Study Stopped
The study was terminated by the Sponsor due to insufficient enrollment.
AC105 in Patients With Acute Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury
AC105
A Phase 2 Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study to Determine the Safety, Tolerability and Potential Activity of AC105 Following a Regimen of 6 Doses Over 30 Hours in Patients With Acute Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury (SCI).
1 other identifier
interventional
15
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The principal aim of this study was to establish the feasibility of rapid administration, safety, and tolerability of AC105 in patients with acute spinal cord injury.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started Jul 2013
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 13, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 17, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 13, 2016
CompletedNovember 6, 2018
October 1, 2018
1.6 years
December 13, 2012
May 6, 2016
October 9, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Treatment-related Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v4.0
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are defined as AEs with date time of onset (or worsening) on or after the start date time of the first infusion and no more than 30 days after the end of the last infusion.
up to 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters of AC105 Using Individual Patient Plasma Concentration-time Data
baseline, prior to and up to 5 hours following last infusion
Study Arms (2)
Saline
PLACEBO COMPARATORPatients randomized (1:1) to the placebo arm will receive an initial intravenous infusion of saline for 30 minutes within a pre-specified time window (12, 9, 6 hours post-injury). Patients will receive 5 additional infusions of the same dose and duration at 6 -hour intervals.
AC105
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients randomized (1:1) to the active drug arm will receive an initial intravenous infusion of AC105 for 30 minutes within a pre-specified time window (12, 9, 6 hours post-injury). Patients will receive 5 additional infusions of the same dose and duration at 6 -hour intervals.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female between 18 and 65 years of age, inclusive
- Acute traumatic SCI, at a neurological level between C4 and T11
- No evidence of penetrating or transection injury (e.g. caused by projectile or stab wound)
- Neurological ASIA Impairment Scale A, B or C
- Patient is able to provide written or verbal witnessed consent. If unable to provide either, consent may be provided by legally authorized representative (LAR)
- Patient is able to initiate treatment within time window of injury
You may not qualify if:
- Known allergy or hypersensitivity to polyethylene glycol
- Mental impairment or other conditions that would preclude a reliable ASIA exam or adequate consent
- Positive urine pregnancy test result
- Serum creatinine level ≥ 2 mg/dL
- History or active renal failure or dialysis
- Mean arterial blood pressure \< 60 mmHg despite vasopressor treatment
- On a current regimen of digoxin
- Chronic use of magnesium salts prior to the SCI (within 1week of presentation) and/or the use of magnesium salts in the acute care setting prior to the administration of investigational product
- Any other medical condition that, in the judgment of the investigator, would preclude provision of informed consent, make participation in the study unsafe, or unreasonably complicate follow-up or the interpretation of study outcome data or may otherwise interfere with achieving the study objectives
- In the judgment of the Investigator, cannot adequately provide informed consent, is likely to be non-compliant, or may be unable to cooperate with study requirements
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Acorda Therapeuticslead
- United States Department of Defensecollaborator
- DP Clinical, Inc.collaborator
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Chief Scientific Officer
- Organization
- Acorda Therapeutics, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Andrew Eisen, MD
Acorda Therapeutics
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 13, 2012
First Posted
December 17, 2012
Study Start
July 1, 2013
Primary Completion
February 1, 2015
Study Completion
May 1, 2015
Last Updated
November 6, 2018
Results First Posted
June 13, 2016
Record last verified: 2018-10