NCT01771536

Brief Summary

Despite several large clinical trials clearly establishing that coronary revascularization (i.e. percutaneous coronary intervention - PCI) does not prolong survival or prevent myocardial infarction (MI) for stable coronary artery disease (CAD), patients with stable angina continue to believe that PCI is performed to improve these outcomes. Additionally, recent concerns have emerged of overuse of PCI among patients with little or no angina. Thus there is a compelling need to share with patients the risks and benefits of PCI prior to treatment to reach an informed decision. This study is designed to answer the question of whether a decision aid can improve patient knowledge, decisional conflict and patient satisfaction with decision-making compared to usual care for the treatment of stable angina.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
132

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2012

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2012

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 15, 2012

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 18, 2013

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2014

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

March 15, 2023

Status Verified

March 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

December 15, 2012

Last Update Submit

March 13, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Efficacy of the PCI Choice Decision aid vs. Usual Care assessed by Patient and Provider Surveys, and encounter Video/Audio Recordings

    Efficacy in improving measures of patient knowledge and involvement, decision making quality, treatment choice and clinician satisfaction of the decision aid.

    Baseline to Three Months

Study Arms (2)

PCI Choice decision

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Decision Aid intervention is provided to clinician to share with patient

Other: Decision Aid

Usual Care

NO INTERVENTION

Interventions

PCI Choice decision

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosis of stable angina - As judge by clinician, eligible for medication therapy or PCI - agree to be available for follow-up survey 3 months after treatment decision

You may not qualify if:

  • has major communication barrier (severe hearing/vision impairment, dementia, cannot communicate with clinician in English)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Mayo Clinic

Rochester, Minnesota, 55901, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Coylewright M, Dick S, Zmolek B, Askelin J, Hawkins E, Branda M, Inselman JW, Zeballos-Palacios C, Shah ND, Hess EP, LeBlanc A, Montori VM, Ting HH. PCI Choice Decision Aid for Stable Coronary Artery Disease: A Randomized Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016 Nov;9(6):767-776. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.002641. Epub 2016 Nov 1.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Angina, Stable

Interventions

Decision Support Techniques

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Angina PectorisMyocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesVascular DiseasesChest PainPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Investigative Techniques

Study Officials

  • Nilay Shah, PhD

    Mayo Clinic

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 15, 2012

First Posted

January 18, 2013

Study Start

November 1, 2012

Primary Completion

March 1, 2014

Study Completion

June 1, 2014

Last Updated

March 15, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-03

Locations