Comparison of Acetaminophen and PRP Therapy for Knee OA
1 other identifier
interventional
543
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to test whether the platelet-rich plasma (PRP) intra-articular injection therapy is effective as an alternative treatment option in patients with mild knee osteoarthritis within a controlled randomized study compared to first line treatment acetaminophen. The investigators will evaluate patients outcome in level of pain, knee function and quality of life before the treatment and at 6, 12 and 24 weeks follow up. The study will be complemented with in vitro experiments of human osteoarthritic cartilage explants culture (treated with PRP) for histological and gene expression assays. PRP intra-articular injections therapy is effective in patients with mild knee osteoarthritis by modifying the biochemical joint environment and cartilage regeneration capability.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis
Started May 2013
Typical duration for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 30, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 4, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 20, 2015
CompletedNovember 20, 2015
October 1, 2015
2.3 years
January 30, 2013
September 21, 2015
October 19, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Change in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)
The WOMAC evaluation will be performed on patients who received the treatment at 0, 6, 12, 24 weeks after treatment is finished. The WOMAC measures five items for pain (score range 0-20), two for stiffness (score range 0-8), and 17 for functional limitation (score range 0-68). A total WOMAC score is created by summing the items for all three subscales (score range 0-96). Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations.
0 weeks
Change in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)
The WOMAC evaluation will be performed on patients who received the treatment at 0, 6, 12, 24 weeks after treatment is finished. The WOMAC measures five items for pain (score range 0-20), two for stiffness (score range 0-8), and 17 for functional limitation (score range 0-68). A total WOMAC score is created by summing the items for all three subscales (score range 0-96). Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations.
6 weeks
Change in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)
The WOMAC evaluation will be performed on patients who received the treatment at 0, 6, 12, 24 weeks after treatment is finished. The WOMAC measures five items for pain (score range 0-20), two for stiffness (score range 0-8), and 17 for functional limitation (score range 0-68). A total WOMAC score is created by summing the items for all three subscales (score range 0-96). Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations.
12 weeks
Change in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)
The WOMAC evaluation will be performed on patients who received the treatment at 0, 6, 12, 24 weeks after treatment is finished. The WOMAC measures five items for pain (score range 0-20), two for stiffness (score range 0-8), and 17 for functional limitation (score range 0-68). A total WOMAC score is created by summing the items for all three subscales (score range 0-96). Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations.
24 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
0-24 weeks
Other Outcomes (4)
Change in SF-12v2 Health Survey
0 weeks
Change in SF-12v2 Health Survey
6 weeks
Change in SF-12v2 Health Survey
12 weeks
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Acetaminophen
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients from this arm will receive a dosis of acetaminophen (500 mg/8 hours) while PRP treatment lasts.
Intra-articular injection of PRP
EXPERIMENTALPatients from this arm will receive 3 intra-articular knee injections of autologous platelet-rich plasma, one injection every two weeks
Interventions
Patients from this arm will receive 3 intra-articular knee injections of autologous platelet-rich plasma, one injection every two weeks (6 weeks total).
Patients from this arm will receive a dosis of acetaminophen (500 mg/8 hours) while PRP treatment lasts (6 weeks total).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Older than 18 years old
- Patients who haven't received steroids injection or medical treatment 1 month before the study
- Patients with knee osteoarthritis grade I and II (Kellgren-Lawrence scale)
- Indistinct gender
- Patients who accept to participate in the study with previous signed informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with knee osteoarthritis grade III and IV (Kellgren-Lawrence scale)
- Patients with prosthesis
- Pregnancy
- Patients with rheumatic diseases
- Patients with diabetes, hepatic diseases, coagulopathy, cardiovascular diseases, immunosuppression, infections
- Patients taking anticoagulants
- Patients with concentrations of hemoglobin under 11 g/dL and platelets under 150,000/uL
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Universitario Dr. José E. González
Monterrey, Nuevo León, 64460, Mexico
Related Publications (3)
Spakova T, Rosocha J, Lacko M, Harvanova D, Gharaibeh A. Treatment of knee joint osteoarthritis with autologous platelet-rich plasma in comparison with hyaluronic acid. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 May;91(5):411-7. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3182aab72.
PMID: 22513879BACKGROUNDFilardo G, Kon E, Pereira Ruiz MT, Vaccaro F, Guitaldi R, Di Martino A, Cenacchi A, Fornasari PM, Marcacci M. Platelet-rich plasma intra-articular injections for cartilage degeneration and osteoarthritis: single- versus double-spinning approach. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Oct;20(10):2082-91. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1837-x. Epub 2011 Dec 28.
PMID: 22203046BACKGROUNDvan Buul GM, Koevoet WL, Kops N, Bos PK, Verhaar JA, Weinans H, Bernsen MR, van Osch GJ. Platelet-rich plasma releasate inhibits inflammatory processes in osteoarthritic chondrocytes. Am J Sports Med. 2011 Nov;39(11):2362-70. doi: 10.1177/0363546511419278. Epub 2011 Aug 19.
PMID: 21856929BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- M Sc Mario Simental-Mendía
- Organization
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mario A. Simental, MSc
Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Facultad de Medicina
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Felix Vilchez, PhD
Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Hospital Universitario Dr. José E. González
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Herminia G Martínez, PhD
Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Facultad de Medicina
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- M. Sc.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 30, 2013
First Posted
February 4, 2013
Study Start
May 1, 2013
Primary Completion
August 1, 2015
Study Completion
August 1, 2015
Last Updated
November 20, 2015
Results First Posted
November 20, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-10