A Prospective Randomized Trial of Prostate Biopsy Protocols Comparing the Vienna Nomogram and a Standard 10-core Biopsy Scheme
1 other identifier
interventional
463
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this study, the investigators aim to determine if the Vienna nomogram increases the detection rate of TRUS-guided prostate biopsies by conducting a prospective randomized study comparing the Vienna nomogram with a 10-core biopsy protocol.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable prostate-cancer
Started Jan 2009
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable prostate-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 13, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 19, 2012
CompletedDecember 19, 2012
December 1, 2012
1.5 years
December 13, 2012
December 15, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Prostate cancer detection rate
Up to four weeks after intervention
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Prostate cancer detection rate in prostate volume and age subclasses
Up to four weeks after intervention
Gleason score concordance between biopsy and prostatectomy specimens
Up to four weeks after prostatectomy
Study Arms (2)
10-core prostate biopsy protocol group
ACTIVE COMPARATORUltrasound guided prostate biopsy with extraction of 10 cores
Vienna nomogram prostate biopsy protocol group
ACTIVE COMPARATORUltrasound guided prostate biopsy performed according to the Vienna nomogram
Interventions
Local vascular bundle anesthesia with 2% lidocaine was performed using a 22G Chiba needle. Ultrasound guided prostate biopsy using a standard biopsy device to obtain 10 biopsy cores.
Local vascular bundle anesthesia with 2% lidocaine was performed using a 22G Chiba needle. Ultrasound guided prostate biopsy using a standard biopsy device to obtain a number of cores as defined by the Vienna nomogram.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- PSA elevation
- Abnormal digital rectal examination
- Abnormal findings on prostate imaging
You may not qualify if:
- Active urinary tract infection
- Documented previous pathological prostatitis
- History of urinary retention
- Recent lower urinary tract surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Urology Department - Hospital de Santa Maria
Lisbon, Lisbon District, 1649-035, Portugal
Related Publications (4)
Uzzo RG, Wei JT, Waldbaum RS, Perlmutter AP, Byrne JC, Vaughan ED Jr. The influence of prostate size on cancer detection. Urology. 1995 Dec;46(6):831-6. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)80353-7.
PMID: 7502425BACKGROUNDDjavan B, Margreiter M. Biopsy standards for detection of prostate cancer. World J Urol. 2007 Mar;25(1):11-7. doi: 10.1007/s00345-007-0151-1. Epub 2007 Mar 7.
PMID: 17342490BACKGROUNDLecuona A, Heyns CF. A prospective, randomized trial comparing the Vienna nomogram to an eight-core prostate biopsy protocol. BJU Int. 2011 Jul;108(2):204-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09887.x. Epub 2010 Nov 19.
PMID: 21087452BACKGROUNDRemzi M, Fong YK, Dobrovits M, Anagnostou T, Seitz C, Waldert M, Harik M, Marihart S, Marberger M, Djavan B. The Vienna nomogram: validation of a novel biopsy strategy defining the optimal number of cores based on patient age and total prostate volume. J Urol. 2005 Oct;174(4 Pt 1):1256-60; discussion 1260-1; author reply 1261. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000173924.83392.cc.
PMID: 16145388BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tito P Leitão, Dr.
Hospital de Santa Maria
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 13, 2012
First Posted
December 19, 2012
Study Start
January 1, 2009
Primary Completion
July 1, 2010
Study Completion
July 1, 2010
Last Updated
December 19, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-12