Very Intensive Early Walking in Stroke
VIEWS
Improving the Delivery of Intensive Gait Training in the Clinical Setting to Augment Community Ambulation
1 other identifier
interventional
56
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy of intensive locomotor interventions early post stroke. An intensive locomotor training (LT) program will be compared to an active control, conventional physical therapy. It is proposed that an early and intensive stepping paradigm that is not typically employed early in physical therapy will lead to superior outcomes and improved community mobility. A randomized, blinded, controlled trial will test subjects with moderate to severe locomotor dysfunction in individuals post-stroke to compare walking-related outcomes after intensive gait training (including treadmill, overground, stair training, and skilled walking training) to outcomes after conventional physical therapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable stroke
Started Oct 2008
Longer than P75 for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 14, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 12, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2015
CompletedSeptember 9, 2015
September 1, 2015
6.8 years
May 14, 2012
September 8, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in 10 meter walk test
Gait speed
Pre Test, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 3 month follow up
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change in 6 min walk test
0, 4, 8 weeks post-training and 2 month follow-up
Change in Berg Balance Scale
0. 4. 8 weeks post-training and 2 month follow-up
Study Arms (2)
Intensive Walking
EXPERIMENTALHigh intensity walking training in variable context for 8 weeks
Conventional Physical Therapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORRegular physical therapy for 8 weeks
Interventions
8 weeks high intensity walking training over multiple stepping tasks
Regular physical therapy for 8 weeks
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- subacute (\<6 months) stroke
- years old
- history of history of unilateral, supratentorial, ischemic or hemorrhage stroke
- able to walk 10m without physical assistance
- gait speed less than or equal to .8m/s
- medical clearance
You may not qualify if:
- significant cardiorespiratory or metabolic disease that may limit exercise participation
- weight limit \> 250 lbs (limit of most counter-weight safety systems)
- history of previous orthopedic or neurological conditions which may impair walking.
- women of childbearing potential will not be excluded, although women who are pregnant will be excluded due to potential forces at trunk from the harness applied at the waist.
- subjects with scores \< 23 on the Mini Mental Status Exam
- pacemaker
- metal implants in the head region
- history of epilepsy or seizures
- skull fractures or skull deficits
- concussion within the last 6 months
- unexplained recurring headaches
- medications that lower seizure threshold
- pregnancy
- aneurysm clip or coil
- metal or wire implants
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
Related Publications (3)
Hornby TG, Rafferty MR, Pinto D, French D, Jordan N. Cost-Effectiveness of High-intensity Training vs Conventional Therapy for Individuals With Subacute Stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Jul;103(7S):S197-S204. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.05.017. Epub 2021 Jul 3.
PMID: 34228956DERIVEDHornby TG, Henderson CE, Holleran CL, Lovell L, Roth EJ, Jang JH. Stepwise Regression and Latent Profile Analyses of Locomotor Outcomes Poststroke. Stroke. 2020 Oct;51(10):3074-3082. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031065. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
PMID: 32883192DERIVEDHornby TG, Holleran CL, Hennessy PW, Leddy AL, Connolly M, Camardo J, Woodward J, Mahtani G, Lovell L, Roth EJ. Variable Intensive Early Walking Poststroke (VIEWS): A Randomized Controlled Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016 Jun;30(5):440-50. doi: 10.1177/1545968315604396. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
PMID: 26338433DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
George T Hornby, PT, PhD
Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- T. George Hornby, PT, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 14, 2012
First Posted
February 12, 2013
Study Start
October 1, 2008
Primary Completion
August 1, 2015
Study Completion
August 1, 2015
Last Updated
September 9, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-09