Identification of TT Cases by Community Treatment Assistants: An Assessment
SIMBA
1 other identifier
interventional
27,473
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To achieve the goal of trachoma control as mandated by the World Health Organization, countries must reduce the backlog of trichiasis surgery cases to less than 1/1,000 of their population. However, these cases reside in rural villages in trachoma endemic districts, and finding them to offer services is a challenge. Community Treatment Assistants (CTAs) are village residents who are trained to offer Mass Drug Administration (MDA) to their communities and hence are in contact with most residents. A training guide and tool for screening for trachomatous trichiasis (TT) will be developed to train CTAs in rural Tanzania to identify cases in their communities and refer them to surgery. Compared to the current process by which CTAs passively screen for TT if cases complaint, investigators hypothesize that the trained CTAs will identify twice the usual number of TT surgery cases during ongoing community antibiotic administrations for trachoma and will also miss fewer cases. If this simple system is effective, it can be implemented widely to screen communities for cases of TT. Residents from thirty-six villages holding MDA, for whom a complete census is available, will be randomized on a 1:1 basis to intervention (where the CTAs receive the enhanced training from the enhanced training team) and usual assessment (where the CTAs receive the usual instructions from the regular MDA team). In both arms, the CTAs will keep records of all cases they have screened as positive for TT amongst the residents. A Master TT grader will grade all screened cases of TT to determine the rate of true positivity in both arms.In addition, he will examine a random sample of residents who are screened as negative to detect potentially missed cases and estimate the total burden of trichiasis cases in both arms as well.The assessments of the Master TT grader will serve as the gold standard for calculations of sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the enhanced training versus usual assessment methods.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2013
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 30, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 5, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 23, 2018
CompletedMarch 21, 2018
February 1, 2018
10 months
January 30, 2013
April 26, 2017
February 22, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
TT Cases Screened Positive by CTA's and Confirmed by Graders
All the TT cases detected in control versus intervention arms (adjusted for population size) through screening were verified by graders. Grader re-graded all these cases except for the cases lost to follow-up.
10 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Sensitivity of TT Screening Methods
10 months
Specificity of TT Screening Methods
10 months
Positive Predictive Values of TT Screening Methods
10 months
Negative Predictive Values of TT Screening Methods
10 months
Study Arms (2)
Intervention arm
EXPERIMENTALCommunity treatment assistants (CTA ) will receive usual training, including the basic background of trachoma/trichiasis recognition, drug administration, and azithromycin dosing. In addition to the usual training, these CTA's will also receive an additional modest half day training for TT case recognition which is called the TT training program and TT Screening Card to help them identify TT cases and refer them for surgery.
Usual Assessment arm
NO INTERVENTIONCommunity treatment assistants will receive only usual training, including the basic background of trachoma/trichiasis recognition, drug administration, and azithromycin dosing.
Interventions
The intervention is an additional half day training program on trichiasis recognition (TT Training Program) and a TT Screening card to assist community treatment assistants in recognizing TT cases and referring them to surgery.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All persons in the study and control communities are eligible for the MDA.
- Adults aged 15 and over will be eligible for the survey and re-assessment.
- Those who are screened positive in the re-assessment will be eligible for treatment at the surgery camp.
- Those who are screened positive for TT initially but refuse the definitive re-screening will still be offered surgery but told they may not have TT and will be re-screened by the surgeon.
You may not qualify if:
- none
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Johns Hopkins Universitylead
- Lions Club International Foundationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
1. While use of CTAs in TT screening during MDA offers clear advantages, this approach is limited to areas that merit MDA. 2. Attrition of CTAs may also prove to be a limitation for this screening approach.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Sheila K West
- Organization
- Johns Hopkins University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sheila K West, PhD
Johns Hopkins University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 30, 2013
First Posted
February 5, 2013
Study Start
February 1, 2013
Primary Completion
December 1, 2013
Study Completion
December 1, 2013
Last Updated
March 21, 2018
Results First Posted
February 23, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-02