Study Stopped
Resource issues, Poor recruitment
A Single-centre Study of Entonox Versus Midazolam Sedation in Gastroscopy
A Single-centre, Randomised Controlled Study of Entonox Versus Midazolam Sedation in Gastroscopy.
1 other identifier
interventional
62
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to determine whether Entonox (gas and air) is at least as good as intravenous midazolam in providing analgesia and sedation during gastroscopy. Entonox is used as an adjunct in lower gastrointestinal procedures but is not routinely used in gastroscopy, and there is only one similar published study to date, which was performed in children. The main advantage of Entonox over midazolam is the quick recovery time following withdrawal of the agent, which enables patients to return to independent normal life. The investigators would like to be able to offer Entonox to patients as an option for sedation during gastroscopy, this study is being conducted to determine if it is a safe and feasible option.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started May 2013
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 4, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 6, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 12, 2024
CompletedNovember 12, 2024
September 1, 2024
8.8 years
December 4, 2012
March 6, 2024
September 5, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Patients Mild or no Discomfort During Gastroscopy
Percentage of patients with a score of 4 or 5 on the 5-point modified global rating scale comfort score, as measured by the patient, will be compared between the midazolam and entonox groups, per protocol. The comfort score ranges from 1-5 with 1 meaning patient was in extreme discomfort frequently during procedure and 5 being no discomfort, resting comfortably throughout. The score is completed by the patient while they are in the recovery area post procedure and prior to discharge from the unit.
During gastroscopy procedure
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Number of Participants With Completed Procedures in Both Arms of the Study.
Day of procedure
Comparison of Procedure Time
Defined as start time to end time of gastroscopy.
Comparison of Procedure Start Time to Discharge.
Procedure to discharge
Number of Patients With Adverse Events.
Consent to 72 hours post discharge from the endoscopy unit which is the same day as the procedure.
Comparison of Visual Analogue Scale Scores.
Completed after procedure completion during the post-procedure care and prior to discharge from the endoscopy unit.
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Midazolam
ACTIVE COMPARATORmidazolam sedation combined with pharyngeal anaesthesia Participants randomized to receive midazolam will have an intravenous cannula sited and, following the administration of xylocaine throat spray as above, will be put into the left lateral position. They will then be given up to 5mg midazolam as appropriate to achieve conscious sedation as for standard protocol in endoscopy.
Entonox
EXPERIMENTALEntonox combined with pharyngeal anaesthesia. Pharyngeal anaesthesia, given as 8-16 sprays of xylocaine to the pharynx; 3 minutes will be given to allow the pharynx to become anaesthetized. Participants randomized to receive Entonox will be given the 50:50 nitrous oxide:oxygen mix via a mouthpiece with a demand valve system, once in position for the procedure. Inhalations will be given for 3-5 minutes (or until the participant feels adequately sedated) measured using a stopwatch. Oxygen will be given at 2 litres per minute via nasal cannulae during the procedure, (standard care for sedated procedures). The endoscopist will then proceed to intubate the cricopharynx and perform the procedure in the standard manner.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male/female aged 18 years or over
- Confirmed clinical requirement to undergo diagnostic gastroscopy
- Suitable for sedation
- Able to provide informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- History of chronic respiratory or significant cardiac disease
- Requirement for longer procedure eg Barrett's surveillance
- Previous known adverse reaction to Entonox
- Entonox use in previous 4 days
- Known current vitamin B12 or folate deficiency
- Unable to provide consent
- Any known contraindication to Entonox:
- Gas trapped in a part of the body where its expansion may be dangerous, such as air lodged in an artery or artificial traumatic or spontaneous pneumothorax (collapsed lung).
- Decompression sickness (the bends) or following a recent dive
- Air encephalography
- Severe bullous emphysema
- Myringoplasty
- Gross abdominal distension
- Recent severe injuries to the face and jaw
- Current or recent head injuries
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Bournemouth, Dorset, BH7 7DW, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr Simon McLaughlin
- Organization
- University Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Simon McLaughlin, MD
The Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 4, 2012
First Posted
December 6, 2012
Study Start
May 1, 2013
Primary Completion
February 28, 2022
Study Completion
February 28, 2022
Last Updated
November 12, 2024
Results First Posted
November 12, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-09