CTOP/ITE/MTX Compared With CHOP as the First-line Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Young Patients With T Cell Lymphoma
An Open-label,Multicenter Randomised Study of CTOP/ITE/MTX Compared With CHOP as the First-line Therapy for the New Diagnosed Young Patients With T Cell Non-hodgkin Lymphoma
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
T cell lymphoma is a heterogenic malignancy with poor outcome. Five-year PFS and OS of the patients recieved classic CHOP regimen(cyclophosphamide,vincristin,doxorubicin and predisone)is less than 30%.High dose intensive chemotherapy doesn't demonstrate better response. At present, there is no standardized treatment protocol for this kind of lymphoma. Between 1994 and 1998,the Scotland and Newcastle Lymphoma Group prospectively collected data on newly diagnosed patients with enteropathy associated T-cell lymphoma (EATL)in the Northern Region of England and Scotland,which is a rare and aggressive type of peripheral T-cell lymphoma.The novel regimen IVE/MTX (ifosfamide, vincristine, etoposide/methotrexate)-ASCT was piloted for patients eligible for intensive treatment,followed by auto-stem cell transplantation.Five-years PFS and OS were 52% and 60% respectively, significantly improved compared with the historical group treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy. The encouraged results were extended to the peripherial T cell lymphoma-non specified(PTCL-nos). Past studies suggested pirarubicin was more active to the T cell lymphoma than doxorubicin in vitro based on its high concentration in tumor cells. Clinical data also presented equivalent even superior efficacy of pirarubicin with lower toxicity than doxorubicin. The aim of our study is to compare the response and survival rate of CTOP/ITE/MTX (cyclophosphamide, vincristin,pirarubicin and predisone/ ifosfamide, pirarubicin, etoposide/methotrexate) with those of CHOP regimen,looking forward to its superiority in efficacy and safety for the de novo young patients with T cell lymphoma.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Sep 2012
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 4, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 11, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2018
CompletedNovember 14, 2017
November 1, 2017
6 years
December 4, 2012
November 10, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
complete remission rate
6 months
3-year PFS
3 years
Secondary Outcomes (2)
overall response rate
6 months
3-year os
3 years
Study Arms (2)
pirarubicin
EXPERIMENTAL3 cycles of CTOP(cyclophosphamide,vincristin,pirarubicin and prednisone),3 cycles of ITE(ifosfamide, pirarubicin, etoposide)and 2 cycles of methotrexate
doxorubicin
ACTIVE COMPARATOR8 cycles of CHOP regimen(cyclophosphamide,vincristin,doxorubicin and prednisone)
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- pathologic verified mature T cell lymphoma,including ALK-negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma,peripherial T cell lymphoma-non specific type,angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma,enteropathy associated T cell lymphoma and hepatosplenic T cell lymphoma
- SGOT/SGPT no more than 2 times of UNL
- serum creatinine no more than 1.5 times of UNL
- signed informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- woman in pregnancy or lactation
- allergic to any intervention drug
- insuitable to the study due to severe complication
- enrolled to other study during the past 6 months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ruijin Hospitallead
Study Sites (1)
Ruijin hospital
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200025, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- vice director of Department of Hematology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 4, 2012
First Posted
December 11, 2012
Study Start
September 1, 2012
Primary Completion
September 1, 2018
Study Completion
December 1, 2018
Last Updated
November 14, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-11