Effects of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Object Recognition
Modulating Behavior in Humans by Entrainment With Rhythmic Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
2 other identifiers
interventional
13
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: \- The brain has natural rhythms called brain waves. An electroencephalogram (EEG) can record these rhythms. When people identify the picture of a familiar object shown on a computer screen, the communication between certain regions of the brain increases. An EEG can detect these communication brain waves. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can affect these brain waves by slightly changing the brain s rhythms. Researchers want to see if changing brain rhythms with TMS interferes with the ability to identify pictures of familiar objects. This study will provide more information about how TMS can affect brain waves and behavior. Objectives: \- To see if TMS can interfere with the brain s ability to identify pictures of familiar objects. Eligibility: \- Healthy volunteers between 18 and 70 years of age. Design:
- This study requires two visits to the clinical center. The first visit will last about 2 hours. The second visit will last about 4 hours.
- Participants will be screened with a physical exam and medical history.
- At the first visit, participants will have an object recognition test. Participants will look at pictures of several objects on a computer screen. They will then have to state whether the objects they see on the screen are familiar. The object recognition test will be done along with TMS.
- At the second visit, participants will have an EEG while taking the object recognition test. Brain waves will be monitored during the test. They will then repeat the test while having repetitive TMS to study its effect on object recognition. The participants will then take the object recognition test alone for a final time. This will make sure that TMS effects (if any) on the ability to identify familiar object images are no longer present.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 16, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 8, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 11, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 26, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 26, 2017
CompletedJuly 2, 2017
January 26, 2017
4.2 years
December 8, 2012
June 30, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of correct responses in the midline object recognition task.
4 hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Threshold intensity for blocking object recognition
4 hours
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age between 18 - 70 years.
- Able to give his/her own consent to participate in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of cardiac pacemaker, brain stimulator, shrapnel, surgical metal, clips in the brain, cochlear implants, metal fragments in the eye.
- Pregnancy or lactation.
- History of any serious medical illness or hearing problems
- Intake of medication that affect the central nervous system like anti depressants, antihistamines, antipsychotics, dopamine agonists, benzodiazepines and antiepileptics in the past 3 months.
- Presence of neurological or psychiatric illnesses like brain tumor, migraine, depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia.
- History of any seizure.
- Use or abuse of any drug in the past 6 months or intake of more than 7 alcoholic drinks a week in females and more than 14 alcoholic drinks a week in males.
- Presence of metal in the body, such as a cardiac pacemaker, brain stimulator, shrapnel, surgical metal, clips in the brain or on blood vessels, cochlear implants, artificial heart valves or metal fragments in the eye as these make having an MRI unsafe.
- Presence of metallic dental fillings which are likely to cause MRI artifacts
- Uncomfortable being in a small space for up to 2 hours.
- Unable to lie flat on the back for up to 2 hours
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike
Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, United States
Related Publications (3)
Adler G, Brassen S, Jajcevic A. EEG coherence in Alzheimer's dementia. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2003 Sep;110(9):1051-8. doi: 10.1007/s00702-003-0024-8.
PMID: 12928837BACKGROUNDGerloff C, Andres FG. Bimanual coordination and interhemispheric interaction. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2002 Jun;110(2-3):161-86. doi: 10.1016/s0001-6918(02)00032-x.
PMID: 12102104BACKGROUNDGray CM, Singer W. Stimulus-specific neuronal oscillations in orientation columns of cat visual cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Mar;86(5):1698-702. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.5.1698.
PMID: 2922407BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mark Hallett, M.D.
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- NIH
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 8, 2012
First Posted
December 11, 2012
Study Start
November 16, 2012
Primary Completion
January 26, 2017
Study Completion
January 26, 2017
Last Updated
July 2, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-01-26