Users Study Of The Caverject Delivery System
A Representative Users Study Of The Operating Characteristics Of The Caverject Delivery System
1 other identifier
interventional
48
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Usability testing of the dual-chambered syringe in conjunction with the proposed patient instructions for use.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for early_phase_1 healthy
Started Mar 2013
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 20, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 12, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 2, 2014
CompletedMay 2, 2014
April 1, 2014
Same day
November 20, 2012
April 1, 2014
April 1, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Delivery System Success Rate (DSSR)
DSSR was defined as percentage of participants who were able to successfully expel the selected dose from the Caverject Impulse Dual Chamber Delivery System when relying on the modified Instructions for Use (IFU). The process was considered successful if the attempt was observed and documented by study personnel AND the participant didn't receive any operational/"hands on" demonstration on how to operate the plunger from study personnel AND after performing all preparatory steps, the participant was able to expel the dose to the selected plunger stop-point without any unexpected interruption.
Day 1
Secondary Outcomes (22)
Number of Participants With Categorical Responses to the Participant Assessment Tool (PAT): Instructions Provided Were Useful?
Day 1
Number of Participants With Categorical Responses to the PAT: Instructions Provided Were Clear?
Day 1
Number of Participants With Categorical Responses to the PAT: Most Difficult Step?
Day 1
Number of Participants With Categorical Responses to the PAT: Syringe Easy to Use?
Day 1
Number of Participants Providing Responses to Any Question on the PAT
Day 1
- +17 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Group 1
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy males
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to read English;
- physical limitations preventing participant from operating the syringe
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Pfizerlead
Study Sites (1)
Vince and Associates Clinical Research
Overland Park, Kansas, 66212, United States
Related Links
Limitations and Caveats
For outcome measure 7, the endpoint was originally the comments provided as part of the PAT. As clinicaltrials.gov do not support textual results, the number of participants who provided comments to any questions on the PAT are reported instead.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center
- Organization
- Pfizer, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Pfizer
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- early phase 1
- Masking
- NONE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 20, 2012
First Posted
December 12, 2012
Study Start
March 1, 2013
Primary Completion
March 1, 2013
Study Completion
March 1, 2013
Last Updated
May 2, 2014
Results First Posted
May 2, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-04