Traumatic Optic Neuropathy Treatment Trial (TONTT)
TONTT
Study of Visual Recovery After Erythropoietin (EPO) Injection, in Patients With Traumatic Optic Neuropathy (TON)
1 other identifier
interventional
117
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The pathophysiology of Traumatic Optic Neuropathy (TON) is thought to be multifactorial, and some researchers have also postulated a primary and secondary mechanism of injury.TON is categorized as direct or indirect.In indirect TON cases, the injury to the axons is thought to be induced by shearing forces that are transmitted to the fibers or to the vascular supply of the nerve. Studies have shown that forces applied to the frontal bone and malar eminences are transferred and concentrated in the area near the optic canal. The tight adherence of the optic nerve's dural sheath to the periosteum within the optic canal is also thought to contribute to this segment of the nerve being extremely susceptible to the deformative stresses of the skull bones. Such injury leads to ischemic injury to the axons of the retinal ganglion cells within the optic canal. At present, no studies validate a particular approach to the management of TON. There are three management lines for these patients that include 1)observation only;2)medical treatment with high or megadoses of methylprednisolone; and 3)surgical intervention. Generally no line precedes the others and additionally, medical or surgical interventions may result in serious side effects or complications. In 2005, the results of the Corticosteroid Randomization after Significant Head Injury (CRASH) trial raised concerns regarding the use of mega dose steroids in traumatic brain injury. This study was the largest randomized study that evaluated steroids in patients with traumatic brain injury and was stopped early due to the significantly increased risk of death in patients that received mega dose steroids at their 6-month follow-up when compared with the placebo group (25.7% vs 22.3%; Relative Risk 1.15 Confidence Interval 1.07 to 1.24; p=0.0001). Although the etiology of the increased risk of death was not determined, the findings of this study should be taken into consideration when managing cases of TON with concurrent traumatic brain injury. Very recently it has been shown the cytokine hormone erythropoietin (EPO) that had been long known and used as a valuable agent to promote hematopoiesis has been protective in experimental models of mechanical trauma, neuroinflammation, cerebral and retinal ischemia, and even in a human stroke trial, and most notably in optic nerve transection. A double blind placebo-controlled multicenter trial on EPO add-on treatment in chronic schizophrenic men was performed. Treatment over 12 weeks with high-dose weekly (40,000 IU intravenously) EPO led to significant improvement of cognitive performance compared to placebo controls. Different studies have been performed on the effect of EPO on neuropathy in different studies. The investigators recently published our results on treating patients with TON with EPO and found it safe and effective. Patients were compared with a historical control group of patients who received no treatment for TON. A better visual recovery was found. The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of EPO on TON in a Multi- center clinical trial using a semi-experimental design.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1
Started Feb 2015
Typical duration for phase_1
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 5, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 12, 2018
CompletedMay 7, 2019
April 1, 2016
1.2 years
February 1, 2013
April 7, 2017
April 24, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Change/Improvement Visual Acuity From the Beseline
Best corrected visual acuity will measure at 1,2,3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks and 1 month and at least 3 months after treatment. Improvement is defined based on 1) mean logMAR\[12\], 2) 0.3 change in logMAR (improvement, deterioration, and no change) \[12,16\] , 3) mean improvement percentage which is calculated as: improvement%= (logMar ( of VA after treatment)-logMar ( of initial VA))/(logMar(20/13)˟-logMar ( of initial VA) 4) percentage of patients at different ordinal categorization of the BCVA as no light perception (NLP), light perception (LP)and hand motion (HM), count fingers (CF), and ≥ 20/200.
Change from baseline at least 3 months after treatment
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Relative Afferent Papillary Defect (RAPD) Grade +4
Change from baseline at least 3 months after treatment
Study Arms (3)
Recombinant human erythropoietin (EPO)
EXPERIMENTALIntravenous EPO 10,000 IU for 5-13 years of age and 20,000 IU for \>13 years/ day for 3 days
Methylprednisolone
ACTIVE COMPARATORJust Intravenous Methyl prednisolone 250 mg every 6 hours for 3 days.
Observation
OTHERObservation
Interventions
4000 units per vial
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Having indirect traumatic optic neuropathy, not more than 3 weeks between trauma and treatment, normal fundoscopy
You may not qualify if:
- Having other injuries that effect on visual function, direct optic neuropathy, glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, uncontrolled hypertension, polycythemia, creatinin more than 3 mg/dl, sensitivity to EPO, hyperkalemia, women who use contraceptive pill, pregnant and breast feeding women, history of stroke and cardiovascular diseases, having malignancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Tehran University of Medical Scienceslead
- Iran University of Medical Sciencescollaborator
- Mashhad University of Medical Sciencescollaborator
- Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciencescollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
Shiraz, Fars, Iran
Iran University of Medical Sciences
Tehran, 1467744814, Iran
Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
Tehran, Iran
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Mohsen Bahmani Kashkouli
- Organization
- Iran university of Medical Sciences
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Mohsen B Kashkouli, MD
Iran University of Medical Sciences
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 1, 2013
First Posted
February 5, 2013
Study Start
February 1, 2015
Primary Completion
April 1, 2016
Study Completion
February 1, 2017
Last Updated
May 7, 2019
Results First Posted
September 12, 2018
Record last verified: 2016-04