Neurotoxicity Characterization Study of Nab-paclitaxel Versus Conventional Paclitaxel in Metastatic Breast Cancer
neurabrax
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
10
Brief Summary
Nanomedicines are currently being developed in the treatment of cancer due to their pharmacological advantages over traditional formulations; they provide a shorter infusion time and lower risks of hypersensitivity reactions associated with commonly used solvents. Nab-paclitaxel is a nanoparticle albumin-bound particle form of paclitaxel that is thought to exploit natural albumin pathways to enhance the selective uptake and accumulation of paclitaxel at the site of the tumour, thus reducing its diffusion to normal tissues. Nab-paclitaxel has been approved for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer patients who have failed first-line treatment for metastatic disease and for whom standard, anthracycline-containing therapy is not indicated. SPARC is a cysteine rich acid protein that is overexpressed in a broad proportion of solid tumours. Expression of this protein could sensitize tumour cells to antitumor activity of Nab-paclitaxel, due to its union through albumin-binding to this protein. First-line clinical trials have been developed with different Nab-paclitaxel regimens and also in combination with different chemotherapies and trastuzumab, showing a high level of efficacy. Toxicity profile of Nab-paclitaxel is well characterized with significantly less haematological toxicities compared with conventional paclitaxel. Nab-paclitaxel derived grade III neuropathy is short-lasting and more reversible than conventional paclitaxel-derived neuropathy, probably due to absence of Cremophor solvent, or due to paclitaxel itself. However there is still a lack of clinical and physiological characterisation of Nab-paclitaxel induced neuropathy. The current used tools for early detection and continuous evaluation of neurotoxicity are not optimal. Most used toxicity scales are limited, as they do not provide a detailed information of the severity of the neuropathy, its impact on quality of life, or physiopathology mechanisms. In addition, an inter-individual variability exists in terms of neurotoxicity predisposition when taxanes are used; it could be related to polymorphic differences in genes implicated in transport and metabolism of these drugs.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2 breast-cancer
Started Dec 2012
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 14, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 9, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2015
CompletedMarch 29, 2016
March 1, 2016
3 years
December 14, 2012
March 28, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
TNS - Total Neuropathy Score
Every 3 months up to 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Evaluate the incidence of neuropathy induced by study treatment (conventional paclitaxel vs nab-paclitaxel)
Every 3 weeks up to 24 weeks
Evaluate the electromyographic abnormalities and the correlation of these alterations with the assessment of the TNS scale and NCI-CTCAE (Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects) v4.0
Every 12 weeks up to 24 weeks
Determine the predictive value of genetic variants (SNPs) for the development of neuropathy
In the two weeks before start treatment
Determine the clinical activity of both treatments (response rate, time to progression)
Every 8-12 weeks up to 24 weeks
Determine toxicity profile and safety of study treatments (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Every 2 weeks up to 24 weeks
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Arm A
ACTIVE COMPARATORPaclitaxel 80 mg/m2 days 1, 8 and 15
Arm B
EXPERIMENTALNab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 days 1, 8 and 15
Arm C
EXPERIMENTALNab-paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 days 1, 8 and 15
Arm D
EXPERIMENTALNab-paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 days 1 and 15
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women with histologically or cytologically of stage IV breast cancer.
- Non-candidate patient to trastuzumab or lapatinib treatment as not presenting HER2 oncogene amplification.
- Metastatic disease not previously treated with chemotherapy. It is allowed pre-treatment hormone with anti-target or bisphosphonates for advanced disease.
- Measurable or evaluable disease by RECIST criteria.
- Previous sensory neuropathy \<= grade 1, according to NCI-CTCAE criteria, due to any reason.
- Age\> 18 years.
- Performance status \<2 (ECOG).
- At least 12 months after the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy with taxanes to diagnosis of metastatic disease.
- Creatinine \<= 1.5mg/dL, AST (SGOT), ALT (SGPT) and alkaline phosphatase \<= 2.5 x ULN (hepatic metastases absent) in the 14 days prior to study entry.
- Hemoglobin\> 10g/dl, WBC\> 3000/mm3, platelets\> 100000/mm3 and bilirubin \<1.5 mg / dL in the 14 days prior to study entry.
- Women of childbearing potential with negative pregnancy test within 14 days prior to study treatment.
- Patients using adequate contraception throughout the entire duration of the study and until 4 weeks after completion of treatment.
- At least 4 weeks after radiotherapy or major surgery, with complete recovery.
- Life expectancy greater than 12 weeks.
- Patients who are able to meet the requirements of the protocol.
- +2 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Prior chemotherapy treatment for metastatic disease.
- Brain metastases.
- Any concomitant medical or psychiatric illness including active infection.
- History of any malignancy other than breast cancer in the past 5 years except carcinoma or basal cell skin carcinoma or carcinoma in situ of cervix.
- Prior treatment with an investigational drug within the last 2 weeks.
- Known hypersensitivity to paclitaxel or Cremophor.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (10)
Hospital Universitario Del Sureste
Arganda, Madrid, 28500, Spain
Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada
Fuenlabrada, Madrid, 28942, Spain
Hospital Universitario de Getafe
Getafe, Madrid, 28905, Spain
Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa
Leganés, Madrid, 28911, Spain
Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor
Madrid, Madrid, 28031, Spain
Hospital Ramón Y Cajal
Madrid, Madrid, 28034, Spain
Hospital Clínico San Carlos
Madrid, Madrid, 28040, Spain
Hospital 12 de Octubre
Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda
Majadahonda, Madrid, 28222, Spain
Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina
Parla, Madrid, 28981, Spain
Related Publications (1)
Ciruelos E, Apellaniz-Ruiz M, Cantos B, Martinez-Janez N, Bueno-Muino C, Echarri MJ, Enrech S, Guerra JA, Manso L, Pascual T, Dominguez C, Gonzalo JF, Sanz JL, Rodriguez-Antona C, Sepulveda JM. A Pilot, Phase II, Randomized, Open-Label Clinical Trial Comparing the Neurotoxicity of Three Dose Regimens of Nab-Paclitaxel to That of Solvent-Based Paclitaxel as the First-Line Treatment for Patients with Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Type 2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer. Oncologist. 2019 Nov;24(11):e1024-e1033. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0664. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
PMID: 31023863DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Eva Ciruelos, MD
Hospital 12 de Octubre, Servicio de Oncología Médica
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Noelia Martínez, MD
Hoapital Ramón y Cajal, Servicio de Oncología Médica
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rafael Carrión, MD
Hospital Universitario del Sureste, Servicio de Oncología Médica
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
José A García Sáenz, MD
Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Servicio de Oncología Médica
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
María Echarri, Md
Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa, Servicio de Oncología Médica
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Blanca Cantos, MD
Hospital Universitario Puerta de hierro Majadahonda, Servicio de Oncología Médica
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Coralía Bueno, MD
Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Servicio de Oncología Médica
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Miguel A Lara, MD
Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Santos Enrech, MD
Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Servicio de Oncología Médica
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Juan A Guerra, MD
Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 14, 2012
First Posted
January 9, 2013
Study Start
December 1, 2012
Primary Completion
December 1, 2015
Study Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
March 29, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-03