NCT01788358

Brief Summary

This study examines the long term safety and efficacy of the Fixed Dose combination BAY98-7106 (nifedipine plus candesartan primarily at the highest dose in development) in patients with moderate to severe hypertension. Patients meeting the entry criteria, will receive the Fixed Dose combination for 28 weeks, including 8 weeks with stepwise dose increase up to the high target dose. The first 200 subjects completing 28 weeks will continue treatment for additional 24 weeks (52 weeks in total). Subjects who do not tolerate an increased dose will be treated at their highest tolerable dose.

Trial Health

93
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
508

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3 hypertension

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2013

Geographic Reach
6 countries

82 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 7, 2013

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 11, 2013

Completed
3 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 14, 2013

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2014

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 17, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

October 24, 2017

Status Verified

September 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

February 7, 2013

Results QC Date

July 21, 2015

Last Update Submit

September 22, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Drug combinationNifedipine GITSCandesartan CilexetilHypertensionCombination therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Number of Subjects With All Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Drug-related TEAEs up to Week 28

    An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence (that is, any unfavorable and unintended sign \[including abnormal laboratory findings\], symptom or disease) in a subject or clinical investigation subject after providing written informed consent for participation in the study. AEs were considered to be treatment-emergent if they had started or worsened after first application of study medication.

    From the time of first study drug administration up to Week 28

  • Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) of Special Interest up to Week 28

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence (that is, any unfavorable and unintended sign \[including abnormal laboratory findings\], symptom or disease) in a subject or clinical investigation subject after providing written informed consent for participation in the study. AEs were considered to be treatment-emergent if they had started or worsened after first application of study medication. TEAEs of special interest included the incidence of symptomatic hypotension and the incidence and severity of vasodilatory adverse events (such as oedema, headache, and flushing). Only subjects who had TEAEs of special interest as mild, moderate or severe were reported.

    From the time of first study drug administration up to Week 28

  • Number of Subjects With All Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Drug-related TEAEs up to Week 52/End of Study (EOS)

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence (that is, any unfavorable and unintended sign \[including abnormal laboratory findings\], symptom or disease) in a subject or clinical investigation subject after providing written informed consent for participation in the study. AEs were considered to be treatment-emergent if they had started or worsened after first application of study medication.

    From the time of first study drug administration up to Week 52/EOS

  • Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) of Special Interest up to Week 52/End of Study (EOS)

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence (that is, any unfavorable and unintended sign \[including abnormal laboratory findings\], symptom or disease) in a subject or clinical investigation subject after providing written informed consent for participation in the study. AEs were considered to be treatment-emergent if they had started or worsened after first application of study medication. TEAEs of special interest included the incidence of symptomatic hypotension and the incidence and severity of vasodilatory adverse events (such as oedema, headache, and flushing). Only subjects who had TEAEs of special interest as mild, moderate or severe were reported.

    From the time of study treatment up to Week 52/EOS

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Number of Subjects With Clinically Relevant Changes in Laboratory Parameters

    Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 52/EOS

  • Change From Baseline In Mean Seated Systolic Blood Pressure (MSSBP) At Weeks 28 And 52

    Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 28 and 52

  • Change From Baseline in Mean Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure (MSDBP) at Weeks 28 and 52

    Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 28 and 52

  • Blood Pressure Control Rate at Weeks 28 and 52

    Weeks 28 and 52

  • Blood Pressure Response Rate at Weeks 28 and 52

    Weeks 28 and 52

Study Arms (1)

Nifedipine GITS/Candesartan Cilexetil FDC (BAY98-7106)

EXPERIMENTAL

Subjects received nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) / candesartan cilexetil fixed dose combination (FDC) (BAY98-7106) tablet orally, once daily in the morning of Visit 1 (Week 0) for 28 or 52 weeks. The starting dose (30/8 milligram \[mg\] or 30/16 mg) was determined based on local practice and clinical judgment by the investigator. Based on the experience of symptomatic and asymptomatic hypotension, peripheral edema or significant tolerability, the doses were up-titrated to the highest target dose (60/32 mg).

Drug: Nifedipine GITS/Candesartan Cilexetil FDC(BAY98-7106)

Interventions

Nifedipine GITS/Candesartan Cilexetil FDC(BAY98-7106), tablet, 30/8 mg, orally once daily

Nifedipine GITS/Candesartan Cilexetil FDC (BAY98-7106)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subjects must have moderate to severe essential hypertension (Grade 2 or Grade 3, WHO classifications). At Visit 1, subjects not treated with antihypertensive medications are to have MSSBP of \>/= 160 mmHg and \< 200 mmHg, as measured by a calibrated electronic BP measuring device. For other subjects who are treated with antihypertensive medication before, they should have MSSBP \>/= 160 mmHg and \<200 mmHg after wash out.
  • Women of childbearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception other than hormonal contraceptives when sexually active

You may not qualify if:

  • Mean seated systolic blood pressure \>/= 200 mmHg and/or mean seated diastolic blood pressure \>/= 120 mm/Hg
  • Mean seated diastolic blood pressure \< 60 mm/Hg
  • Differences greater than 20 mmHg for systolic blood pressure and 10 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure are present on 3 consecutive blood pressure readings at visit 0
  • Any history of hypertensive emergency
  • Evidence of secondary hypertension such as coarctation of the aorta, pheochromocytoma, hyperaldosteronism, etc.
  • Cerebrovascular ischemic event (stroke, transient ischemic attack \[TIA\])within the previous 12 months
  • History of intracerebral hemorrhage or subarachnoid hemorrhage
  • History of hypertensive retinopathy - known Keith-Wagener Grade III or IV
  • Any history of heart failure, New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification III or IV
  • Severe coronary heart disease as manifest by a history of myocardial infarction or unstable angina in the last 6 months prior to visit 0
  • Type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM) or poorly controlled Type 2 DM as evidenced by HbA1C of greater than 9% on visit 0.
  • Hyperkalemia: potassium above the upper limit of normal in the laboratory range

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (82)

Unknown Facility

Foley, Alabama, 36535, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Carmichael, California, 95608, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Los Angeles, California, 90057, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Spring Valley, California, 91978, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Milford, Connecticut, 06460, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Coral Gables, Florida, 33114-4192, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Hallandale, Florida, 33009, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Hollywood, Florida, 33083, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Jacksonville, Florida, 32216, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Jupiter, Florida, 33458, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Tampa, Florida, 33606, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Atlanta, Georgia, 30338, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Valparaiso, Indiana, 46383, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Newton, Kansas, 67114, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Wichita, Kansas, 67205, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Lexington, Kentucky, 40504, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

New Orleans, Louisiana, 70119, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Auburn, Maine, 04240, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Elkridge, Maryland, 21075, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Brockton, Massachusetts, 02301, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

St Louis, Missouri, 63141, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Shelby, North Carolina, 28150, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Cincinnati, Ohio, 45224, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Cincinnati, Ohio, 45245, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Cincinnati, Ohio, 45246, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Columbus, Ohio, 43213, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Greenville, South Carolina, 29615, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, 29464, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Rapid City, South Dakota, 57702, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Nashville, Tennessee, 37203, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

New Tazewell, Tennessee, 37825, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Beaumont, Texas, 77701, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Bryan, Texas, 77802, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Carrollton, Texas, 75010, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Dallas, Texas, 75230, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Salt Lake City, Utah, 84109, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Salt Lake City, Utah, 84121, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Kenosha, Wisconsin, 53142, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Moorsel, Oost-Vlaanderen, 9310, Belgium

Location

Unknown Facility

Wetteren, Oost-Vlaanderen, 9230, Belgium

Location

Unknown Facility

Steenokkerzeel, Vlaams Brabant, 1820, Belgium

Location

Unknown Facility

Deurne, 2100, Belgium

Location

Unknown Facility

Ham, 3545, Belgium

Location

Unknown Facility

Burnaby, British Columbia, V5G 1T4, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Langley, British Columbia, V3A 4H9, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1K3, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Brampton, Ontario, L6T 0G1, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Burlington, Ontario, L7M 4Y1, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Etobicoke, Ontario, M8V 3X8, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

London, Ontario, N5W 6A2, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Newmarket, Ontario, L3Y 5G8, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Sarnia, Ontario, N7T 4X3, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Stayner, Ontario, L0M 1S0, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Toronto, Ontario, M4S 1Y2, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Toronto, Ontario, M9V 4B4, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Woodstock, Ontario, N4S 4G3, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Pointe-Claire, Quebec, H9R 3J1, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Ste-Foy, Quebec, G1W 1S2, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, 60313, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Bochum, North Rhine-Westphalia, 44787, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Görlitz, Saxony, 02826, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Leipzig, Saxony, 04103, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Magdeburg, Saxony-Anhalt, 39104, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Berlin, 12627, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Dresden, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Gdynia, 81-384, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Katowice, 40-040, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Warsaw, 01-192, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Wroclaw, 50-088, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Reading, Berkshire, RG2 0TG, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Chesterfield, Derbyshire, S40 4AA, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Blackpool, Lancashire, FY3 7EN, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Bath, Somerset, BA3 2UH, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Bury Saint Edmonds, Suffolk, IP30 9QU, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Coventry, Warwickshire, CV6 4DD, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Birmingham, West Midlands, B15 2SQ, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Cardiff, CF14 5GJ, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Chorley, PR7 7NA, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Glasgow, G20 OSP, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Liverpool, L22 0LG, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Manchester, M15 6SX, United Kingdom

Location

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hypertension

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Vascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Therapeutic Area Head
Organization
Bayer HealthCare AG

Study Officials

  • Bayer Study Director

    Bayer

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
LTE60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 7, 2013

First Posted

February 11, 2013

Study Start

February 14, 2013

Primary Completion

May 1, 2014

Study Completion

May 1, 2014

Last Updated

October 24, 2017

Results First Posted

August 17, 2015

Record last verified: 2017-09

Locations