NCT01789294

Brief Summary

Aim of this prospective, parallel multi-arm, randomized, clinical trial, was to compare the clinical outcome of patients Methods.We recruited children who undergone diagnostic colonoscopy in Umberto I Pediatric Department (Rome, Italy) from 2008 to 2010. Eligibility criteria were: 1) only demonstration of LNH; 2) no concomitant disease; 3) no treatment assumed since the clinical onset. Patients were allocated 1:1:1 to dietetic (Group A) vs mesalamine (Group B) vs no treatment (Group C) for a 8-weeks period. Skin prick tests and patch test for common foods, and symptoms scoring at baseline and follow up have been performed by blinded clinicians. Chi-square test for trend was used to compare the frequency of symptoms score improvement (\>1 point) among groups. The association of baseline features of patients with the clinical response was estimated by frequency analysis.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
270

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2008

Longer than P75 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2008

Completed
4.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2013

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 6, 2013

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 12, 2013

Completed
17 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

February 12, 2013

Status Verified

November 1, 2008

Enrollment Period

4.3 years

First QC Date

February 6, 2013

Last Update Submit

February 8, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

lymphoid nodular hyperplasiafood allergy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Efficacy

    to identify an appropriate management approach for LNH by evaluation of clinical severity and response. Clinical severity at time 0 and 1 was assessed by Pediatric Gastroenterologists blinded to allocation concealment. Basing on standardized Childhood behaviour checklists questionaire compiled by parents, symptoms were graded using a validated score of abdominal pain (from 0 to 12). Clinical response was defined as the improvement of at least 1 point in symptom scores from time 0 to 1.

    8 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • predictive factors

    8 weeks

Study Arms (3)

Mesalamine

EXPERIMENTAL

A standard 50 mg/kg/die daily dose of oral mesalamine was prescribed by Pediatric Gastroenterologists, which informed parents of potential side effects

Drug: Mesalamine

Observation

NO INTERVENTION

A close clinical observation without therapy was taken in control patients, whom parents were alerted to refer immediately if symptoms persisted or get worse.

DIET

EXPERIMENTAL

Dietetic avoidance of cow's milk and egg, plus foods eventually detected by skin tests, was prescribed by Pediatric Allergologists

Behavioral: DIET

Interventions

A standard 50 mg/kg/die daily dose of oral mesalamine was prescribed by Pediatric Gastroenterologists, which informed parents of potential side effects. Whether the drug was not well tolerated, patients were drop out. Treatment was discontinued at time 1 to look for symptom recurrence.

Mesalamine
DIETBEHAVIORAL

Dietetic avoidance of cow's milk and egg, plus foods eventually detected by skin tests, was prescribed by Pediatric Allergologists. To ensure the correct adherence to diet with no nutritional impairment, a scheme of admitted foods and an appropriate calcium supplement dose were given to patients.

DIET

Eligibility Criteria

Age6 Months - 18 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • isolated finding of LNH\[18\], defined as the demonstration of a significant cluster of lymphoid nodules (\>10/visible field) by endoscopy and lymphoid follicle hyperplasia by hystology;
  • negative results of preliminary evaluation

You may not qualify if:

  • diagnosis of concomitant inflammatory, rheumatic or infectious disease, and
  • the assumption of any dietetic or therapy since the clinical onset.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Departments of Pediatrics, Sapienza - University of Rome

Rome, 00161, Italy

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Food Hypersensitivity

Interventions

MesalamineDiet

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Hypersensitivity, ImmediateHypersensitivityImmune System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

meta-AminobenzoatesAminobenzoatesBenzoatesAcids, CarbocyclicCarboxylic AcidsOrganic ChemicalsAminosalicylic AcidsSalicylatesHydroxybenzoatesHydroxy AcidsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsPhenolsNutritional Physiological PhenomenaDiet, Food, and NutritionPhysiological Phenomena

Central Study Contacts

Giovanni Di Nardo, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 6, 2013

First Posted

February 12, 2013

Study Start

November 1, 2008

Primary Completion

February 1, 2013

Study Completion

March 1, 2013

Last Updated

February 12, 2013

Record last verified: 2008-11

Locations