NCT01752673

Brief Summary

Medical reasoning is a form of inquiry that examines the thought processes involved in making medical decisions. When physicians are faced with patients' symptoms or signs, their thought processes follow either direct shortcuts to suspect a diagnosis or go into a deeper and more analytic process to reach a diagnosis. The second pathway is less prone to biases and errors. This study explores whether the use of an interactive visual display of probabilities of pulmonary embolism generated from positive or negative test results will increase the adherence to evidence based guidelines in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2011

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2011

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2011

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2011

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 12, 2012

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 19, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

December 19, 2012

Status Verified

December 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

December 12, 2012

Last Update Submit

December 14, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

randomized controlled study

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Concordance with medical diagnostic reasoning pathway for pulmonary embolism.

    Concordance with medical diagnostic reasoning pathway for a case presentation suggestive of pulmonary embolism will be reflected by whether participants are stopping prematurely or proceeding with diagnostic steps inappropriately.

    Paper-based clinical case scenarios were completed within 2 hour after either intervention.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Time.

    Paper-based clinical case scenarios were completed within 2 hour after either intervention.

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Survey.

    Survey was completed within 2 hours after completion of either intervention.

Study Arms (2)

Visualized pulmonary embolism computer task model

EXPERIMENTAL

This group of participants was presented and trained to use a visual representation of diagnostic pathway for pulmonary embolism. The design of this visual representation is based on Bayes theorem and cognition enhancing visual design principles.

Other: Visualized pulmonary embolism computer task model

Didactic review pulmonary embolism lecture

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

This group of participants was presented with a didactic lecture covering the diagnostic approach of pulmonary embolism.

Other: Didactic review lecture

Interventions

This group of participants was presented and trained to use a visual representation of diagnostic pathway for pulmonary embolism. The design of this visual representation is based on Bayes theorem and cognition enhancing visual design principles.

Visualized pulmonary embolism computer task model

This group of participants was presented with a didactic lecture covering the diagnostic approach of pulmonary embolism.

Didactic review pulmonary embolism lecture

Eligibility Criteria

Age24 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Medical students, University of Calgary, in clerkship who finished at least 4 weeks of a block of medicine rotation at any hospital site.
  • First year subspecialty or Internal Medicine residents.
  • Practicing physicians in the subspecialties of Internal Medicine or Emergency Medicine.

You may not qualify if:

  • Physicians in the subspecialty of Haematology or Respiratory

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Calgary

Calgary, Alberta, T2V1P9, Canada

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Embolism

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesEmbolismEmbolism and ThrombosisVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Ghazwan Altabbaa, MD MSc

    University of Calgary

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Doctor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 12, 2012

First Posted

December 19, 2012

Study Start

March 1, 2011

Primary Completion

October 1, 2011

Study Completion

October 1, 2011

Last Updated

December 19, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-12

Locations