NCT01771068

Brief Summary

The present study aims to examine the effectiveness of a parenting intervention, the Triple P Positive Parenting Program Level 3 discussion groups "dealing with disobedience". Triple P is a system of interventions to support families and was developed at the University of Queensland in Australia in the 1980's. As few studies have tested the effectiveness of parenting programs in developing countries, the present study took place in a developing country, Panama. In a recent study carried out in Australia, this same intervention was found effective in reducing child behaviour problems and the use of dysfunctional parenting (Morawska, Haslam, Milne \& Sanders, 2011).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
108

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2012

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2012

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2012

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 11, 2013

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 18, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

January 18, 2013

Status Verified

January 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

January 11, 2013

Last Update Submit

January 17, 2013

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in Eyberg Child Behaviour Inventory (ECBI)

    baseline, 2 weeks post intervention, 3 months and 6 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Change in Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 21 (DASS 21)

    baseline, 2 weeks post intervention, 3 months and 6 months

  • Change in Parenting Scale (PS)

    baseline, 2 weeks post intervention, 3 months and 6 months

  • Change in Parenting Task Checklist (PTC)

    baseline, 2 weeks post intervention, 3 months and 6 months

Study Arms (2)

Waiting list

NO INTERVENTION

Parenting Discussion Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Two-hour discussion group on child noncompliance. Groups were composed by a maximum of 10 parents and were facilitated by the principal researcher, who is an accredited practitioner. The groups were interactive and discussion based, and a power point presentation with embedded-video clips was used to aid the facilitator. The key points covered in the discussion group included reasons for disobedience, parenting traps, encouraging good behaviour, and managing disobedience. Parents also received a workbook that included the content covered in the discussion group and 2 follow up telephone calls to check how they were doing after the discussion groups.

Behavioral: Triple P Positive Parenting Program Discussion Group "Dealing with Disobedience"

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Participants must be Panamanian
  • must have at least one child between 3 and 12 years old
  • must report some level of difficulty in dealing with their child behaviour.

You may not qualify if:

  • no report of difficulty in dealing with child behaviour
  • illiteracy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ministry of Education, District of Panama

Panama City, Provincia de Panamá, Panama

Location

Study Officials

  • Anilena Mejia, MSc

    The University of Manchester

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Rachel Calam, Professor

    The University of Manchester

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Matthew Sanders, Professor

    The University of Queensland

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PhD Student

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 11, 2013

First Posted

January 18, 2013

Study Start

April 1, 2012

Primary Completion

December 1, 2012

Study Completion

December 1, 2012

Last Updated

January 18, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-01

Locations