Efficacy and Safety of Propranolol Versus Acebutolol on the Proliferative Phase of Infantile Hemangioma
1 other identifier
interventional
55
1 country
4
Brief Summary
There is no effective treatment for hemangioma regardless of immediate severity. That is in this respect a orphan disease. These hemangiomas, sometimes large, will have a phase of proliferation of several months (very scary for parents) and regression over several years. The natural history is peppered with local complications (ulcers) and aesthetic and psychological sequelae (sometimes major for the child and the family). The effects of acebutolol and propranolol on the proliferative hemangiomas were discovered accidentally by two French teams (Montpellier for acebutolol and Bordeaux for propranolol). Acebutolol and propranolol have been used for many years for the treatment of hypertension and congenital heart disease, including infants, with few side effects. The effects of acebutolol and propranolol were immediately visible with reduced volume and skin whitening of the hemangioma. In a preliminary study, acebutolol was administered to 20 patients in Montpellier with big regression of hemangiomas. The aim of the study was to compare the clinical efficacy of acebutolol (10mg/Kg/jour) and propranolol (3mg/Kg/j) on the proliferative phase of infantile hemangioma in infants.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Nov 2012
Typical duration for phase_3
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 28, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 6, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2015
CompletedJune 1, 2016
May 1, 2016
2.6 years
November 28, 2012
May 31, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Hemangioma size
It will be evaluated using a VAS (visual analogue scale) on a series of photos at Day 0, Day 30 and Day 90
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Tolerance of treatment
3 months
Proportion of patients requiring treatment with corticosteroids because of the evolution of a 'serious' hemangioma
3 months
Study Arms (2)
propanolol
ACTIVE COMPARATORPropanolol (Syprol:oral solution)
Acebutolol
ACTIVE COMPARATORAcebutolol (Sectral:oral solution)
Interventions
10 mg/kg/jour in 2 doses during 90 days after gradual increase of doses in the first week
3 mg/kg/jour in 3 doses during 90 days after gradual increase of doses in the first week
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Infants under 6 months
- Presenting a hemangioma with the following characteristics:
- subcutaneous and / or cutaneous
- minimum diameter of 1.5cm on face, 5cm outside face and 3cm if it is ulcerated.
- without functional impairment requiring treatment or vital corticosteroid
- Consent of both parents (or the person having parental authority in families)
- Which at least one parent is a beneficiary of a social security system.
You may not qualify if:
- Indication of treatment with corticosteroids for an indication other than hemangioma
- Indication of treatment with beta-blocker for another indication that the hemangioma
- Infant presenting cons-indications for the administration of acebutolol or propranolol:
- Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in their severe forms.
- Heart failure controlled by treatment.
- Cardiogenic shock
- Prinzmetal Angina
- Bradycardia (\<80 beats / min at rest the first month \<70/minute from 1 to 6 month).
- Raynaud's phenomenon and peripheral arterial disorders in their severe forms.
- Pheochromocytoma untreated.
- Low blood pressure (blood pressure \<60/30 mmHg before 6 months)
- Hypersensitivity to acebutolol or propranolol
- History of anaphylactic reaction.
- Treatment with amiodarone and / or calcium channel blockers.
- Congenital heart disease outside inter auricular communication (CIA) or inter ventricular communication (CIV) insignificant
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
UH Lyon
Lyon, 69130, France
UH Marseill
Marseille, 13385, France
Chirurgy Plastic Department
Montpellier, 34295, France
UH NCaremeau
Nîmes, 30000, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michèle Bigorre, PH
UH Montpellier
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 28, 2012
First Posted
December 6, 2012
Study Start
November 1, 2012
Primary Completion
June 1, 2015
Study Completion
June 1, 2015
Last Updated
June 1, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-05