Training Effects in Colonoscopy
TraCo
The Impact of Training Effects on Quality Indicators in Colonoscopy: a Retrospective Study.
1 other identifier
observational
3,500
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Colon cancer is the second most common cause of death among cancer-related deaths in Germany. Precancerous lesions such as adenomas can be detected efficiently by colonoscopy. To provide high quality in colonoscopy several quality parameters have been postulated in the past. The adenoma detection rate (ADR) is one of those parameters. Empirical data suggest that a detection rate of 20% should be demanded. Detection rates are influenced by a multitude of circumstances such as bowel cleanness. The facts that detection rates vary between colonoscopists suggests that leaning effects may also play a role. It is not known how ADR and other quality parameters evolve while trainees improve their skills in colonoscopy. The investigators postulate that a learning curve exists. The investigators therefore plan to evaluate chronologically the findings of trainee colonoscopists. A particular performance in detecting adenomas shall be calculated in relation to the amount of examinations performed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Feb 2013
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 5, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 7, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2014
CompletedFebruary 6, 2014
February 1, 2013
11 months
February 5, 2013
February 5, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Adenoma detection rate
While numbers of investigations rise new detection rates are calculated for each colonoscopist.
every 50 examinations
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Polyp detection rate
every 50 examinations
Other Outcomes (1)
Amount of sedative used
every 50 exmainations
Study Arms (10)
Colonoscopist A
Colonoscopist B
Colonoscopist C
Colonoscopist D
Colonoscopist E
Colonoscopist F
Colonoscopist G
Colonoscopist H
Colonoscopist I
Colonoscopist J
Eligibility Criteria
Endoscopy Department of a university Hospital
You may qualify if:
- colonoscopy performed at the Technical University Munich, Germany
You may not qualify if:
- colonoscopy performed for the purpose of polypectomy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik der Technischen Universität München
Munich, Bavaria, 81675, Germany
Biospecimen
Histological findings are recorded
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 5, 2013
First Posted
February 7, 2013
Study Start
February 1, 2013
Primary Completion
January 1, 2014
Study Completion
January 1, 2014
Last Updated
February 6, 2014
Record last verified: 2013-02