Antispastic Effect of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Patients With Cerebral and Spinal Spasticity
ANTMS
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Spasticity - movement disorder, which is part of the syndrome of defeat top motor-neuron, characterized by the rate-dependent increase in muscle tone and increased dry-core reflections from hyperexcitability of stretch receptors (Lance, 1980). Spasticity - a frequent symptom of neurological diseases (Valero-Cabre, Pascual-Leone, 2005) and may be accompanied by such a disorders consequences of stroke, multiple sclerosis, head trauma and spinal cord, cerebral palsy, etc. The magnitude and severity of spasticity depends on the level of the lesion, the duration of its existence from the time before the disease, and possible plastic changes in axons and synapses on the affected level. There are two basic models of spasticity: cerebral (hemiplegic) and spinal (paraplegicheskaya) (Nikitin, 2005). Cerebral model appears with the direct injury of the brain and is characterized by increased excitability of monosynaptic reflexes with the rapid development of pathological ref-plexes and characteristic hemiplegic posture. Model is characterized by spinal spasticity opposite lower segmental inhibition polysynaptic reflexes slow increase of nervous excitability due to the mechanism of cumulative excitation perevozbuzhdeniem flexor and razgibate-ing, as well as expansion of the area of segmental responses (Nikitin, 2005). As spinal and cerebral spasticity are extremely difficult corrected by standard medical clinic and physiotherapy methods. In this regard, in the world literature actively searched for addi-tional search correct this symptom. A new modern methods that could affect the syndrome of spasticity is rhythmic transcranial magnetic stimulation (Mori et al., 2009).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Feb 2013
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 5, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 7, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2015
CompletedNovember 7, 2014
November 1, 2014
2.6 years
February 5, 2013
November 5, 2014
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Stroke
20 days
Epileptic seizure
20 days
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The patient is discharged from clinic
20 days
Other Outcomes (1)
Pregnancy
20 days
Study Arms (4)
Sham
SHAM COMPARATORImitation of stimulation.
High-frequency stimulation
EXPERIMENTALHigh-frequency stimulation
TBS Theta burst stimulation
EXPERIMENTALTBS Theta burst stimulation
Low-frequency stimulation
EXPERIMENTALLow-frequency stimulation
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The age of the patients and healthy volunteers from 18 to 70 years
- persons with confirmed and verified lesion of the central nervous system (the effects of CVD, multiple sclerosis, traumatic brain injury, SMC) with symptoms of spasticity any vyrazhenngosti;
- informed consent;
- healthy volunteers who gave informed consent to participate in the study.
- The criteria included:
- The presence of an implanted pacemaker, intracardiac catheters, electronic pumps;
- The difficult patient, requiring the maintenance of vital functions by hardware (mechanical ventilation, continuous application infusomats), including an increase of neurological symptoms after 8 days from the start of CVD, acute myocardial infarction, venous thrombosis of the lower extremities, episodes of pulmonary embolism;
- The severity of the neurological deficit, which does not allow the patient to go through 10 meters (you can use an additional support);
- Pregnancy or possibility of pregnancy in women of childbearing age (before menopause), according to a pregnancy test;
- The presence of metal implants or in the head area, located closer than 20 cm from the edge of the surface coil magnetic stimulator, with the exception of the mouth (metal brackets, vascular sutures, metal plate covering defects in the skull, metallic foreign body in the cavity of the skull);
- Identification of epileptiform activity during the screening EEG prior to the study;
- Epilepsy or seizures in history;
- Failure of a patient to participate in the study;
You may not qualify if:
- Identification of the study a total intolerance to a pulsed magnetic field;
- Installation of the pacemaker, intracardiac catheters or operations on the brain, requiring the abandonment of metal objects in the cranial cavity;
- Pregnancy;
- Enhancement of the patient, which requires the maintenance of vital functions by hardware (mechanical ventilation, continuous application infusomats);
- The emergence of an epileptic seizure in response to rhythmic TMS;
- Failure of the patient to continue participation in the study;
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Research center of neurology RAMS
Moscow, Volokolamskoe Shosse, 80, 125367, Russia
Related Publications (21)
Korniukhina EIu, Chrnikova LA, Ivanova-Smolenskaia IA, Karabanov AV. [Application of transcranial pulsed electrostimulation and an alternating electrostatic field to the treatment of "restless legs" syndrome in patients with Parkinson disease]. Vopr Kurortol Fizioter Lech Fiz Kult. 2010 Mar-Apr;(2):38-41. Russian.
PMID: 21089214BACKGROUNDKremneva EI, Chernikova LA, Konovalov RN, Krotenkova MV, Saenko IV, Kozlovskaia IB. [Activation of the sensorimotor cortex with the use of a device for the mechanical stimulation of the plantar support zones]. Fiziol Cheloveka. 2012 Jan-Feb;38(1):61-8. Russian.
PMID: 22567837BACKGROUNDValero-Cabre A, Pascual-Leone A. Impact of TMS on the primary motor cortex and associated spinal systems. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2005 Jan-Feb;24(1):29-35. doi: 10.1109/memb.2005.1384097. No abstract available.
PMID: 15709533BACKGROUNDMori F, Koch G, Foti C, Bernardi G, Centonze D. The use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for the treatment of spasticity. Prog Brain Res. 2009;175:429-39. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17528-3.
PMID: 19660671BACKGROUNDYoung RR. Spasticity: a review. Neurology. 1994 Nov;44(11 Suppl 9):S12-20.
PMID: 7970006BACKGROUNDNielsen JF, Sinkjaer T, Jakobsen J. Treatment of spasticity with repetitive magnetic stimulation; a double-blind placebo-controlled study. Mult Scler. 1996 Dec;2(5):227-32. doi: 10.1177/135245859600200503.
PMID: 9050361BACKGROUNDMeunier S, Pierrot-Deseilligny E. Cortical control of presynaptic inhibition of Ia afferents in humans. Exp Brain Res. 1998 Apr;119(4):415-26. doi: 10.1007/s002210050357.
PMID: 9588776BACKGROUNDDelwaide PJ, Oliver E. Short-latency autogenic inhibition (IB inhibition) in human spasticity. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1988 Dec;51(12):1546-50. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.51.12.1546.
PMID: 3221221BACKGROUNDKatz R, Pierrot-Deseilligny E, Hultborn H. Recurrent inhibition of motoneurones prior to and during ramp and ballistic movements. Neurosci Lett. 1982 Aug 16;31(2):141-5. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(82)90106-9. No abstract available.
PMID: 7133550BACKGROUNDKatz R, Pierrot-Deseilligny E. Recurrent inhibition in humans. Prog Neurobiol. 1999 Feb;57(3):325-55. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0082(98)00056-2.
PMID: 10096844BACKGROUNDValle AC, Dionisio K, Pitskel NB, Pascual-Leone A, Orsati F, Ferreira MJ, Boggio PS, Lima MC, Rigonatti SP, Fregni F. Low and high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of spasticity. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007 Jul;49(7):534-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00534.x.
PMID: 17593127BACKGROUNDValero-Cabre A, Oliveri M, Gangitano M, Pascual-Leone A. Modulation of spinal cord excitability by subthreshold repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the primary motor cortex in humans. Neuroreport. 2001 Dec 4;12(17):3845-8. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200112040-00048.
PMID: 11726806BACKGROUNDKumru H, Murillo N, Samso JV, Valls-Sole J, Edwards D, Pelayo R, Valero-Cabre A, Tormos JM, Pascual-Leone A. Reduction of spasticity with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010 Jun;24(5):435-41. doi: 10.1177/1545968309356095. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
PMID: 20053952BACKGROUNDMori F, Ljoka C, Magni E, Codeca C, Kusayanagi H, Monteleone F, Sancesario A, Bernardi G, Koch G, Foti C, Centonze D. Transcranial magnetic stimulation primes the effects of exercise therapy in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol. 2011 Jul;258(7):1281-7. doi: 10.1007/s00415-011-5924-1. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
PMID: 21286740BACKGROUNDChen R, Classen J, Gerloff C, Celnik P, Wassermann EM, Hallett M, Cohen LG. Depression of motor cortex excitability by low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology. 1997 May;48(5):1398-403. doi: 10.1212/wnl.48.5.1398.
PMID: 9153480BACKGROUNDChen JT, Chen CC, Kao KP, Wu ZA, Liao KK. Conditioning effect on the long latency potentials in the lower limb to transcranial magnetic stimulation. Acta Neurol Scand. 1998 Dec;98(6):412-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1998.tb07323.x.
PMID: 9875620BACKGROUNDBerardelli A, Inghilleri M, Rothwell JC, Romeo S, Curra A, Gilio F, Modugno N, Manfredi M. Facilitation of muscle evoked responses after repetitive cortical stimulation in man. Exp Brain Res. 1998 Sep;122(1):79-84. doi: 10.1007/s002210050493.
PMID: 9772114BACKGROUNDTouge T, Gerschlager W, Brown P, Rothwell JC. Are the after-effects of low-frequency rTMS on motor cortex excitability due to changes in the efficacy of cortical synapses? Clin Neurophysiol. 2001 Nov;112(11):2138-45. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(01)00651-4.
PMID: 11682353BACKGROUNDPerez MA, Lungholt BK, Nielsen JB. Short-term adaptations in spinal cord circuits evoked by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: possible underlying mechanisms. Exp Brain Res. 2005 Apr;162(2):202-12. doi: 10.1007/s00221-004-2144-2. Epub 2004 Dec 7.
PMID: 15586273BACKGROUNDConte A, Belvisi D, Iezzi E, Mari F, Inghilleri M, Berardelli A. Effects of attention on inhibitory and facilitatory phenomena elicited by paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation in healthy subjects. Exp Brain Res. 2008 Apr;186(3):393-9. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1244-1. Epub 2008 Jan 23.
PMID: 18214454BACKGROUNDDi Lazzaro V, Pilato F, Oliviero A, Dileone M, Saturno E, Mazzone P, Insola A, Profice P, Ranieri F, Capone F, Tonali PA, Rothwell JC. Origin of facilitation of motor-evoked potentials after paired magnetic stimulation: direct recording of epidural activity in conscious humans. J Neurophysiol. 2006 Oct;96(4):1765-71. doi: 10.1152/jn.00360.2006. Epub 2006 Jun 7.
PMID: 16760345BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Russian academy of medical science
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 5, 2013
First Posted
February 7, 2013
Study Start
February 1, 2013
Primary Completion
September 1, 2015
Study Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
November 7, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-11