Comparison of Capso Vision SV-1 to PillCam SB2 in the Evaluation of Subjects With Suspected Small Bowel Disease
1 other identifier
interventional
121
2 countries
7
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical findings involving the small bowel obtained with the Capso Vision Video Capsule Device to those results obtained with the PillCam SB2.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 2, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 11, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 10, 2017
CompletedMay 10, 2017
March 1, 2017
2.9 years
May 2, 2012
November 30, 2016
March 31, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Normal vs Abnormal, Overall Impression
The review of images of suspected diseased small bowel to determine agreement among readers between the two image capture systems: CapsoCam SV-1 and PillCam SB2. The proportion of Normal vs Abnormal, Overall Impression based upon the result of 2 out of 3 data readers in agreement.
Study Completion
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Comparison of SB Transit Times With CapsoCam SV-1 and PillCam SB2
Study Completion
Comparison of Diagnostic Yield of CapsoCam SV-1 as Compared to PillCam SB2
Study Completion
Preference Between CapsoCam SV-1 and PillCam SB2
Study Completion
Study Arms (2)
PillCam SB2 then CapsoCam SV-1
OTHERPillCam SB2 capsule then CapsoCam SV-1 capsule
CapsoCam SV-1 then PillCam SB2
OTHERCapsoCam SV-1 capsule then PillCam SB2 capsule
Interventions
Capsule Endoscopy system
Capsule endoscopy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female between 18 to 85 years of age (inclusive).
- Willing and able to provide written informed consent.
- Subjects with suspected small bowel disease who are referred for capsule endoscopy. Suspected small bowel disease includes suspected small bowel bleeding (including obscure gastrointestinal bleed), suspected or established Crohn's Disease \[should have had patency capsule, CT or MR enterography before entry\], suspected or known celiac disease, suspected small bowel tumor or familial polyposis syndrome.
- If subject was referred for capsule endoscopy (CE) for identification of occult GI bleeding, has the subject undergone a non-diagnostic esophagoduodenoscopy and colonoscopy as part of their evaluation, OR has the subject had continued bleeding requiring transfusion since the initial evaluation, OR does the subject have the following hematocrit values \<31% in males or \<28% in females.
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects who had a prior negative capsule endoscopy (within 1 year of study).
- Known or suspected obstruction or stricture unless patency capsule confirms patency.
- Known or suspected gastrointestinal perforation.
- Known or suspected small bowel diverticuli.
- Known swallowing disorder or the inability or unwillingness to swallow pills.
- Radiation or chemotherapy induced enteritis.
- History of Zenker's or known duodenal or jejunal diverticula.
- Isolated diarrhea or isolated abdominal pain without alarm signs or symptoms
- Subjects who are high risk for undergoing surgical interventions (i.e., to CONFIDENTIAL CapsoVision Protocol SV-1 Revision: October 17, 2011 7 remove the capsule when capsule retention occurs).
- Subjects with DNR/DNI "do not resuscitate/do not intubate" status.
- Known or suspected gastrointestinal dysmotility.
- Presence of cardiac pacemaker, implanted defibrillator or other electromedical implant.
- History of skin reaction to adhesives.
- Subjects who in the Investigator's opinion should not consume the 2L GoLytely and 10 mg bisacodyl study drugs, because it could pose a significant additional risk to the subject because of the subject's medical condition.
- Subjects who are scheduled for an MRI within 30 days of the last study visit.
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (7)
Shabana F. Pasha, MD
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85259, United States
Gastro Health
Miami, Florida, 33173, United States
University of Massachusetts, Worcester
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655, United States
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425, United States
Ziad Younes, MD
Germantown, Tennessee, 38138, United States
UT Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75390, United States
Pacific Gastroenterology Associates GI Research Institute
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 2K5, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Director of Clinical Affairs
- Organization
- CapsoVision, Inc.
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shabana F Pasha, MD
Mayo Clinic
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 2, 2012
First Posted
February 11, 2013
Study Start
May 1, 2012
Primary Completion
April 1, 2015
Study Completion
February 1, 2016
Last Updated
May 10, 2017
Results First Posted
May 10, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share