-Pes MP, Wijkstra H, de Reijke TM, de la Rosette JJ. The correlation between the electrode configuration and histopathology of irreversible electroporation ablations in prostate cancer patients. World J Urol. 2016 May;34(5):657-64. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1661-x. Epub 2015 Aug 22.

  • van den Bos W, de Bruin DM, Muller BG, Varkarakis IM, Karagiannis AA, Zondervan PJ, Laguna Pes MP, Veelo DP, Savci Heijink CD, Engelbrecht MRW, Wijkstra H, de Reijke TM, de la Rosette JJMCH. The safety and efficacy of irreversible electroporation for the ablation of prostate cancer: a multicentre prospective human in vivo pilot study protocol. BMJ Open. 2014 Oct 29;4(10):e006382. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006382.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Prostatic Neoplasms

Interventions

Electroporation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genital Neoplasms, MaleUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsGenital Diseases, MaleGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesProstatic DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cytological TechniquesClinical Laboratory TechniquesInvestigative TechniquesElectrochemical Techniques

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 8, 2013

First Posted

February 13, 2013

Study Start

August 1, 2013

Primary Completion

October 1, 2014

Study Completion

October 1, 2014

Last Updated

February 20, 2015

Record last verified: 2014-08

Locations